When some outstanding bugs due to be fixed in 3.0.4 are fully tested.
A day, or two perhaps.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Kuckartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hello,
Exactly, it may help to solve one of the current biggest issue wrt
configuration: any configuration done through any GUI (or mbean, etc.) is
not persisted = only transient configuration can be started remotly or
programatically. Having a generic way to build new persisted mbean
definition
Hello Sacha,
I thought about it too. As alternative or other implementation of
MBean persistence. Though, I am not familiar with MBean persistence stuff yet.
Are they meant to be serialized as java objects?
I think, having MBeans persisted in xml form is much better. Because I
can see what is
I am thinking about this stuff of reconfiguring and redeployment.
It would be cool to have metadata of the deployed apps to be exposed
for modifications through jmx-console. And not only for changing
existing attributes but adding some resource references etc.
Then one can modify some stuff and
... and making these changes persistent! ;)
Yes, that would be really cool
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]De la part de Alex
Loubyansky
Envoye : lundi, 28 octobre 2002 10:03
A : Anatoly Akkerman
Objet : Re[2]:
Bugs item #617574, was opened at 2002-10-02 07:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=617574group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Bartmann (bartmann)
Assigned to: Scott M
Yes. And by the way there are to ways.
The first is MBean persistence.
The second is changing the app's DDs themself.
As I understand right, Anatoly uses the last one.
alex
Monday, October 28, 2002, 11:46:57 AM, you wrote:
SL ... and making these changes persistent! ;)
SL Yes, that would be
Scott M Stark wrote:
I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly:
2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10
2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4
Is the 3.0.4 release on ?
I haven't seen anything over the weekend indicating yes - but then I
haven't seen a no either
Have I missed
A sudden rush of mail has answered my question for me.
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Scott M Stark wrote:
I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly:
2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10
2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4
Is the 3.0.4 release on ?
I haven't seen anything over the
Alex group,
I've meant to add some MBean persistence docs, but haven't gotten to it
yet. IMO, *-service.xml *is* a form of persistence. It represents state of
the server that is present after server restart. It is great, flexible,
easy to understand, etc., but with all due respect, not
Patches item #629903, was opened at 2002-10-28 15:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=629903group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rich Tong (rtong)
Assigned to:
Patches item #629915, was opened at 2002-10-28 15:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=629915group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rich Tong (rtong)
Assigned to:
did anyone used jboss to checkout jboss??
I did it, in the jboss repository i choosed branch Branch_3_0 and module
jboss-3.0
and when i try to executed through build.sh i got :
~/eclipse/workspace/jboss-3.0/build ./build.sh
Searching for build.xml ...
Buildfile:
I've just found it builds with j2sdk 1.4 (my problems mentioned
below occured only with jdk 1.3).
If it's not intentional, could anyone who's more familiar
with the build system look at it and try to fix it (or say
it does work for him? :-)
Thanks
Pavel
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Pavel Kolesnikov
Feature Requests item #630002, was opened at 2002-10-28 20:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=630002group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Maxim (kimerinn)
Assigned to:
Hello David,
DJ how does what you want differ from the *-ds.xml deployer in 3.2 and 4?
just dealing with JMX agent view and not XML files. I think, it
would be easier, especially to start, to use some GUI instead of XML.
I am not talking about datasources only. Do you really think it's an
Bugs item #620890, was opened at 2002-10-09 10:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620890group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Theo Harper (btharper)
The 3.0 build system will not work out of the box. You can probably hackup
your environment to get it to work, or you can use the build.[sh|bat]
scripts.
--jason
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços wrote:
did anyone used jboss to checkout jboss??
I did it, in the
Hi,
I am trying to track this down - but I am not getting anywhere - can
someone point me at the buildmagic docs - I thought it was on the
jboss site - but I can't find it.
What does this execmlodules task require? It was working before the
recent changes.
I could just hardcode the call - its
Bugs item #626893, was opened at 2002-10-22 12:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=626893group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Emerson Cargnin (echofloripa)
Assigned to:
i'm using the build.sh as you can see in my previous email.
the problem is when checking-out using eclipse or using command line cvs
commands. In the last it work nice, but in eclipse it doens't. I'd like
to use eclipse so i can do a synchronize looking exacly what have change
from builds to
Bugs item #591835, was opened at 2002-08-06 22:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=591835group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Dain Sundstrom
Bugs item #620440, was opened at 2002-10-08 13:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=620440group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Don Laidlaw (dlaidlaw)
Bugs item #471714, was opened at 2001-10-16 06:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=471714group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
Send me the output from `find ~/eclipse/workspace/jboss-3.0/tools`
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Emerson Cargnin
-
SICREDI Serviços
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Hallo db gurus,
we have for some time experienced nasty timeouts on oracle
without jboss deadlock detection (or oracle deadlock detection)
kicking in. We might have found the solution today, allthough
this is not verified, perhaps only time will show.
