View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820260#3820260
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820260
Great!
Thanks a lot people.
Maarten
---
The
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820268#3820268
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820268
I checked the j2ee 1.4 specification and in section 8.2 it says:
The Manifest file is named
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Hello Joachim,
first of all, thanks for your work on this.
Since there is no obvious decision how a schema should be updated
looking only at the existing schema and knowing nothing about the
previous mapping details, could you please describe in detail how it
actually
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 15:47, Scott M Stark wrote:
Ok, there appear to be many dependencies on the server module,
many coming from CachedConnectionInterceptor, others from the
org/jboss/resource/adapter/jdbc/remote stuff I just addes due
to naming and invoker stuff. We need to cleanup the
Hi Adrian. Just wondering what was wrong with the 3.2 build? I did the
backport and thought the build was correct. I did not bring over the
jmx tests from head into the testsuite, so can understand if the some of
the tests were outdated (although corrected many of them... actually
thought
Bugs item #890978, was opened at 2004-02-05 13:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=890978group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820296#3820296
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820296
Well, I've done some work in nukes core to provide a rough multi-deployment capability
to nukes. It's very
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820299#3820299
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820299
i am facing a problem with nulls getting printed from all my JSP's on the screen where
the variables are
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820309#3820309
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820309
HEAD is the main version of our source code in our source control system:
You can access our control
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820308#3820308
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820308
I fixed these problems within our source control system.
You can access our control system here:
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820310#3820310
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820310
JBOss AOP is homework? Can you elaborate?
FYI, we're always looking for new help. Open Source is
Bugs item #891036, was opened at 2004-02-05 16:12
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=891036group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820313#3820313
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820313
After a few months of no activity, JBoss AOP development is back in full force.
Between working on JBoss
Hi there !
I have just went through this forum and I thought
JBoss should be in da place.
Even if it's a Linux-oriented forum, there were lots
of open-source softwares present.
BEA was not there but Bull/INRIA consortium was with
JOnAS.
IBM was the gold partner...
Maybe folks get some infos
Bugs item #887832, was opened at 2004-01-30 22:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=887832group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820322#3820322
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820322
this is exactly the kind of situation we would take under the for-pay contracts.
Very few people use
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820323#3820323
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820323
On the subject of control flow, don't forget cflowbelow. Aspectwerkz implemented
cflow, but no below. In
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820330#3820330
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820330
but it seems work not well as in the jboss3.2.3 tomcat engine
sounds like the tomcat do a better job than
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820331#3820331
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820331
i dont know u use the jboss-net or confige the axis
yourself , if the jboss-net ,should be
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820334#3820334
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820334
hi,
i have a big problem (for now 2 days !) and i can't find any solutions on the net...so
you're my last
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820337#3820337
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820337
FYI:
Did some tests in AOP framework with object pooling through a ThreadLocal. I found
that it
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820347#3820347
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820347
this is great stuff
we need you to do a BLOG entry about this to give some visibility and order on the
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820351#3820351
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820351
Absolutely. (I use the AspectJ terms because that's how it's easiest to explain).
It's very similar to
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820390#3820390
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820390
It is not costly to build Invocation objects (field, method, caller, etc...) as it is
only a bunch of
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820391#3820391
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820391
I just added a new feature in HEAD (cvs checkout jboss-head)
Added the ability to define Aspects.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820392#3820392
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820392
I thought object pooling was a good idea when creating the object was costly? If
creating
components
- go to distrib and run build
- then run build deploy-installer
- run installer webapp : http://127.0.0.1:8080/nukes-installer/install
Testing on both Linux and Windows, using J2SDK1.4.2_03 JBoss3.2.3,
CVS snapshots from both 20040204 20040205 fail
30 matches
Mail list logo
