[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-569305 ] Server IP detection causes problems

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #569305, was opened at 2002-06-15 07:35 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=569305group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Samuel Terrell (j3110) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 15-June-2002

2002-06-15 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 612 Successful tests: 611 Errors:1 Failures: 0 [time of test: 15 June 2002 0:29 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-569313 ] ejb-ql parser broken in 3.0.1RC1

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #569313, was opened at 2002-06-15 18:32 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=569313group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] Joining to JBoss Development

2002-06-15 Thread simondiaz
Dear all, I would like to join to the development of JBOSS and I think I need a clear vision of the overall architecture of the system. Could anybody send me a document describing such issue? On the other hand, there is any development task needing help? I think the best way to start is to

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-569439 ] page truncated while loading

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #569439, was opened at 2002-06-15 19:37 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=569439group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paolo Devoti (devotip) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 15-June-2002

2002-06-15 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 612 Successful tests: 611 Errors:1 Failures: 0 [time of test: 15 June 2002 12:29 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test failed

2002-06-15 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.0 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-563988 ] interrupted threads cannot load classes

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #563988, was opened at 2002-06-03 11:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=563988group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harald Gliebe (hagl) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-520892 ] RH hangs during shutdown - cache resize

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #520892, was opened at 2002-02-21 02:02 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=520892group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-567381 ] Multiple hot-redploys cause JVM panic

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #567381, was opened at 2002-06-11 05:34 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=567381group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Simon Stewart (shs96c)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-551335 ] NullPointerException when stopping ORB

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #551335, was opened at 2002-05-02 03:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=551335group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alistair Sheffield

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why does one MBean failure cause the entire deployment unit to fail?

2002-06-15 Thread Scott M Stark
Sure, that makes some sense. There are few issues that need to be addressed with the deployment logic and I plan on looking into next week. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Dave Neuer [EMAIL

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why does one MBean failure cause the entire deployment unit to fail?

2002-06-15 Thread David Jencks
I agree with jason that we should always continue deployment as far as possible and undo as little as possible. We also need to make all problems extremely visible through jmx and possibly logging. With proper dependency specifications nothing that depends on a unsuccessfully deployed mbean

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why does one MBean failure cause the entire deployment unit to fail?

2002-06-15 Thread Scott M Stark
The problem I see is having to establish dependcies on every critical service. Naming for instance is used by nearly every bean so we would have to further complicate the correct setup of services. I would rather have fail fast semantics than uncertain running but not working services. There has

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-564854 ] subscription-durability not optional

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #564854, was opened at 2002-06-05 06:40 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=564854group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Sieroka (sieroka) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-563988 ] interrupted threads cannot load classes

2002-06-15 Thread noreply
Bugs item #563988, was opened at 2002-06-03 11:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=563988group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harald Gliebe (hagl) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] Oracle BLOB handling - FIXED?

2002-06-15 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I just committed the code from patch [ 525663 ] CMP and oracle blobs. Can some with Oracle check if the code actually works? The following command will execute a new test I added which has a field of every type: ./build.sh -Dtest=org.jboss.test.cmp2.simple.SimpleUnitTestCase one-test You'll