Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-d
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] communicating changes
> Like this?
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg110
85.html
>
> david jencks
>
> On 2001.11.
Like this?
http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg11085.html
david jencks
On 2001.11.13 13:43:12 -0500 Scott M Stark wrote:
> Part of the problem with communicating architecture changes is that
> discussions are embedded in threads whose subject ultimiately is
>
Part of the problem with communicating architecture changes is that
discussions are embedded in threads whose subject ultimiately is
virtually meaningless for the concluding remarks. Also, the conclusions
about what is to be done are often left implied based on the thread
arguments.
If your going