(...or some db guru will tell me that my
Check this link.
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:1513219::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:292016138754,%7Bprimary%7D%20and%20%7Bkey%7D%20and%20%7Bupdate%7D%20and%20%7Btable%7D%20and%20%7Block%7D
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bartmann
if you read carefully the above bug you will see that it's a oracle
issue, the solution here will not generate any orderby, but when it's
used (jboss-ql order by) it uses the fields in orderby clause in the
select [fiels] where ...
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
Will this be something that is
Number of tests run: 984
Successful tests: 982
Errors:1
Failures: 1
[time of test: 28 October 2002 12:55 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 20:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Agreed. This should be a flag in the datasource mapping.
-dain
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
I saw that it was Oracle specific, but I didn't see it mentioned that it
only kicked in when using the JBoss-QL order-by.
Also, I still think it would be useful to have it only kick in for databases
that
What is the problem?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Kimpton
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is the testsuite not working - or is it just
me?
Hi,
I
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 16:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Catalin Teodorescu wrote:
Check this link.
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:1513219::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:292016138754,%7Bprimary%7D%20and%20%7Bkey%7D%20and%20%7Bupdate%7D%20and%20%7Btable%7D%20and%20%7Block%7D
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Michael
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 13:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Hmmm.. if I understand this paper right,
it would mean that the child table is only
locked if:
a) one deletes records of the parent table
or
b) if one changes the pk value in the parent table.
which would not not be as bad as I thought when reading
other sources, which imply that a simple update
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 20:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 16:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Check out also the Oracle doc for the version you use.
There are some improvements in 9i.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bartmann [mailto:michael.bartmann;lisytec.de]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 13:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Oracle, table locks and
danch wrote:
Even ignoring the table-lock escalation issue, this is what should
happen. In fact, I'm a little surprised that Oracle doesn't just create
the indices: I believe PostgreSQL does.
I believe it's because they want to allow a DBA to configure the index in a
specific way e.g. in a
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 13:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #589808, was opened at 2002-08-01 16:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=589808group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Bergman (davber)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #564411, was opened at 2002-06-04 08:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=564411group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.1
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Meier (llucifer)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #617585, was opened at 2002-10-02 07:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=617585group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: PEte Clark (pc3)
Assigned
Bugs item #617574, was opened at 2002-10-03 00:20
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=617574group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Bartmann (bartmann)
Assigned to: Scott M
I have an easy task for someone who is looking to help out. I want to
get the README.* LICENSE.* files sorted out for all of the /thirdparty
repository. Some modules do not have them, some do. Some are in odd
locations and in differing formats.
So, the task is to:
a) Come up with a standard
Bugs item #625277, was opened at 2002-10-18 08:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=625277group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dani G. (danig)
Assigned to: Scott M Stark
Apache commons collections has been imported in apache-commons.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Loubyansky
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Jason Dillon
Subject: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] can't add a dir to
Bugs item #624653, was opened at 2002-10-17 06:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=624653group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marco Ladermann (mpl)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #624494, was opened at 2002-10-17 00:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=624494group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)
Will this be something that is configurable per datasource type or mandated
in JBossCMP as the default? Will there be any way to tell JBoss *not* to add
these order bys in the event we don't want them?
Hunter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:57:13
Bugs item #624449, was opened at 2002-10-16 22:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=624449group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Archimedes Trajano (trajano)
Bugs item #621485, was opened at 2002-10-10 10:59
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621485group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned
Bugs item #623223, was opened at 2002-10-14 13:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=623223group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jerome Lacoste (lacostej)
Bugs item #619171, was opened at 2002-10-06 00:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=619171group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Timur Zambalayev (timurz)
Bugs item #608412, was opened at 2002-09-12 07:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608412group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel
I saw that it was Oracle specific, but I didn't see it mentioned that it
only kicked in when using the JBoss-QL order-by.
Also, I still think it would be useful to have it only kick in for databases
that require it... The behavior required by Oracle isn't part of the SQL
spec is it?
Hunter
57 matches
Mail list logo
