[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-June-2002

2002-06-02 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 606 Successful tests: 605 Errors:0 Failures: 1 [time of test: 2 June 2002 0:29 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-563448 ] deployment exceptions cause problems

2002-06-02 Thread David Jencks
How about deployment returning lists of successfully deployed mbeans, mbeans waiting for others, and mbeans that failed deployment? Due to the dependency management, many of these mbeans may not be in the package just deployed. To make the original deployer of each mbean get notified we will

Re: [JBoss-dev] Where should the Jasper jar live ?

2002-06-02 Thread Ignacio Coloma
Maybe having to install and learn to manage emacs and custom edit the emacs config to modify the Jetty log system (for example) is a bit too much for the average Windows user. Not my case (I use emacs every now and then), but I see this as a major handicap for spreading use of the JBoss/Jetty

RE: [JBoss-dev] Where should the Jasper jar live ?

2002-06-02 Thread marc fleury
|take all the | |resources out of their ears and deploy them in lib/, then | |just drop the | |dds into deploy/. | |Ok, so they can edit their descriptors - but it's not J2EE, is it ? This is the future yes, for all the deployment types. marcf

[JBoss-dev] new JBoss website KDE's konqueror

2002-06-02 Thread Justin Casp
Hey List, I just wanted to say the new JBoss website looks very nice. However, one thing would make it even better: if it rendered properly in konqueror 3.0.0-2, the KDE 3.0 web browser. The main content area is not bounded by the window; it extends several screen-widths to the right,

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-562004 ] 'Error setting column value' using dependent value classes with existing db records

2002-06-02 Thread Justin Casp
hey List, Since there hasn't been any feedback on this bug yet, I would like to start taking a look at it myself, as it is important for the project I'm working on. I would appreciate any extra developer documentation (UML diagrams would be super) that might be out there that would help me

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-563448 ] deployment exceptions cause problems

2002-06-02 Thread Scott M Stark
I have a problem with the logic described in this bug. If A does not depend on B then its deployment should not be affected in any way by a failed deployment of B, the dependent object for exactly the reason you discuss. Why should the failure of some connection mgr dependent end up failing the

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-562004 ] 'Error setting column value' using dependent value classes with existing db records

2002-06-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #562004, was opened at 2002-05-29 18:11 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562004group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Justin Casp (jcasp) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] new JBoss website KDE's konqueror

2002-06-02 Thread Tobias Frech
Hi Justin, I do see the same problem with an older version of Konqueror AND with Netscape 4.7x. My fix was to remove three NOWRAPs from the HTML source. The needed changes are already in the CVS and should be seen with the next outmated update of the website. Ciao, Tobias Justin Casp wrote:

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-563448 ] deployment exceptions cause problems

2002-06-02 Thread David Jencks
I'm glad we agree there are problems here. What do you think would be the most appropriate behavior? In both cases, the most useful behavior I can' think of is returning lists of mbeans affected by the current deployment ctivity in various states (successfully deployed, waiting for classes,

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-June-2002

2002-06-02 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 606 Successful tests: 605 Errors:0 Failures: 1 [time of test: 2 June 2002 12:29 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-June-2002

2002-06-02 Thread marius
What is that failure? Is it there in 3.0 final also? Are there any failures when running on sun's 1.4? It just stopped when I tried. On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 12:37:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Number of tests run: 606 Successful

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 2-June-2002

2002-06-02 Thread Stephen Coy
Scott, Have you noticed that this URL is broken? On Monday, June 3, 2002, at 05:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See http://lubega.com/testarchive/${build.uid} for details of this test. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS

RE: [JBoss-dev] Where should the Jasper jar live ?

2002-06-02 Thread James Cook
WinZip 8.1 allows you to click on a file to edit it. When you are done, it prompts you whether you want to update the file in the archive. The only braindead thing is it only works with files in the root directory of the archive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 3-June-2002

2002-06-02 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 733 Successful tests: 229 Errors:491 Failures: 13 [time of test: 3 June 2002 1:30 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.0] [java.vendor: IBM Corporation]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-562004 ] 'Error setting column value' using dependent value classes with existing db records

2002-06-02 Thread noreply
Bugs item #562004, was opened at 2002-05-29 14:11 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562004group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Justin Casp (jcasp) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Potential .jar problem in all build.xml(s)

2002-06-02 Thread David Jencks
Are you using xdoclet from xdoclet cvs? Does it build jboss correctly? I would like to upgrade the jboss copy soon and when an xdoclet version is released. I think there is also a plan to move jboss specific code from xdoclet to jboss. There is already an xdoclet include file for mbeans.

[JBoss-dev] Re: [Xdoclet-user] Weird appearing X problem

2002-06-02 Thread Frederick N. Brier
I think I've tracked the problem down. The version of xdoclet.jar that is in the JBoss 3.0 CVS tree has a bug in it. Unzipping the .jar and looking at the binaries, both of the TLD_PUBLICID constants for 1.1 and 1.2 in JspTaglibSubTask.class both say XTag. Very bizarre. I will update the

[JBoss-dev] Re: [Xdoclet-user] Weird appearing X problem

2002-06-02 Thread David Jencks
Please be careful. IIRC, the jboss xdoclet version is tagged in xdoclet source and is ___AFTER___ 1.1.2, and it includes some functionality I added not in 1.1.2 that is used in the build. Please try with the cvs version of xdoclet. If it works I can tag the xdoclet source and get a reproducible