[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-574130 ] Remote UserTransaction fails name lookup

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #574130, was opened at 2002-06-26 15:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=574130group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon Swinth (jswinth) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634362 ] Failure if EntityBean overrides hashCode

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634362, was opened at 2002-11-06 11:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634362group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Lipp (mlipp) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634362 ] Failure if EntityBean overrides hashCode

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634362, was opened at 2002-11-06 11:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634362group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Michael Lipp (mlipp) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, Still not completing - although it seemed to have got to the stress tests today - but I did let it run for around 11 hours this time... Has anyone else run the full testsuite on HEAD recently? How long did it take - on what machine? I am using a 600mhz P3, redhat7.1 box. Thanks, Chris

Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...

2002-11-06 Thread Adrian Brock
Hi Chris, I ran head tests yesterday, there are still time-outs relating to the trunk invokers, but it does complete. Windows XP 1Ghz P3 java 1.4 Mandrake 8.1 450Mhz P2 java 1.3 Have you tried a thread-dump to see whether there is a deadlock? Regards, Adrian From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634286 ] Bug in the transactional locking code

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634286, was opened at 2002-11-06 02:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre) Assigned to: Bill Burke

Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi Adrian, How long did it take on your Mandrake machine? Less than 11hours, I bet. I presume I can send a kill signal (SIGHUP) to the jvm to get a thread-dump? Are you running them all at once, or individual tests? I am just running the tests target from the testsuite module. Regards,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-634495 ] Poor Error message in EJB deployer

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Patches item #634495, was opened at 2002-11-06 15:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=634495group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steinar Hansen (shansen5) Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...

2002-11-06 Thread Adrian Brock
Answers in line. Regards, Adrian From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems... Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 07:41:55 -0800 (PST) Hi Adrian, How long did it take on your Mandrake machine? Less than

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634286 ] Bug in the transactional locking code

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634286, was opened at 2002-11-06 07:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre) Assigned to: Bill Burke

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-621664 ] test hangs with 3.0.3 but passes 3.0.2

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #621664, was opened at 2002-10-10 21:18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621664group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634591 ] netboot failure

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634591, was opened at 2002-11-06 19:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634591group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ryan sonnek (wireframe6464) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634646 ] ejb-ql - LIKE

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634646, was opened at 2002-11-06 15:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634646group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Calvin (cwu9t9) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases

2002-11-06 Thread Jules Gosnell
What has happened to the 3.2beta release ? I have some stuff to put in - am I to late ? Jules Scott M Stark wrote: I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly: 2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10 2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4 2002-11-03jboss-3.0.2beta2 2002-12-22

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 6-November-2002

2002-11-06 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 989 Successful tests: 985 Errors:4 Failures: 0 [time of test: 6 November 2002 12:51 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634677 ] EJB in ja in server lib dir auto-deploys

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634677, was opened at 2002-11-06 21:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634677group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Colin Sampaleanu (colins) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] Customizing JBoss server configurations

2002-11-06 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Hi, I've created an ant script that allows easy creation of custom jboss server configurations (other then all, default and minimal). Basically, it defines a bunch of targets like jbossmq, transaction-manager and alike from which you can assemble your own unique server. I am using this script

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634646 ] ejb-ql - LIKE

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Bugs item #634646, was opened at 2002-11-06 14:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634646group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Calvin (cwu9t9) Assigned to: Dain

RE: [JBoss-dev] Customizing JBoss server configurations

2002-11-06 Thread Bill Burke
Yes that is a great idea. What kind of script? sh, perl, python, java, ?? I've done the same for the CD subscription but using InstallAnywhere. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko Sent:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases

2002-11-06 Thread Scott M Stark
Go ahead. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases

RE: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases

2002-11-06 Thread James Higginbotham
Scott, Can you or someone on the team tell me which version I should upgrade our product to - 3.0.x or 3.2? I'm about to move from 3.0.0 and want to make sure I'm on the right branch to make migration to 4.0 easier in the future while remaining stable for our product release that will occur by

RE: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases

2002-11-06 Thread Bill Burke
Personally I'd stay with 3.0.x series. New functionality will not be added to it while it will with 3.2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of James Higginbotham Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:47 PM To:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-634830 ] Added Unicast Detector

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #634830, was opened at 2002-11-07 01:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=634830group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Haynie (jhaynie) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-634831 ] Added remote class loading

2002-11-06 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #634831, was opened at 2002-11-07 01:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=634831group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Haynie (jhaynie) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Clustering problem

2002-11-06 Thread Vishal Shukla
Hello, I am facing problem in JBoss Clustering.I am having Two nodes in cluster.When One node is down.Client Automatically send request to other node.But if any node is getting the exception like.. Could not create entity:org.jboss.util.NestedSQLException: No ManagedConnections Available!;

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Clustering problem

2002-11-06 Thread Bill Burke
Only communication exceptions will cause a failover. If the client proxies know that the request was delivered, the clustering code will never failover. This is to avoid duplicate invocations and also the client proxies really have no way of knowing what you want to do with a request.