[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-825942 ] AutoNumberFactory not thread safe

2003-11-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #825942, was opened at 2003-10-18 16:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by esriram You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=825942group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Shutdown failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Test Results: % ( / ) -

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-833558 ] ClassCastException in NamingContext

2003-11-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #833558, was opened at 2003-10-31 03:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juanmartinez You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=833558group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-835596 ] Can't use ORDER BY for boolean cmp fields

2003-11-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #835596, was opened at 2003-11-04 11:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pkorros You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=835596group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-835596 ] Can't use ORDER BY for boolean cmp fields

2003-11-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #835596, was opened at 2003-11-04 10:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=835596group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-837593 ] Classloading Exception after redeploy

2003-11-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #837593, was opened at 2003-11-07 00:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=837593group_id=22866 Category: JBossSOAP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: Joe Admin User mail services Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-10 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 11/6/03 8:32 PM, Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pseudo rmi code: try { return invokeServer() } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) { if (System.getSecurityManager() == null) throw new No RMI Security Manager etc.; else tryToLoadClassFromRMICodeBase(); } Thanks.

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: Joe Admin User mail services Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-10 Thread Scott M Stark
In order to load the org.jboss.mail.userrepository.MetaInfoImpl class from the codebase, you are going to have to catch the UndeclaredThrowableException and check the nested type since the RMIAdaptor interface does not allow for ClassNotFoundExceptions. -- Scott Stark

[JBoss-dev] Re: DUYMKCRD, and the suspicious

2003-11-10 Thread Horne Lucinda
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTMLHEADTITLE/TITLE META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1251 META content=MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141 name=GENERATOR STYLE/STYLE /HEAD BODY bgColor=#ff font color=whitelaterite smut ashland stimuli directory

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread Scott M Stark
Chris, Can you differentiate these compilation error msgs more clearly from the testsuite runs as people seem to be ignoring them. Instead of an '[AUTOMATED] JBoss...' subject use '[ERROR, AUTOMATED]...' or something like that. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

RE: [JBoss-dev] Check out problem - fixed

2003-11-10 Thread Dimitris Andreadis
Worked fine now! Thanks/Dimitris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: , 7 2003 7:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Check out problem I just did this co and it worked fine. You probably grabbed the

[JBoss-dev] Nagging mail subjects

2003-11-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, I have rejigged them to put the real message first, as follows: Compilation Failed! JBoss ($CVSBRANCH/$PLATFORM/$JVER) [AUTOMATED] JBoss Test Results: $TESTS_SCORE. JBoss (HEAD/$PLATFORM/$JVER) [AUTOMATED] Hope that helps Regards, Chris - Original Message - From: Scott M

Re: [JBoss-dev] Nagging mail subjects

2003-11-10 Thread Scott M Stark
Ok, thanks. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Chris Kimpton wrote: Hi, I have rejigged them to put the real message first, as follows: Compilation Failed! JBoss ($CVSBRANCH/$PLATFORM/$JVER) [AUTOMATED] JBoss Test

[JBoss-dev] [Fwd: RE: Async replication in Integrated Tomcat]

2003-11-10 Thread Bela Ban
done Original Message Subject:RE: Async replication in Integrated Tomcat Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:12:09 +0100 From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: JBossGroup To: 'Bela Ban' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Remy Maucherat'

[JBoss-dev] Buildsystem help needed

2003-11-10 Thread Rupp, Heiko
Hi, I am trying to add better descriptions to the Mbeans in JBoss, so users know what the attributes are when they invoke operations in JMX console. In order to do to, I want to externalize the XMBean descriptors into a directory under server/$version/conf/. I already put a directory with

[JBoss-dev] CVS problem

2003-11-10 Thread Aaron Lindsey
I'm seeing some strange behavior for cvs. If I delete a directory and try to update again (with cvs update -d -P), the directory doesn't come back. The directory is still in the Entries file. Everything comes down fine with a checkout and if I just remove files, they update correctly.

Re: [JBoss-dev] Buildsystem help needed

2003-11-10 Thread Scott M Stark
The dist is built from the build/build.xml _module-*-most or _module-*-all targets depending on whether the most or all target is run. The server/src/etc/conf/default contents are copied in the _module-server-most section: !-- Copy the default configuration files -- mkdir

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS problem

2003-11-10 Thread Scott M Stark
That is standard behavior for cvs as far as I know and relates to its lack of real directory support. You can just checkout the missing directory using the associated module alias. For example, if I remove the jboss-3.2/varia directory, I can refresh it using: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jboss-3.2] cvs co

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1549 / 1634 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-group] Session clustering with Tomcat 5 in JBoss 3.2

2003-11-10 Thread Bill Burke
Bela Ban wrote: Sacha Labourey wrote: That's a point. We have to define clear use cases now that we have a better understanding of usage of HTTP Session clustering in companies. We have to define different policies for: - considering when an attribute/session has been modified (no obvious

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1521 / 1606 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1550 / 1634 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-group] Session clustering with Tomcat 5 in JBoss 3.2

2003-11-10 Thread Bela Ban
Bill Burke wrote: Bela Ban wrote: Sacha Labourey wrote: That's a point. We have to define clear use cases now that we have a better understanding of usage of HTTP Session clustering in companies. We have to define different policies for: - considering when an attribute/session has been

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1519 / 1606 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-10 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===