[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610392 ] MarshalException In Remote Invocation

Bugs item #610392, was opened at 2002-09-17 06:53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610392group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Towles (wonderslug) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] MarshalException for Remote Invocation (610392)

Howdy all Repeating what be bug said.. (just for frame of reference) -- A Marshaling Exception is being thrown the remote invoker when any remote EJB function is called (inter-jboss). Even when using Tyrex as a transaction manager. This is being caused by the Transaction

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-582428 ] ejb remove cause IllegalStateException

Bugs item #582428, was opened at 2002-07-16 22:33 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=582428group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Lau (andrewlau4) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608458 ] subdeployments in wsr

Bugs item #608458, was opened at 2002-09-12 18:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608458group_id=22866 Category: JBossSOAP Group: v4.0 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] Sun and Jboss

http://java.sun.com/features/2002/09/opn_src_cooper.html TH folowing is from a interview with Danese Cooper posted on java.sun.com Question: JBoss Compatibility In a recent survey, a lot of developers want to know when Sun will allow JBoss to be branded as compatible with Java technology.

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610008 ] Verifier too strict for 2.0 cmp 1.1 home

Bugs item #610008, was opened at 2002-09-16 18:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610008group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Christian

RE: [JBoss-dev] Sun and Jboss

Hmmm... I thought only the JBoss Group services were a for-profit project, whereas the JBoss open source server was a non-profit project. But maybe I am wrong in this distinction? Randahl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] libraries.ent

David, I have rewritten the libraries.ent file in the applications cvs project to have each library check if the files are in the thirdparty directory, and only then declare the properties and classpath. I think this is a better solution to the library problem because it moves the decision

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

Re: [JBoss-dev] MarshalException for Remote Invocation (610392)

I haven't looked at the code, I've just been thinking about how to make the jboss tm distributed. First, until the jboss tm is distributed, it seems to me that problems invoking an ejb on another server from inside a tx using the jboss tm are appropriate, since the tx can't be propagated. Using

[JBoss-dev] jboss-all daily clean failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

Re: [JBoss-dev] libraries.ent

I think this is a big improvement, thanks david jencks On 2002.09.17 05:12:01 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote: David, I have rewritten the libraries.ent file in the applications cvs project to have each library check if the files are in the thirdparty directory, and only then declare the

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

sorry.. forgot to add my renamed file. Should be fixed now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Should modelmbean forward MBeanRegistration calls to managedresource?

The question is not should but can? :-) The spec requires the MBeanServer to invoke the ModelMBean's pre/post[De]Register. It is silent on whether the ModelMBean forwards that to the pojo. The pojo implementing the interface should be enough configuration shouldn't it? Regards, Adrian From:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610531 ] JMSXGroupID Property unusable

Bugs item #610531, was opened at 2002-09-17 15:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610531group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lars Klose (klosels) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610552 ] PrefixDeploymentSorter and non-digit URL

Bugs item #610552, was opened at 2002-09-17 16:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610552group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-609902 ] java.lang.LinkageError: loader ...

Bugs item #609902, was opened at 2002-09-16 15:47 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=609902group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610008 ] Verifier too strict for 2.0 cmp 1.1 home

Bugs item #610008, was opened at 2002-09-16 09:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610008group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Christian

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610008 ] Verifier too strict for 2.0 cmp 1.1 home

Bugs item #610008, was opened at 2002-09-16 18:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610008group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Christian

Re: [JBoss-dev] Should modelmbean forward MBeanRegistration calls to managed resource?

OK, that's what I implemented. If we find that interceptors need to see these calls we can revisit the question. thanks david jencks On 2002.09.17 09:02:46 -0400 Adrian Brock wrote: The question is not should but can? :-) The spec requires the MBeanServer to invoke the ModelMBean's

[JBoss-dev] No security context set in ejbCreate() of SFSB

JBoss 3.0.2: This is related to Bug ID: 608807. The EJB 2.0 specification allows a call to SessionContext.getCallerPrincipal() in the ejbCreate() method of the Statefull Session Bean. When called from a remote (not in the same VM) client, this throws IllegalStateException: No security

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610008 ] Verifier too strict for 2.0 cmp 1.1 home

Bugs item #610008, was opened at 2002-09-16 18:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610008group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] MarshalException for Remote Invocation (610392)

Tyrex has makes use of the OTS (jts corba stuff) and has a TransactionPropogationContext (TPC) which wraps the OTS propogation context. The OTS has XA resources as well as Xids that are externalizable. So yes this is done by the tyrex plugin specifically. It takes the TPC on an import and

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610552 ] PrefixDeploymentSorter and non-digit URL

Bugs item #610552, was opened at 2002-09-17 06:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610552group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610008 ] Verifier too strict for 2.0 cmp 1.1 home

Bugs item #610008, was opened at 2002-09-16 09:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610008group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] No security context set in ejbCreate() of SFSB

Yes, the usage is inconsistent. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Peter Levart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:14 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] No

[JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-cvs] jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/persistence ObjectStreamPersistenceManager.java OsPersistMgr.java

Juha group, I figured I missed a few i's and t's in there... Is this the JavaStyle plugin for JEdit? I can't seem to get it to work at the moment. But assuming I do, is there profile / rule-set for the jboss coding conventions I can import, or do I need to enter them in by hand? Are

[JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-cvs] jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/persistenceObjectStreamPersistenceManager.java OsPersistMgr.java

I use jEdit 4.0 final with the latest JavaStyle plugin from the plugin central. Seems to work (and the JavaStyle plugin has gone a long way since the last version I used). I entered the parameters in the plugin GUI by hand. I assume it stores the config somewhere I'll check if I can find the

Re: [JBoss-dev] Sun and Jboss

AFAIK you are right. The license is free. Is Linux somehow not free because RedHat sells, distros, support consultancy on the back of it ? Jules Randahl Fink Isaksen wrote: Hmmm... I thought only the JBoss Group services were a for-profit project, whereas the JBoss open source server

Re: [JBoss-dev] Sun and Jboss

The problem is not has Sun considers JBoss for-profit because of the association with The JBoss Group. The problem is Sun won't let The JBoss Group purchase access to the TDK like any other company. The won't give it to JBoss and they won't let The JBoss Group buy it, so they effectively

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 17-September-2002

Number of tests run: 932 Successful tests: 915 Errors:11 Failures: 6 [time of test: 17 September 2002 13:12 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-595672 ] Deserialization broken in JBoss 3.01

Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 13:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-609247 ] read-only messes up commit-option D

Bugs item #609247, was opened at 2002-09-14 07:37 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=609247group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Vilcans (marvil) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608720 ] J2EE EJB Compat with J2EE SDK Server

Bugs item #608720, was opened at 2002-09-12 22:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608720group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anthony Ikeda (akikeda) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608798 ] BIT/boolean mapping

Bugs item #608798, was opened at 2002-09-13 03:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608798group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jan Stolze (jstolze) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] Thinlet and the JBoss Console GUI?

Has anyone looked into Thinlet (http://www.thinlet.com) as a possible widget set for a GUI console? Looks promising... fast... but I haven't looked into it very deeply. --jason --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-606812 ] Table not removed from db on undeploy

Bugs item #606812, was opened at 2002-09-09 16:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=606812group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Da C (dacu) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-606812 ] Table not removed from db on undeploy

Bugs item #606812, was opened at 2002-09-09 16:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=606812group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Da C (dacu) Assigned to: Dain

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610843 ] Caching of JaasSecurityManager.DomainInf

Bugs item #610843, was opened at 2002-09-18 01:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610843group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timo Warns (timow) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610843 ] Caching of JaasSecurityManager.DomainInf

Bugs item #610843, was opened at 2002-09-17 16:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610843group_id=22866 Category: JBossSX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timo Warns (timow) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608720 ] J2EE EJB Compat with J2EE SDK Server

Bugs item #608720, was opened at 2002-09-13 13:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608720group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anthony Ikeda (akikeda) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-606812 ] Table not removed from db on undeploy

Bugs item #606812, was opened at 2002-09-09 11:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=606812group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Da C (dacu) Assigned to: Dain

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608720 ] J2EE EJB Compat with J2EE SDK Server

Bugs item #608720, was opened at 2002-09-13 13:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608720group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anthony Ikeda (akikeda) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608720 ] J2EE EJB Compat with J2EE SDK Server

Bugs item #608720, was opened at 2002-09-12 22:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608720group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anthony Ikeda (akikeda)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608720 ] J2EE EJB Compat with J2EE SDK Server

Bugs item #608720, was opened at 2002-09-13 13:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608720group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anthony Ikeda (akikeda)

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD Matrix2) Testsuite Results: 18-September-2002

Number of tests run: 658 Successful tests: 355 Errors:284 Failures: 19 [time of test: 18 September 2002 0:50 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun

[JBoss-dev] Problem with mbean dispatcher? jboss 4

There appears to be something very wrong with the generated mbean dispatcher, causing datasources not to deploy and most of the tests to fail. Apparently under some circumstances a method is invoked twice: 2002-09-17 19:42:31,111 INFO [org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer] sar deployer, 1

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-610898 ] sync-on-commit-only

Change Notes item #610898, was opened at 2002-09-17 22:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=610898group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v4.0 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-610896 ] sync-on-commit-only

Change Notes item #610896, was opened at 2002-09-17 22:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=610896group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-610897 ] sync-on-commit-only

Change Notes item #610897, was opened at 2002-09-17 22:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=610897group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-608202 ] EJBQL fails to compile

Bugs item #608202, was opened at 2002-09-12 15:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608202group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cory Prowse (cosmic) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610907 ] Using JMS in MDB/container-managed TX

Bugs item #610907, was opened at 2002-09-17 20:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610907group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-610531 ] JMSXGroupID Property unusable

Bugs item #610531, was opened at 2002-09-17 08:15 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610531group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lars Klose (klosels) Assigned to: