Hi
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
Object[] invokeXML( Document );
I am not sure that an array of objects in this case would be very useful,
and would
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
|Might want to make it
|
|invoke name=... method=...
| argument type=... value=.../
yes good idea,
sorry but no:
argument type=.../argument
allowing a nested null/ tag
my 2c.
Trevor
___
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
Since people really want to help.
Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX invocations?
invoke name=... method=... arguments=commaSeparatedStrings
signature=.../
will result in a
server.invoke(new ObjectName(name), method, Object[] (from args),
well yes,
the idea is to move towards webservices as fast as we can.
I want to 'get something' that will work with XML. It will need to be
compliant down the road.
I want something in, ASAP, Open Source development, it can be as fancy as
you want down the road,
marcf
| Isn't this what
Since people really want to help.
Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX invocations?
invoke name=... method=... arguments=commaSeparatedStrings
signature=.../
will result in a
server.invoke(new ObjectName(name), method, Object[] (from args), String[]
(from signature));
any takers? that
Might want to make it
invoke name=... method=...
argument type=... value=.../
...
/invoke
This should be fairly simply to do, what would be it used for?
--jason
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
Since people really want to help.
Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX
|Might want to make it
|
|invoke name=... method=...
| argument type=... value=.../
yes good idea,
| ...
|/invoke
|
|This should be fairly simply to do, what would be it used for?
just a proxy that understands XML messages in input, just an adaptor
very useful (you'll see)
marcf
|
Might also want to expose methods like:
void invoke(Document)
and
Object invoke(Element)
Where the first would assume that there are more than one invoke's and
the second would assume that the passed in element is a invoke and it
should return the value of server.invoke().
If no one else
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:19 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
|
|
|Might also want to expose methods like:
|
| void invoke(Document
would like to do it, is tomorrow (Saturday) ok ?
Have fun - Andy
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
|Might want to make it
|
|invoke name=... method=...
| argument
: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:27 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:19 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
Object[] invokeXML( Document );
I am not sure that an array of objects in this case would be very useful,
and would lead to a possible memory issue for large invokations in this
manner... in extereme cases that is.
Why clutter up the method name with an XML suffix when you are passing in
XML
12 matches
Mail list logo
