RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-06 Thread Tom Elrod
I did this while in process of doing checkin. Should be fixed in a minute. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev]

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-06 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.3.1_06" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Scott M Stark
Agreed. I don't want that management headache propagated to 4.0. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003

RE: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Nathan Phelps
Make that 4 cheers! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Elrod Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build 3 cheers for Scott! --

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-629145 ] ejb-link bug

2003-03-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #629145, was opened at 2002-10-26 19:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=629145&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Wachter (stefanwachter) Assigned to: Chr

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I got no problem making 99% of CMP working on 1.3 (basicially anything that does not require JDBC3). It is just the #ifdef stuff I hate. -dain On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 10:49 PM, Scott M Stark wrote: Originally I said I thought we needed to keep 4.0 buildable by JDK 1.3, but I'm starting t

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
There's no requirement from JMX to use 1.4 yet. (excluding JSR160/Remoting) On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Scott M Stark wrote: > Originally I said I thought we needed to keep 4.0 buildable by JDK 1.3, > but I'm starting to think otherwise. I'm about to give in to this demand. > If users cannot switch to J

RE: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Tom Elrod
3 cheers for Scott! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Scott > M Stark > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build > > > Originally I said I thought we nee

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Scott M Stark
Originally I said I thought we needed to keep 4.0 buildable by JDK 1.3, but I'm starting to think otherwise. I'm about to give in to this demand. If users cannot switch to JDK 1.4 then I'm willing to say they cannot make use of the full set of features in 4.0. The remaining question I had was can t

RE: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Tom Elrod
+2, but already out ranked in earlier thread on same topic -Tom > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Jason > Dillon > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build >

Re: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 04:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: What is left over is: org.jboss.cmp (I am guessing this is some of the new cmp framework) This is our new generic persistence code. Jason can you add a new empty module 'persistence' for us and we'll move the stuff over. org.jbos

RE: [JBoss-dev] UnifiedClassLoader notifications?

2003-03-06 Thread Bill Burke
What about the entire UCL itself? In AOP I have a Javassist type object that is paired with each UCL that I need to cycle when the UCL is done. Right now I have explicit calls in the ULR code to trigger this. Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
Well it is still possible to separate the two w/o unified interceptors. Not including the bits from org.jboss.cmp (this stuff is very independent) there are about 150+ classes which are not directly dependent on the bits from org.jboss.ejb (and related). Some bits are forced to remain in jboss

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 6-March-2003

2003-03-06 Thread scott . stark
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1067 Successful tests: 1062 Errors:1 Failures: 4 [time of test: 2003-03-06.12-04 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-698962 ] BMP deployment of ECperf fails

2003-03-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #698962, was opened at 2003-03-06 12:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=698962&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Assigned to: Nobody/Ano

Re: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
I am chill... are you? --jason On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 02:26 AM, Bill Burke wrote: then don't do it and chillThis split is not very important. I am working on it Monday. I'm doing benchmarks the next 2 days. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Bill Burke
then don't do it and chillThis split is not very important. I am working on it Monday. I'm doing benchmarks the next 2 days. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason > Dillon > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTE

[JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
Any idea when this will become reality for HEAD? The spaghetti interceptor model is making the separation of EJB bits from the server module very hairy if not impossible. --jason --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of Total

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
+1 to required JDK 1.4 for HEAD --jason On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:59 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Is JDK 1.4 now required to build? If not when are we going to add this requirement? I need an IdentityHashMap for the ObjectCopier and would like to encapsulate and delegate to IdentityHashM

[JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Is JDK 1.4 now required to build? If not when are we going to add this requirement? I need an IdentityHashMap for the ObjectCopier and would like to encapsulate and delegate to IdentityHashMap for JDK 1.4 (because of speed) and for JDK 1.3 I will just is an IdentityKey wrapper. This code wil

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-698682 ] DynamicQL concurrency problem

2003-03-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #698682, was opened at 2003-03-06 09:47 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=698682&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka (mhnagaoka)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-679705 ] 3.0.6 fails to start with AbstractMethodError on IBM 1.4 VM

2003-03-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #679705, was opened at 2003-02-03 20:40 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=679705&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Pending >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Kuehnel (skuehnel

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-692817 ] JDBCOptimisticLock fails under heavy load

2003-03-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #692817, was opened at 2003-02-25 11:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=692817&group_id=22866 >Category: JBossCMP >Group: v3.2 Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Simone (milasx) >Assigned to: Alexey Loub

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-688613 ] Class loader problem

2003-03-06 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #688613, was opened at 2003-02-18 13:50 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=688613&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: None >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shyam Sundar (shyamvs) Assigned to: Nob

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 6-March-2003

2003-03-06 Thread scott . stark
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1138 Successful tests: 1131 Errors:7 Failures: 0 [time of test: 2003-03-06.07-55 GMT] [java.version: 1.4.1_

Re: [JBoss-dev] UnifiedClassLoader notifications?

2003-03-06 Thread Scott M Stark
A loader repository sends a "jboss.mx.class.removed" event type with a message value equal to the class name for each class being removed when a class loader is removed from the repository. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC ---