JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 195
Successful tests: 195
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 12 December 2001 8:53 GMT]
[java.version:
hello,
in the latest CVS build, no example nor documentation can be found about
Local homes and bean implementations.
This is not such a problem, but the jaws.xml specifications for bean
relationships mappings are non existent.
Could someone help with that?
thanks,
Stan.
User: lqd
Date: 01/12/12 02:27:32
Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jbossmq.jar
Log:
sync w/ JBossMQ b/c of SF Bug #491613
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.8.4.10 +398 -399
User: lqd
Date: 01/12/12 02:27:32
Modified:src/client Tag: Branch_2_4 jbossmq-client.jar
Log:
sync w/ JBossMQ b/c of SF Bug #491613
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.6.4.9 +305 -309
Bugs item #491613, was opened at 2001-12-11 08:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=491613group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 127
Successful tests: 127
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 12 December 2001 11:29 GMT]
[java.version:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
Hello,
The org.jboss.Shutdown class does
I recall back when i was looking at the undependencys that :
-the callchain used by jboss_redhat_init.sh stop is using these MBeans
JMX:name=Connector,type=RMI
Adaptor:name=html
JBOSS-SYSTEM:service=Naming
and when they go out of scope (naming) ... no more is logged ? ...
--so those MBeans
on 1-12-12 08.43, Ara at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey I'm using WebSphere myself :-)
But I think I should look at jboss more seriously ;-)
It look's like it is going to be *redefining-the-industry* easy to develop
and deploy on ... it will save You vast amounts of time ... simply one will
get
User: lqd
Date: 01/12/12 07:20:13
Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jbossmq.jar
Log:
copy due to bug in new SpyTextMessage.java
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.8.4.11 +261 -262
User: lqd
Date: 01/12/12 07:20:14
Modified:src/client Tag: Branch_2_4 jbossmq-client.jar
Log:
copy due to bug in new SpyTextMessage.java
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.6.4.10 +189 -190
Bugs item #492059, was opened at 2001-12-12 07:35
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=492059group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brill Pappin (brill)
Assigned
Oh, I thought you wrote one-to-many unidirectional. Anyway, the cmr code is
to agressive when adding and removing relationships. I'm going to look at
this soon, because it is in the way of another feature.
-dain
-Original Message-
From: Langelage, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:39:27
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/bridge
CMPFieldBridge.java
Log:
Fixed some spelling errors in the comments.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +3 -3
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:41:34
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/bridge
CMRFieldBridge.java
Log:
Remove the commented out getFieldType method.
Added isReadOnly method.
Fixed some comments.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5
Bugs item #492123, was opened at 2001-12-12 09:43
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=492123group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brill Pappin (brill)
Assigned
Bugs item #492123, was opened at 2001-12-12 09:43
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=492123group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brill Pappin (brill)
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:43:11
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/bridge
EntityBridgeInvocationHandler.java
Log:
Added code to throw an exception is set is called on a readonly cmr field.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +5 -1
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:45:10
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
RelationSet.java
Log:
Added code to throw an exception if user attempts to alter the set on a
readonly cmr field.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:47:06
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java
Log:
Added code to support readonly cmr fields.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +64 -9
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
[xdoclet] Loading source file
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:48:36
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata
JDBCCMPFieldMetaData.java
Log:
Cleaned up code. Fixed comments...
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +178 -79
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:51:09
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd
Log:
Added support for read-only cmr fields.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -1 jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd
Index:
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 11:49:42
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata
JDBCRelationshipRoleMetaData.java
Log:
Added support for readonly cmr fields.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +19 -5
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:10:07
jbosstest/src/resources/cmp2/readonly/META-INF - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:10:58
Added: src/resources/cmp2/readonly/META-INF ejb-jar.xml jboss.xml
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Initial revision of configureation files for cmp2-readonly test.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:10:58
Added: src/resources/cmp2/readonly client.policy jndi.properties
Log:
Initial revision of configureation files for cmp2-readonly test.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:04:53
Modified:junitejb/junitejb/lib junitejb.jar
Log:
JUnitEJB 1.0 beta 2
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +19 -19thirdparty/junitejb/junitejb/lib/junitejb.jar
Binary file
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:05:40
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/readonly - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:06:38
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/readonly Book.java
BookBean.java BookHome.java Publisher.java
PublisherBean.java PublisherHome.java
ReadonlyUnitTestCase.java
Log:
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:09:09
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/relationship
RelationshipUnitTestCase.java
Log:
Changed jar name to cmp-relationship.jar
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -2
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:08:24
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test JBossTestCase.java
Log:
Make static getJ2eeTestSuite methods public.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +3 -3 jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/JBossTestCase.java
Index: JBossTestCase.java
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/12/12 12:09:53
jbosstest/src/resources/cmp2/readonly - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Bugs item #492123, was opened at 2001-12-12 09:43
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=492123group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brill Pappin (brill)
Patches item #492167, was opened at 2001-12-12 11:44
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=492167group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Larry Sanderson (lsanders)
Just a quick thought... I was thinking that it might be nice to specify
ant'ish filesets for the url list used by the autodeployer. Could probably
even use the ant DirectoryScanner (or whatever it may be called now) to get
the job done too.
mbean code=org.jboss.deployment.AutoDeployer
Patches item #492169, was opened at 2001-12-12 11:56
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=492169group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Larry Sanderson (lsanders)
Bugs item #492197, was opened at 2001-12-12 13:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=492197group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr)
Assigned to:
Again, quick thought...
Was thinking that we might want to change the way we use JMX domain names.
Right now we have something like this:
Adaptor
J2EE
JBOSS-SYSTEM
JBossMQ
JCA
JMImplementation
JMX
Jetty
Security
SingleJBoss
ZClassLoaders
This does not really
Hi peter,
I hope you see this before you go on your trip.
