Ignacio Coloma wrote:
> You can document it as a bug on Sun. If it really is, they can confirm it.
> Only take care of NOT SPEAKING ABOUT any imaginary patch :)
Sun doesn't mind patches to the java.* libraries when
commmitting bug reports.
The also dont mind it for the purpose of internal researc
> enter the classloaders, obtaining the respective CL locks and the
> ServiceLibrary code mutually dispatching them will block.
>
> Is that a valid scenario?
>
> CGJ
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ole Husgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
&
"Jung , Dr. Christoph" wrote:
>
> I must correct myself! We have a principle problem, unfortunately, for which
> I do not
> have an immediate answer right now:
>
> Actually, instead of synchronized(classLoaders) in ServiceLibraries, there
> would be the need
> to *atomically* synchronize on all
me ;)
|
|Simon
|
|> -Original Message-
|> From: Ole Husgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> Sent: martedi 2 ottobre 2001 18:49
|> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
|> org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader
|>
|>
|> Hi,
|>
|>
sgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: martedi 2 ottobre 2001 18:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
> org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this bug is the reason for the problems
> we see with the au
Hi,
I think this bug is the reason for the problems
we see with the automated tests.
Here the test count sometimes gets very low due
to the tests timing out.
Looking into this is hard, as it seems to change
with every run, but one thing seems to be common:
The deployer stops working, and the tim
|A workaround could be to always lock on the ServiceLibrary.classLoaders but
|that may not be very efficient.
then this is the solution and I don't
think it is a critical speed problem at this point. So just go ahead with
the fix... thank you for this work
marcf
|
|Anyone got a better idea?
|
|(BTW: If somebody would offer Voodoo-puppets of SUN developers in the
|jboss-store, you could make a fortune! If you would additionally provide
|JBoss-needles, you could even make a bigger one!)
LOL ^ 10
listen I really want to finish the website but will try to come back to this
soon (like ton
I must correct myself! We have a principle problem, unfortunately, for which
I do not
have an immediate answer right now:
Actually, instead of synchronized(classLoaders) in ServiceLibraries, there
would be the need
to *atomically* synchronize on all instances of the set in order not to
interfere