I have looked at a number of ejb deployments and they don't show
this issue. Something is wrong with the ejb-ref link or the context
listing for this deployment. Can you post the ear to sourceforge
so I can look at it?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group,
well, well, well... (what was the JVM BTW?)
Houston, we have a problem.
As I told Marc, maybe we have a problem with our classloader in
multithreaded situations when two threads are trying to load the same class
at the same time and it is not yet cached. If both of these classes have the
same
Bugs item #544437, was opened at 2002-04-15 18:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=544437group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #556262, was opened at 2002-05-15 09:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556262group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Fox (timfox)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #556287, was opened at 2002-05-15 03:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556287group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stéphane Bidoul (sbidoul)
Assigned
Bugs item #556287, was opened at 2002-05-15 03:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556287group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stéphane Bidoul (sbidoul)
Assigned
Hello!
New HP-UX test info from 2002/05/15 1.30a.m. CVS version for Branch_3_0.
Have fun!
Duarte HappyGuy Loreto
Don't worry, be happy!
Number of tests run: 585
Successful tests: 569
Bugs item #556262, was opened at 2002-05-15 02:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556262group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Fox (timfox)
Assigned to:
I would like to incorporate a number of mobile agent, AI systems into JBOSS.
I would like to use these Resource Manager Connection Factory References
java:comp/env/Agent/Jade (Jade http://sharon.cselt.it/projects/jade/)
java:comp/env/Agent/Aglets (Agelets
Are there any current or future restrictions, within JBoss, of what can go
into a J2EE platform?
No.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
___
Have big pipes?
Bugs item #556312, was opened at 2002-05-15 06:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556312group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Kerr (ajkerr)
Assigned to: Scott M Stark
jason, sacha or dain
i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs
have 20 classes (from Class1 to Class20) with impossible links to each other
like
class1-2, 4, 5 ,8
class8- loops back to one, 4, 9 etc
and then 20 threads that each loads a class, if you can package in different
jason, sacha or dain
i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs
Sure. I don't have time now though. Any one else?
Cheers,
Sacha
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
This is a patch release to 2.4.5 that rolls back a bug
fix to prepared statement caching that caused problems
with numerous databases.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Hello Andreas,
Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 7:12:50 PM, you wrote:
AS This is my design I came up with:
AS - New deployer (FoeDeployer) which works
ASlike an EJBDeployer
AS - Main or EJB-Deployer figures out that this
ASarchives isn't off JBoss type and hand it over
ASto the
|Does convertions of not-JBoss-DD's are done by FoeDeployer? We could
|have an abstract converter that will be subclassed by converters for
|different app servers (to look ahead).
here we go, the scourge of new developers the plague of abtract-itis to
look ahead on first pass. Don't look ahead
Bugs item #542365, was opened at 2002-04-11 02:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=542365group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
That looks like the problem seen when an inner classes references
its outer classes log object. I belive this is a bug in the compiler
but have not had time to create a test case. The work around is
to add a reference to the inner class and initialize it to the out
class variable.
Almost. Now it's missing org.jboss.util.MuLong.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] missing org.jboss.util.id.GUID from client
jars?
Hello.
Maybe something easy could be achieved with some kind of XSL transformation ?
regards.
* * *
View thread online: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=15677
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
I have seen this mostly on SUN's 1.4 on Linux. I have not touched blackdown
since 1.1.7.
--jason
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 07:11 am, Sacha Labourey wrote:
well, well, well... (what was the JVM BTW?)
Houston, we have a problem.
As I told Marc, maybe we have a problem with our classloader
Any plans on moving this forward to extract the JRMP specific bits from User
TX in the near future?
--jason
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 07:26 am, Scott M Stark wrote:
The discussion that Marc and Ole had previously suggested that
the Transaction implementation should be serializable and this
I would have to look at it again but Ole pretty much convinced me that the
TX stuff is correct, it is in fact a property of the spec that we end up
with this kludgy design and spaghetti code mess.
One day when I really can lay back and work on something new, spec wise, I
will write a new
Hi Geeks
Based on an email of Dain I think the easiest
way to start is to use the Deployer's accept()
method and add additional test in the current
deployers there that only JBoss compliant
are deployed.
Now the Foe-Deployer can check it if not
compliant and then try to convert it to a
JBoss
This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
create deployment units that contain all app server DDs and even
proprietary descriptors for their own use.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original
Hi Scott
This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
create deployment units that contain all app server DDs and even
proprietary descriptors for their own use.
I don't think it would cause problems because I don't check if there
are foe DDs but if the archives misses
I'm saying that users are including jboss.xml, weblogic.xml,
sun-j2ee-ri.xml, ...
DDs in the deployment build because they want a one deployment unit works
with all servers package.
This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
create deployment units that contain all app
on 15-05-2 16.51, Sacha Labourey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jason, sacha or dain
i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs
Sure. I don't have time now though. Any one else?
Ilike to - then time says - hepp- like - i do have the time to read and
grep the 'thingo' - just
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 224
Errors:299
Failures: 1
[time of test: 16 May 2002 0:28 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
on 16-05-2 01.18, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because they want a one deployment unit works
with all servers package.
What can We be part of Invent here ?
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
Sir,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. I respectfully
insist that you read this letter carefully, as I am optimistic that it will open doors
for unimaginable financial rewards for both of us.
I am very sorry for not introducing myself first. My name is
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 1:6 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Bugs item #556567, was opened at 2002-05-15 17:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556567group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeffrey Wescott (binaryfeed)
Assigned to:
Sir,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. I respectfully
insist that you read this letter carefully, as I am optimistic that it will open doors
for unimaginable financial rewards for both of us.
I am very sorry for not introducing myself first. My name is
Bugs item #556567, was opened at 2002-05-15 17:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=556567group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeffrey Wescott (binaryfeed)
Assigned
Hi Scott
For the sake of stability and easier to use the accept() is not
a good choice.
So I guess the only thing we can do is really to create a second
Main Deployer providing another domain of deployment.
Now I can add a Scanner on a different directory (like the Farm)
and use the
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 1:43 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
If we don't currently support deployment domains with different
policies we need to as converting third partly packages is only
one use case.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Andreas
1. Multiple domains could be set up pretty easily if we reversed the
dependency between MainDeployer and SubDeployers. Subdeployers would be
standalone, MainDeployer would have a depends-list of all the subdeployers
it used. At least one complete deployer would have to be in the
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 2:42 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
Fagerlund
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:31 PM
To: Sacha Labourey; marc fleury; Jason Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 3:37 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
| Love
| pf
|
|
|Dude are you on crack?
|
|
|___
|
|Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for mirrors. We supply
I couldn't resist, the sourceforge line (oops pun intended) was just too
good
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 4:23 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_02]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 734
Errors:21
Failures: 2
[time of test: 16 May 2002 5:39 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
45 matches
Mail list logo
