RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 4.0 Entity Redesign

2002-10-20 Thread Bill Burke
I'm looking at Hiram's aspect stuff and will try to implement client-side interceptors with this new framework. After that i would like to move to the containers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of marc fleury

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 4.0 Entity Redesign

2002-10-20 Thread David Jencks
On 2002.10.20 19:46:52 -0400 marc fleury wrote: Sounds good, When are we planing on converting the interceptor to having only a single invoke method? I can easily do this with a new abstract interceptor that breaks into the two methods based on invocation type. Any objections?

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 4.0 Entity Redesign

2002-10-20 Thread marc fleury
I think for simplicity we should have only stateless interceptors, any interceptor can store per-stack state in a the stack top in a hashmap. I rewrote the mbean interceptors this way, it works fine, but then juha committed a completely different reimplementation. David there is no

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 4.0 Entity Redesign

2002-10-20 Thread Hiram Chirino
Previously we were on opposite sides of this debate:-) I think for simplicity we should have only stateless interceptors, any interceptor can store per-stack state in a the stack top in a hashmap. This was the way I created the aspect stuff initially. The interceptors were tottaly statless.

[JBoss-dev]

2002-10-20 Thread classad

[JBoss-dev]

2002-10-20 Thread classad