Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole with PostgreSQL

2001-11-19 Thread Dave Smith
Here is my postgresql-default-service.xml that is in the deploy directory Hunter Hillegas wrote: I am starting to test my app on RH/3.0alpha so I need to get it running against Postgres 7.1. It looks like the config for datasources has changed/moved quite a bit. What files do I need to

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole with PostgreSQL

2001-11-19 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Here is a sample. Have fun - Andy - Original Message - From: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JBoss Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:18 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole with PostgreSQL I am starting to test my app on RH/3.0alpha so I need to get it

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit hole

2001-08-31 Thread Jason Dillon
SUN is a dead company, head is in the clouds but the emperor is naked. Naked? What does that say about Java? --jason ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit hole

2001-08-30 Thread Dave Smith
marc fleury wrote: |In the classpath declaration I think | |crimson.jar |jaxp.jar | |need to be |../crimson.jar |../jaxp.jar they are referenced through run.mf Ok I see that. When I built it thats where they went. So do these classes have to be present in order for jboss to

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit hole

2001-08-30 Thread marc fleury
|Ok I see that. When I built it thats where they went. So do these |classes have to be present in order for jboss to load over the network? |If yes then should I change run.mf to ../lib/ext or do I remove them |from the jboss-service.xml classpath? The jaxp stuff is buggy with CL and it needs

Re: [JBoss-dev] rabbit hole alpha

2001-08-30 Thread Dain Sundstrom
CVS - Original Message - From: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JBoss Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:47 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] rabbit hole alpha Not risk adverse if it helps the cause! I need a stable platform for deployment... If that means

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit hole

2001-08-30 Thread Dave Smith
marc fleury wrote: |Ok I see that. When I built it thats where they went. So do these |classes have to be present in order for jboss to load over the network? |If yes then should I change run.mf to ../lib/ext or do I remove them |from the jboss-service.xml classpath? The jaxp stuff is

Re: [JBoss-dev] rabbit hole alpha

2001-08-30 Thread Hunter Hillegas
] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:55:46 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] rabbit hole alpha Hunter, I don't know about Marc's code but it sounds like his new stuff is working. As for the CMP 2.0 code, I think it is in need of some more new users. I

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit hole

2001-08-30 Thread Jason Dillon
What does fixed on apache mean? --jason On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, marc fleury wrote: |Go with the lib/boot and lib/services. I'm assuming once those |jars are CL safe thenwe can move the jars from boot to services |and remove boot. yes everything but jmxri and jboss-boot.jar (jboss-spine is

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit hole

2001-08-30 Thread David Jencks
I believe there was a long discussion on ant-dev about this, apparently politics @ sun is holding up releasing fixed parsers, ant 1.4 distro includes the fixed version from apache with better classloading. It didn't work for them either. david jencks On 2001.08.30 17:45:39 -0400 Jason Dillon

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0

2001-08-02 Thread Schaefer, Andreas
Hi -Original Message- From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0 So how about including in the ear: 1. jboss-ear.xml with dtd like That's OK for me BUT what

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0

2001-08-02 Thread David Jencks
Of David |Jencks |Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:26 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0 | | |Marc, this is good news indeed. | |Before you get too far down the rabbit hole I would like to inquire if the |patch I submitted (443701) that makes

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0

2001-08-01 Thread David Jencks
Marc, this is good news indeed. Before you get too far down the rabbit hole I would like to inquire if the patch I submitted (443701) that makes the configuration service into a deployer, so you can deploy additional bits of configuration, is an appropriate part of rabbit hole, or if this

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0

2001-08-01 Thread marc fleury
where you would expect the service.xml and classes any concensus? marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David |Jencks |Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:26 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rabbit Hole Commits in 3.0

2001-08-01 Thread marc fleury
||Do you have the classloader problem solved so you can deploy mbeans from a ||jcml file without the classes being on the preexisting classpath? yes, real hot deploy of services, real use of JMX's MLet too... marcf || ||Thanks ||david jencks ___