t; as their second level cache.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Scott Marlow
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:12 AM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned f
6 10:12 AM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 15:56 +0200, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:44:51 +0200, Scott Marlow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me. My nex
Can I ask a dumb question:
Why?
Why - as in why the first-level cache in Hibernate is not pluggable ?
Then the answer is:
The first-level cache is a very specialized context that is very crucial
for Hibernate
to work. "first-level cache" is also generic term used to explain people
*one*
Can I ask a dumb question:
Why?
-Andy
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Sounds good to me. My next question is how do we tell Hibernate to
use
> JBoss Cache as the first level cache?
*first* level cache ? Why would you ever want that ?
You mean second level cache, right ?
I mean first level c
> Sounds good to me. My next question is how do we tell Hibernate to
use
> JBoss Cache as the first level cache?
*first* level cache ? Why would you ever want that ?
You mean second level cache, right ?
I mean first level cache, which by default is using ehcache-1.1.jar
(jira JBAS-2868).
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 15:56 +0200, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:44:51 +0200, Scott Marlow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me. My next question is how do we tell Hibernate to use
> > JBoss Cache as the first level cache?
>
> *first* level cache ? Why wou
cache.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Marlow
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:05 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
>
> Does anyone reading this
ty jar to handle the
> baseline cache.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Scott Marlow
> > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:05 PM
> > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
&
> Behalf Of Adrian Brock
> > Sent: 04 April, 2006 00:38
> > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
> >
> > I already created a more generic version of this:
> > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/IssueNaviga
onday, April 03, 2006 2:05 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
>
> Does anyone reading this understand how "JBAS-2868 Missing
> jar ehcache-1.1.jar for Hibernate support" should be fixed?
>
> It is only of
Nice. How you indicate in the filter "next release" ?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adrian Brock
> Sent: 04 April, 2006 00:38
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [
I already created a more generic version of this:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12310181
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 16:20 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> This filter should show the open 4.0.4.GA issues left for every user
> (i.e. the current user), so you
This filter should show the open 4.0.4.GA issues left for every user
(i.e. the current user), so you can see what's assigned to you.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestI
d=12310484
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
f Of Adrian Brock
> > Sent: 03 April, 2006 22:51
> > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
> >
> > Try again.
> >
> > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 14:31 -0500, Ryan Campbell wrote:
> > > Adri
Works for me!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adrian Brock
> Sent: 03 April, 2006 22:51
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4
>
> Try again.
&g
Try again.
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 14:31 -0500, Ryan Campbell wrote:
> Adrian, it doesn't look like this filter is public.
>
> Errors
>
> * Could not getRequest search with this id.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adria
Adrian, it doesn't look like this filter is public.
Errors
* Could not getRequest search with this id.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Brock
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:26 PM
To: jboss-development
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Unas
17 matches
Mail list logo
