RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] Drift between 3.0.1 and 3.1

2002-06-23 Thread marc fleury
excellent, marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott |M Stark |Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:51 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] Drift between 3.0.1 and 3.1 | | |There is no reason main should be

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 23-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 594 Successful tests: 440 Errors:142 Failures: 12 [time of test: 23 June 2002 12:27 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-572396 ] Shutdown error

2002-06-23 Thread noreply
Bugs item #572396, was opened at 2002-06-21 20:31 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572396group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kevin McIntyre (kevin7010)

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 23-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread Scott M Stark
There is a problem with the java:/DefaultDS not being started in the current 3.0 codebase. Running either the all or default configs shows the jboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=hsqldbDS never becoming fully started: [starksm@banshee log]$ grep service=LocalTxDS,name=hsqldbDS server.log 2002-06-23

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-570786 ] FileURLConnection getContentType

2002-06-23 Thread noreply
Bugs item #570786, was opened at 2002-06-18 14:06 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=570786group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Levine (jfl123) Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-group] Drift between 3.0.1 and 3.1

2002-06-23 Thread David Jencks
OK. I want to get the jboss-app.xml for incuding sars and *-service.xml into 3.1 soon. This is intertwined to some extent with teh ear-scoped loader. Do you have a specific idea for a different approach to the ear-scoped loader? I can't really see a substantially different way, although I can

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 23-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread Scott M Stark
I thought these type of failures were going to be logged as errors Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 2:29 PM

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 23-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 640 Successful tests: 636 Errors:1 Failures: 3 [time of test: 23 June 2002 16:22 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 24-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 763 Successful tests: 228 Errors:523 Failures: 12 [time of test: 24 June 2002 1:31 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.0] [java.vendor: IBM Corporation]

[JBoss-dev] no server/*/log dirs in Branch_3_0 build...

2002-06-23 Thread Jules Gosnell
Am I imagining this ? Is it intentional ? If not, could we have one - It means I can run the same Jetty config on both branches (Branch_3_0 HEAD). Cheers, Jules --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 24-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 763 Successful tests: 228 Errors:523 Failures: 12 [time of test: 24 June 2002 3:21 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems

RE: [JBoss-dev] How to specify depens for EJB

2002-06-23 Thread Jason Dillon
I do not believe that helps for an EAR. --jason Quoting marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]: number the deployments marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: [JBoss-dev] no server/*/log dirs in Branch_3_0 build...

2002-06-23 Thread Scott M Stark
There are no log dirs in a clean build but they are supposed to be created as needed. I don't see that happening right now so I'll check into why. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jules

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 24-June-2002

2002-06-23 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 763 Successful tests: 228 Errors:523 Failures: 12 [time of test: 24 June 2002 6:49 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.0] [java.vendor: IBM Corporation]