> Won't introducing the same code require an incompatible
> change to the current datasource jboss-service.xml schema?
> Given the hideous nature of 3.0 format I can't say this is a
> bad thing.
I am glad the clowns responsible for this configuration mess self-flushed
themselves to apache
Clea
a Lindfors
> Sent: samedi, 25 octobre 2003 10:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] We need a 3.0.9 maintenance release
>
>
> I think it would help to call it other than 3.0.9 release
> then, otherwise people assume that their 3.0.x apps will run
> without chang
I think it would help to call it other than 3.0.9 release then, otherwise
people assume that their 3.0.x apps will run without changes.
JBoss 3.0 SP1 ? ;-)
-- Juha
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Won't introducing the same code require an incompatible change
> to the current dataso
Won't introducing the same code require an incompatible change
to the current datasource jboss-service.xml schema? Given the
hideous nature of 3.0 format I can't say this is a bad thing.
Everything else seems to be an implementation detail I don't have
a problem with.
--
Sc
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 18:40, Scott M Stark wrote:
> We need a 3.0.9 maintenance release. Let me know what outstanding
> issues need to be ported to the 3.0 branch for a release so I can
> set a timeframe for this.
I'd like to backport jbossmq, mdb and jca from 3.2.
This would let me maintain one c
