Hi all, Just thought of another (better?) option. Leave the registry as a MMB with the default NullPersistenceManager. Then persist using an internal mechanism (this is what the Dynamic MB would do anyway).
- Matt -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Munz Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:39 PM To: JBoss Developers Group Subject: [JBoss-dev] Why is the MB Registry a MMB? Juha & JMX-dev, Why is the MB Registry a MMB? Could it be a Dynamic MB instead? I'm running into a chicken-and-egg problem. The persistence interceptor instantiated in preRegister() for the MB REgistry MMB tries to create a Timer MB. This requires that the MB registry MMB has already been registered, which of cousre, it hasn't. Since the MB Registry needs a custom persistence manager anyway, perhaps it could handle its own persistence internally? An alternative to this would be to modify the persistence interceptor so that it does not use the Timer MB in this special case. Either way, let me know your preference/ideas. - Matt ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
