Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS Rel_2_4_0_16 changes have been removed

2001-07-16 Thread Vinay Menon
can u pls let me know how i can get the test suite working from within the build scripts? the test script has a compileTest target which only builds the jmx bit. many thanks vinay - Original Message - From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 14,

[JBoss-dev] test

2001-07-16 Thread marc fleury
_tesyt Marc Fleury, Ph.D [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] JBOSS load-ballance with multiple data sources?

2001-07-16 Thread Gonyou, Austin
If an app is accessing mulitple data-sources, and a failure of that jboss server occurrs, what is the recomended failover for jboss to preserve state if it can? (i.e. JBoss has an app which is being used, the server dies(for some reason) and the client session performs a re-request, what

[JBoss-dev] Building a full jboss building with all of the sources

2001-07-16 Thread Nick Betteridge
I've been looking around for either a simple description on how to generate a full build or an ant file doing the same thing. Does anyone have an ant script to do the whole lot in one go? - or have I missed the obvious and there's a doc staring me in the face! Cheers and thanks.

RE: [JBoss-dev] Building a full jboss building with all of the sources

2001-07-16 Thread Sacha Labourey
Hello, - Download the source distribution and unzip it in a folder... let's call it JBOSS. - go in the JBOSS/src/build folder - launch either build.bat or build.sh depending on your platform - after being compiled, the result can be found in the JBOSS/dist

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-441783 ] Is JNP configurable?

2001-07-16 Thread noreply
Bugs item #441783, was opened at 2001-07-16 12:07 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=441783group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v2.2.2 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change

2001-07-16 Thread marc fleury
|When a transaction times out it still should be notifying any threads that |went into |a wait state because of contention with respect to the transaction. If you |want a |quick fix to test that the problem is loss of the end of transaction |notification |simply change this line: | |190

RE: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change

2001-07-16 Thread Brenton House
I am testing the EJB 2.0 capabilities that have been implemented in some of the recent builds from CVS and I have come across this problem. Using jbosscmp-jdbc.xml, I can deploy a simple app. It only has a couple of fields, id (String) and label (String) as getters and setters. When I deploy

[JBoss-dev] JMSContainerInvoker XAConnections

2001-07-16 Thread Thimmaiah Chendrimada
Problem 1. The JMSContainerInvoker looksup JNDI to find the (Topic/Queue)ConnectionFactory from which it creates a (Topic/Queue)Connection. 2. The JMSContainerInvoker never checks if the ConnectionFactory is XA compliant i.e is instanceof

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-441821 ] BMP deploy error msg is AWEFUL

2001-07-16 Thread noreply
Bugs item #441821, was opened at 2001-07-16 14:55 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=441821group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata JawsApplicationMetaData.java

2001-07-16 Thread Bill Burke
User: patriot1burke Date: 01/07/16 19:08:53 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata Tag: Branch_2_4 JawsApplicationMetaData.java Log: Should use type-mapping-definition tag instead of just type-mapping. This also matches the jaws dtd and the

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata JawsApplicationMetaData.java

2001-07-16 Thread Bill Burke
Sorry, I really screwed up with this. I was using a mainline standardjaws.xml not a 2.4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata JawsApplicationMetaData.java

2001-07-16 Thread Bill Burke
User: patriot1burke Date: 01/07/16 19:29:54 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata Tag: Branch_2_4 JawsApplicationMetaData.java Log: Sorry, I'm an idiot. Rolling back to original Revision ChangesPath No revision

Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change

2001-07-16 Thread Jason Dillon
Did you ever have a chance to look into this at all? I am going a little crazy, since our application is heavily JMS based. The previous version was using SwiftMQ, which I dropped so I could use MDBs. My options for a provider are: JBossMQ - This is what I want to use, but... OpenJMS

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins EntityInstanceInterceptor.java

2001-07-16 Thread Bill Burke
User: patriot1burke Date: 01/07/16 21:37:32 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins EntityInstanceInterceptor.java Log: Fixed bug when ejbLoad threw an exception and threads waiting on TxLock did not get awakened. Revision ChangesPath 1.39

[JBoss-dev] new wait(1000) not good

2001-07-16 Thread Bill Burke
Scott, Your 2.2 wait(1000)change will seriously slow down applications that contend for the same Entity. In fact, it may even deadlock if requests for that Entity keep on coming in. The do..while loop does a mutex.acquire at the beginning. It will not do a mutex.release until after the 1

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: manual/src/docs basicconfiguration.xml

2001-07-16 Thread Vincent Harcq
User: vharcq Date: 01/07/16 22:35:39 Modified:src/docs basicconfiguration.xml Log: mention tomcat/specific conf subdirectory (recurrent question) Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +5 -2 manual/src/docs/basicconfiguration.xml Index: basicconfiguration.xml