I fixed up the problems that your code exposed and commited them along with
your changes. The testsuite seems to be running ok so I think all is good.
Regards,
Hiram
From: Peter Antman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: chirino
Date: 01/12/12 14:12:18
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/tm XidImpl.java
Log:
MDB update. Now we support packing 1 message in a session. Each
message will correctly be commited/rolled back in it's own tx. (Before the group
would be in a single tx.) The TM
I was thinking last night about how crappy the whole archive thing that sun
started is with respect to changing the configuration easily. I was
thinking that it is a bitch to extract a .ear, edit the application.xml,
then re-jar it and copy it to change where my .war gets deployed too.
This
Not to offend you, Jason, but where have you been for the past couple of
weeks? There has been a whole bunch of threads about deploying XMLs only,
getting rid of packaging hell, glueing descriptors together, etc. Perhaps,
the birds kept you away from e-mail :)
And you are right, this is where
Bugs item #492197, was opened at 2001-12-12 13:13
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=492197group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Frank Langelage (lafr)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #490156, was opened at 2001-12-07 00:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=490156group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rune Hamnvik (runeh)
Assigned to:
Not to offend you, Jason, but where have you been for the past couple of
weeks? There has been a whole bunch of threads about deploying XMLs only,
getting rid of packaging hell, glueing descriptors together, etc. Perhaps,
the birds kept you away from e-mail :)
No worries; I am not offended.
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:40:52
thirdparty/jdom - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:39:23
Modified:src/main/javax/management/modelmbean
ModelMBeanInfoSupport.java
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +12 -13
jmx/src/main/javax/management/modelmbean/ModelMBeanInfoSupport.java
Index:
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:41:14
thirdparty/jdom/beta-7 - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:41:35
thirdparty/jdom/beta-7/lib - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:42:45
Added: jdom/beta-7/lib jdom.jar
Log:
JDOM API (beta 7)
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 thirdparty/jdom/beta-7/lib/jdom.jar
Binary file
___
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:43:38
thirdparty/xml - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:44:25
thirdparty/xml/sax/lib - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:45:21
Added: xml/sax/lib sax2.jar
Log:
SAX2 API
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 thirdparty/xml/sax/lib/sax2.jar
Binary file
___
Jboss-development mailing list
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:46:12
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JDOM and SAX2 added to javac classpath
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +17 -1 jmx/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:53:23
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mx/server StandardMBeanInvoker.java
Log:
invocation creation moved to abstract superclass
standard mbean specific code here
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:56:18
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mx/server MBeanInvoker.java
Log:
superclass for mbean type specific invokers
implements DMBean except for the getMBeanInfo
(getMI() won't travel through the interceptor stack yet)
Revision Changes
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 15:57:40
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/server MBeanServerImpl.java
Log:
StandardMBean - StandardMBeanInvoker
... and a bug fix
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -3 jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/server/MBeanServerImpl.java
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 16:02:21
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mx/modelmbean ModelBase.java
ModelMBeanConstants.java XMBean.java
XMBeanConstants.java
Log:
part of the mmb implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 16:06:49
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mx/interceptor ModelMBeanInterceptor.java
Log:
the reflection invoker
persistence and caching probably going into their separate interceptors
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 16:08:42
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/metadata StandardMetaData.java
Log:
reformatting + stuff
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +120 -31 jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/metadata/StandardMetaData.java
Index: StandardMetaData.java
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 16:10:03
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mx/metadata XMLMetaData.java
Log:
xml based MMB metadata parsing
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/metadata/XMLMetaData.java
Index: XMLMetaData.java
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/12/12 16:12:58
Modified:src/main/test TestMX.java
Log:
MMB wrapper for standard mbean
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +236 -173 jmx/src/main/test/TestMX.java
Index: TestMX.java
Bugs item #483847, was opened at 2001-11-20 08:42
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=483847group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hunter Hillegas (hunterhillegas)
Bugs item #490187, was opened at 2001-12-07 04:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=490187group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Julien Viet (cooperfbi)
Assigned
huh?
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why don't these have vendor directories?
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Sorry I meant vendor prefixes for the configuration bits:
!-- SAX --
property name=sax.root value=${project.thirdparty}/xml/sax/
property name=sax.lib value=${sax.root}/lib/
path id=sax.classpath
pathelement path=${sax.lib}/sax2.jar/
/path
All others have a vendor
Interesting idea, jason.
We already have default overrides in a lot of places:
ra.xml for a resource adapter can have default values for
ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties, the ConnectionFactoryLoader supplies specific
values.
Defaults are generated for cmp mapping stuff, jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/12/12 19:28:24
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/selectors Selector.java
Log:
remove overly verbose logging
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +5 -5 jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/selectors/Selector.java
Index: Selector.java
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 127
Successful tests: 125
Errors:2
Failures: 0
[time of test: 13 December 2001 5:4 GMT]
[java.version:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
HERE ARE THE LAST 50 LINES OF THE LOG FILE
Hello,
The org.jboss.Shutdown class does
Why to we return the Session rather than XASession in StdServerSession
getSession method? I can't find a requirement for either one in the specs,
but it would seem that the XASession would be the better choice as the
underlying QueueSession or TopicSession can be obtained from the
XAQueueSession
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 201
Successful tests: 201
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 13 December 2001 6:12 GMT]
[java.version:
Never mind, I just refreshed and see that we now do return the XASession
if it is not null.
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Why to we return the Session rather than XASession
Tag that build!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 201
Successful tests: 201
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 13 December 2001 7:30 GMT]
[java.version:
76 matches
Mail list logo
