At 01:27 PM 12/22/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At the end it also
leads to the question if Marc or JBG can take JBoss, kick out all the
developers
and sell it. But I am not a layer and cannot answer the question.
Isn't all the code LGPL? It is theoretically possible to remove CVS access
to all the
I hadn't, but have now. I have not changed
URLDirectoryScanner but attempted
to roll its functionality into the core URLDeploymentScanner using
collection URLs to discriminate - does this work for you?
This would be great, thanks for taking the time.
It seems the root cause of your bug is
Oh my, it is difficult to judge with only second hand information,
but I feel very annoyed about the (possible) mix of commercial
aspects (between JBG and Andy as a consultant) with developement
aspects.
But should cvs write access be the battlefield for this?
The jsr-77 issue is a separate
I really don't like the idea of
non-technical clash on jboss-developement.
should one open a new discussion board about this issue ?
to prevent future invention of this uncomfortable stuff unconveniently.
couldn't resist too
bax
Regards,
Michael Bartmann
Development and support are not separable. Do you let anyone modify
code you support? This discussion needs to move the forums. Marc
will take it up tomorrow.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
Did you miss out on AMCG, UP 461%?
Here's another pick - Another SHORT PLAY
CLICK HERE
Click here to unsubscribe
buvvkfvfwmpulmohbpffydxwxqpnroqukpm
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Bugs item #657837, was opened at 2002-12-23 08:26
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=657837group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eyal Lupu (eyall)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
None of the JBG supporters has written everything by himself.
This is of course a matter of control and organization, which
you do very well as master of the tree.
I wont let everybody do everything, but if somebody wants to
contribute in the right direction he should not be blocked.
OTOH if
James,
We called it our Groove Killer but never got enough $$ after 9-11 to
launch it full scale. I'd like to rewrite the framework I built our
product on using Jboss and open source it. Something like Eclipse but
not so IDE-centric in focus. Anyway, it modeled the EJB lifecycle for
Andy is working on a competing implementation to jboss. His own lawyers
at his company have requested he not work on JBoss, he was doing so
anyway under an alias. We only found out about the competing aspect a
couple of days ago. To protect ourselves legally, we removed Andy's RW,
we will in
o do you want to integrate it using jni and run the
jboss jvm as root, or
No.
o do you want to run it in a separate process and
interface (with simple udp encaps. as I proposed)
or e.g. with corba.
Yes, an MBean has to provide the channel through which ICMP requests
are sent.
Marc,
I don't want to encourage this thread by adding to it, but I think a few
clarifications would be beneficial for me.
Andy is working on a competing implementation to jboss.
Would it be possible to name this competing implementation?
We cannot have a competitor's code
Hi
Oohh, the power of legal issues, you can justify nearly everything.
Instead of looking for a mutual compromise to resolve this issue
Marc (and others) sought a more terminal solution.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'JBoss
Andy,
I agree with the meta point that it would be better to have a publicly
defined structure for how the JBoss project is managed, but I think you
are the wrong advocate for this issue. I actually think you make it
less likely that such a thing will ever occur. Andy, if you want to be
I put in a check so that errors getting last-modified do not trigger
redeployment.
I haven't I'm afraid, I did enough to get the rest of my team
working and left it at that :-(. I suspect it may be similar
to the WebSphere problem that I had to work around.
I'll have a quick look at it
When lawyers and law are involved, compromize is often impossible.
If you are working on a competing product at your day job and JBoss by
night, you risk infecting your employer's codebase with LGPL code, and
the JBoss code by proprietary code. I'm not saying you'd intentionally
do that, but
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
Do you own your own work anymore?
This is actually a key issue that everyone working on
this type of projejct should really be aware of. If
you are a permanent employee of a company in the USofA
which produces copyrightable material (such as
Title: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye II
I know
that I am not a lawyer and have only a semester of law to my name, but is there
any real case law related to this matter? I could see where your employer
could make claims against your private work if you were working on an open
source project that
We need better management information. A lot of the JSR-77 stuff is useful
information, the only problem was with how it was integrated, not really
tested, and not understood by the people working on the core stuff into
which this foreign code was interjected.
Where applicable this should be
As much as I hate to let this whole thread spin too far off topic...
In California I know that work you do does NOT get automatically assigned
to your employer and, if your employer wants your independent work assigned
over to them they must put that in the employment contract AND a copy of
Rhett,
It all depends on your specific case. When it comes to this type of
law, there are no hard and fast rules (every contract and country/state
is different). You need to talk to a lawyer.
-dain
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 01:31 PM, Rhett Aultman wrote:
I know that I am not a
Inconsistent treatment of spaces and braces is creeping into the codebase again.
Review the coding guidelines with regard to these issues so that someone else
does not have to reformat your code to bring it to spec and waste a cvs history
entry.
Coding standards are here:
FYI, I've created a forum on the topic.
http://www.jboss.org/forums/forum.jsp?forum=160
Scott McLaughlin, do you want to drive any of this? Seems you've had some
energy around this.
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
The key phrase in the US code governing this is a
work prepared by an employee within the scope of his
or her employment, and the determining case at the
federal level is CCNV v. Reid. From
http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/cybrscen.htm:
The Court emphasized that state laws of
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 991
Successful tests: 984
Errors:6
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-12-23.12-05 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
If you ever decide to change the standards I highly recommend the book The
Elements of Java Style by Ambler, et al. It fills in the blanks to Sun's
Java coding conventions and provides an accessible quick reference you can
keep on your desk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs item #658042, was opened at 2002-12-23 15:42
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=658042group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
I've addded an xdoclet module to jboss 4 (head) that builds xdoclet from
source from the xdoclet cvs tree. To minize disruption, please read!
You can avoid requiring a fresh jboss checkout by executing in jboss-head
cvs get _jboss_xdoclet
WARNING you may have to run build/build.sh twice, see
Change Notes item #658052, was opened at 2002-12-24 00:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=658052group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to: David Jencks
Bugs item #658060, was opened at 2002-12-23 17:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=658060group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #658042, was opened at 2002-12-23 15:42
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=658042group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Spel again ! ...
tisdagen den 24 december 2002 kl 01.14 skrev David Jencks:
I've addded an xdoclet module to jboss 4 (head) that builds xdoclet
from
source from the xdoclet cvs tree. To minize disruption, please read!
You can avoid requiring a fresh jboss checkout by executing in
Bugs item #658060, was opened at 2002-12-24 01:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=658060group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #658134, was opened at 2002-12-23 23:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=658134group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #658134, was opened at 2002-12-23 23:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=658134group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #644289, was opened at 2002-11-26 11:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=644289group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to:
37 matches
Mail list logo
