Bugs item #608790, was opened at 2002-09-13 07:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608790group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 4
Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc)
Assigned to:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #600435, was opened at 2002-08-26 22:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600435group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle Downey (kdowney)
Assigned
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #608798, was opened at 2002-09-13 10:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608798group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jan Stolze (jstolze)
Assigned to:
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
¿ìËٵõ½ÄãÏëÒªµÄ!!Ãû¶îÓÐÏÞ
¼ÓÈëËÍ50ÃÀÔª£¬½éÉÜÒ»È˼ÓÈë¸ø50ÃÀÔª¡£±ÈSPEDIA׬ÃÀÔ²¿ìһǧ±¶µÄ·½·¨?ÎÒÎåÌìÒѾ׬ÁË1000ÃÀÔª!£¨ÄÚ¸¶ÍêÈ«¹¦ÂÔ£©
µãÕâÀï¼ÓÈ루µã»÷²»³É ¸´ÖÆ¡¢Õ³Ìùµ½µØÖ·À¸,Èç¹ûÒ»´Î²»ÐоͶàÊÔ¼¸´Î,Ò»¶¨Ðеģ©
http://www.way2win.com
½øÈëway2winÖ÷Ò³Ãæ¡£Äú»á¿´µ½ÓÒ±ßÓм¸¸öС·½¿ò£¬Õâ¾ÍÊÇ×¢²áµÄµØ·½
Well, in my opinion, this should not behave as ms-dos or sco or whatever: it
should behave like Database locks. Even if JBoss let you continue, the DB
won't because you will have two different connections that try to access the
same row = lock.
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 07:43, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Sounds good. What I want to configure is the aspects, not the
interceptors. The interceptors have to arrange themselves, travel to the
client, reside on the server, complement one another, ..
However, I don't really know, what the xml should
Bugs item #608807, was opened at 2002-09-13 10:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608807group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Christen (tgdchmi2)
Assigned
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #600435, was opened at 2002-08-26 15:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600435group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle Downey (kdowney)
Assigned
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #608835, was opened at 2002-09-13 10:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608835group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alasdair MacLeod (macleoa)
Assigned
Scott group,
Turned out to be a networking issue on my end. Everything seems to be
working fine now. Thanks for the info.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:58 AM
To:
Bugs item #608837, was opened at 2002-09-13 10:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608837group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alasdair MacLeod (macleoa)
Assigned
Patches item #608841, was opened at 2002-09-13 11:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=608841group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Thexton (davidthexton)
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
I'll see what I can do for the 3.2 beta this weekend.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Marcus Redeker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:32 PM
A 3.2 beta will go out this weekend.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
25 matches
Mail list logo
