You can use ant from Eclipse, but you do not have to. Eclipse has its
own incremental java compiler.
Which is cool at first but *very* frustrating for big projects (or when you
update the source lib): it recompiles everything *in the frontground*: you
are blocked, waiting for Mr. Eclipse to
It is not a bad idea. Why was it different? We thought it was easier for a
developer to say clusteredTrue/clustered in jboss.xml than to change a
container configuration.
From the developer standpoint, he wants his bean to be clustered and he
really doesn't care if it requires a new container
Hi,
Sorry, my fault.
Looks like Ant missed a source file dependency, and I should have
rebuilt from scratch before testing before committing to CVS.
The testsuite should compile again now.
I've looked a bit deeper into the exception test, and found a
problem with these two tests:
Hi!
Would like to know how to set the transaction timeout value of session bean
in Jboss.I could do it using the following tag in weblogic...whats the
equivalent in Jboss??(which tag in Jboss.xml)
transaction-descriptor
trans-timeout-seconds120/trans-timeout-seconds
Bugs item #598146, was opened at 2002-08-21 08:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=598146group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre)
Assigned to: Ole
There's a pretty good article on JMX at The Serverside:
http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=AdventnetJMX
As soon as 1.1 final is released I plan to start working on a JMX service based
architecture for
starting, running and managing an Ozone server.
Best regards,
Per
Bugs item #598255, was opened at 2002-08-21 13:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=598255group_id=22866
Category: JBossTest
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrzej E (andrzeje)
Assigned to:
Hi,
I need some help or ideas on what to do with the
exception test in the testsuite.
Problem started when the server was changed so that
deployments fails when a bean does not pass verification
(strict verification).
The local interface of the ExceptionTester bean had
three methods that threw
Bugs item #598255, was opened at 2002-08-21 13:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=598255group_id=22866
Category: JBossTest
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrzej E (andrzeje)
Assigned to:
Hi!
I am working with Jbos3.0 .While trying to create an entity bean i get the
following error?
snapshot of jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
entity
ejb-nameArticleAssignment/ejb-name
table-nameARTICLE_ASSIGNMENT/table-name
cmp-field
field-nameserialNumber/field-name
All clustered does is point the configuration name to a continer configuration
that is the default for clustering.
If you need a new clustered container configuration, then you have to end up
specifying the config name in the jboss.xml descriptor and the clustered element
at the bean level is
The cluster-config element is now supported at the container
configuration level and
can be overriden at the bean level.
when you say it can be overriden at the bean level, you mean you still have
the cluster-config element (as before) in jboss.xml, or do you need to
override the container
Yes, there is a cluster-config element at both the container-configuration and
session/entity
levels. Its not less user friendly to have a user point 100 stateless session beans to
a cutomized container configuration that extends the standard clustered stateless
session
bean container configu
Hi rahul,
You are on the wrong list.
The JBoss-dev list is for discussion of development of
the JBoss server, NOT for user problems.
Probably nobody will answer you here.
You will have better luck at the JBoss-user list, or
the forums at www.jboss.org.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
Bugs item #598255, was opened at 2002-08-21 13:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=598255group_id=22866
Category: JBossTest
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrzej E (andrzeje)
Assigned to:
Yes, there is a cluster-config element at both the
container-configuration and session/entity
levels.
So, that's fine for me.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
Sorry, wrong list...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Per
Nyfelt
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMX
There's a pretty good article on JMX at The
Bugs item #598335, was opened at 2002-08-21 16:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=598335group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kevin Conner (kevinconner)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 11:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss)
Assigned to:
Hi Geeks
Just uploaded Draft 4 of the JBoss 3.0 Quick Start which
only contains some typos fixed and Marc's introduction.
Thanx to Gernot Starke for the review of Chapter 2 and 3.
Have fun
x
Andreas Schaefer
Senior Consultant
JBoss Group, LLC
x
I have finally downloaded and tested this patch with SwiftMQ, and it does indeed
fix the problem. Does anyone object if I go forward with this patch? (Note - I
simplified it a bit, and added some (too much?) commenting).
-Larry
I think I may have tracked down the SwiftMQ bug... let me know
Please do. IMO you can't have too much commenting... but some of the
aliens might disagree.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of lsanders
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Number of tests run: 859
Successful tests: 704
Errors:146
Failures: 9
[time of test: 22 August 2002 2:53 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
23 matches
Mail list logo
