Simon,
Vincent,
Nope.
Means that neither Catalina beta 4 works ?
Yes, euhhh no, euhh well : Catalina beta 4 does NOT work ;)
Scott, my gentle jndi guru, does it make sense to change NamingContext
so that it can understand jndi:, then use for
java.naming.provider.url
something
Vincent,
Is someone in touch with the Tomcat Mailing List ?
Otherwise I'll register
and explain the problem.
Please, yes.
Any other thoughts ?
I thought we could tried with another ejb container (wl for example)
to be sure the problem does not come from the jnp module, but I
Hey Vinay,
[please plain text email]
Hello Folks,
Took a wild shot at the Option D, timed cache invalidation.
Have put it in a separate interceptor that sits before the
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor and invalidates the
EntityEnterpriseContext at regular preset intervals.
I would
you
didn't read the excercise I gave you did you
please
read the excercise vinay it explain a much faster way to do the
"invalidate".
(for
the others, this is in fact one of the excercise we do on the last day of the
training and I wrote it specifically for Vinay but it is now part
Hi,
Yes allright sorry for my bad understanding of jndi, from Simone post on
what catalina is doing, it has more sense now.
Thanks.
Not really because this potentially implies a new protocol. Who
is generating
the jndi://localhost:1099 url? Unless the JNDI spi spec indicates
that jndi:
Vinay,
// The valid variables, make it a hashset
Map validContext;
invoke(MI mi) {
try {
// Use the cache key, it is safe
if (!validContext.contains(((EntityEnterpriseContext)
mi.getEnterpriseContext()).key) {
//The context is not in the map, it will be loaded
Hi,
Suite: org.jboss.test.cts.test.AllJUnitTests
Test:testRemoveSessionObject
Type:failure
Exception: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message: [EJB 1.1, p42] Expected 'RemoveException',
detail:java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in
Simone,
really, this is not a cache decision, AT ALL. The state synchronization is
the state synchronization with the DB, it is a different domain. The cache
should not, does not, will not take state synchronization decisions with
respect to the database. It is a store with passivation
|I would have written a simple TimerTask in a LRU cache policy, as I've done
|for the stateful bean removal.
and I would have removed it
|The issues (entity beans invalidation and stateful beans removal) are very
|similar, aren't they ?
no, like not at all.
One deals with memory of the
|Marc,
|
|Will do over the weekend! Just had time today to give this a try! [and that
|too about 45 mins!]. But I'll see to it that I go thru the material and do
|it the way you'd like to see it work!!
Great... btw I forgot to welcome you and congratulate you for taking the
courageous plunge of
User: starksm
Date: 01/05/11 12:06:25
Modified:tomcat/src/build build.xml
Log:
Updated the tomcat 3.2.1 integration mbean to use the new AbstractWebContainer
mbean and added support for integrated security across web/ejb applications.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13
User: starksm
Date: 01/05/11 12:06:25
Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/ejb/interfaces
StatelessSession.java
Log:
Updated the tomcat 3.2.1 integration mbean to use the new AbstractWebContainer
mbean and added support for integrated security
User: starksm
Date: 01/05/11 12:06:25
Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/servlet HelloEJB.java
Added: tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/servlet
PrintClassLoaders.java
Log:
Updated the tomcat 3.2.1 integration mbean to use the new
User: starksm
Date: 01/05/11 12:06:26
Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat
ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java TomcatEntry.java
Log:
Updated the tomcat 3.2.1 integration mbean to use the new AbstractWebContainer
mbean and added support for integrated
User: starksm
Date: 01/05/11 12:06:25
Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/ejb/bean
StatelessSessionBean.java
Log:
Updated the tomcat 3.2.1 integration mbean to use the new AbstractWebContainer
mbean and added support for integrated security
Bugs item #423428, was updated on 2001-05-11 13:27
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=423428group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
Marc,
Here goes the next version per your instructions! Note that I have to
synchronize for adding the key to the set. Please let me know if this looks
like what you had in mind. And hey, I have removed the stuff from
invokeHome. It will simply chain it to the next interceptor [the sync
Here is the same code but with the TimerQueue and
TimerTask from Simone.
Vinay
/** JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server**
Distributable under LGPL license.* See terms of license at
gnu.org.*/package org.jboss.ejb.plugins;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;import
Marc,
Simone,
really, this is not a cache decision, AT ALL. The state
synchronization is
the state synchronization with the DB, it is a different
domain. The cache
should not, does not, will not take state synchronization
decisions with
respect to the database. It is a store with
Almost,
The name is misleading the ones that are in the map we know for sure that
will be valid since the next interceptor will refresh it, so the name of the
Map is validContexts, and in fact they are NOT ctxToInvalidate.
|/**
| * Collection of context cache keys
| */
|
Marc,
What do we call the class? Do we want to put the refresh rate in the
jboss.xml file? I'd rather see it there than in the jcml file. What do you
think? Also, if we don't have the synchornized block we might have un
predictable results. Assuming that look ups and adds are pretty fast
|Marc,
|What do we call the class? Do we want to put the refresh rate in the
|jboss.xml file? I'd rather see it there than in the jcml file. What do you
You are absolutely right it is a bean based value. Each bean will define the
cache refresh rate.
|think? Also, if we don't have the
Marc,
Have changed the name of the
map!
Also,
standardjboss.xml has a node
optiond-refresh-rate30/optiond-refresh-rate
that is along side the commit-option
node.
that specifies the refresh rate in seconds.
Ifoption d is specified then this value is read to set the refresh rate.
If
Hello All,
Are there any commercial vendors developing
modules or add-ons connected with JBOSS
Is it legal to develop/package commercial
products based on JBOSS?
If there were already discussions on this subject,
point me to those emails or archives.
Thanks
-Aswath
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 66
Come one... just imagine Marc in an alien-suit with those spring shoes
shouting who's the jboss. That would be tops. I don't know if Marc
would be into it, but I sure get a nice chuckle just thinking about it.
Any ways enough of that... definitely a booth.
--jason
On Sat, 12 May 2001, K.V.
Hello,
yes it is legal to develop commercial add-ons to JBoss.
In fact if you wanted to sell it through JBoss.org we would put it on our
download page and charge for every sale. We are a distribution channel and
your sales help pay for the development of the core.
marc
|-Original
Ah the great days when Telkel was fully funded and we could afford a booth
at JavaONE.
This year, i am a guerillero, I come with my weapons loaded my head up but I
really can't buy a booth all for JBoss. I am still wanting a place where
people can find me.
My question is very simple, I am
28 matches
Mail list logo
