[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712542 ] Touching an EAR in /farm deletes it

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712542, was opened at 2003-03-31 10:19 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712542group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure) Assigned to: Sacha

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712542 ] Touching an EAR in /farm deletes it

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712542, was opened at 2003-03-31 10:19 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712542group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure) Assigned to: Sacha

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712654 ] setting CatalinaBase attribute breaks .war deployment

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712654, was opened at 2003-03-31 15:00 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712654group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rauli Priha (rpriha) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712686 ] ear deployment broken

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712686, was opened at 2003-03-31 14:21 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712686group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712687 ] ear deployment failure

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712687, was opened at 2003-03-31 14:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712687group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712687 ] ear deployment failure

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712687, was opened at 2003-03-31 14:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712687group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-711346 ] Trying to return anTrying to return an unknown connection2!

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #711346, was opened at 2003-03-28 13:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711346group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shyam Sundar (shyamvs) Assigned to: David Jencks

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710204 ] ra.xml does not pass validation

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 18:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710204group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming) Assigned to: David Jencks

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-666701 ] Incompatibility in run.sh (: not found)

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #666701, was opened at 2003-01-12 08:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=666701group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Arentz (sateh) Assigned to: Scott M

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-675984 ] Deploument descriptors are locked - no redeploy possible

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #675984, was opened at 2003-01-28 01:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=675984group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rickard Öberg (rickardoberg) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-701924 ] Bundled tar.gz for 3.2.0RC3 is not source code

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #701924, was opened at 2003-03-11 18:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=701924group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christopher G. Stach II (cstach)

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Burke
Sorry Peter, no offesne, but But could somebody explain what the hell he just posted? Sacha, pointed out McKoi. I'd like to see how good of a DB this is. Anybody have any experience with it? Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of

RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Burke
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some other popular Java based web scripting. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of julien viet Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:57 PM To: marc fleury Subject: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 doesn't run on IBM JDK?

2003-03-31 Thread Scott M Stark
I'll look into it. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Francisco Reverbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:51 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 doesn't run on

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-712495 ] Use *-ds.xml files in 3.2 for all jca adapters.

2003-03-31 Thread Scott M Stark
So if people are using the 3.0 style descriptor or earlier versions of the *-ds.xml descriptor, are they are going to have dependency problems? Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710204 ] ra.xml does not pass validation

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 10:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710204group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming) Assigned to: David Jencks

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-708762 ] transacted JMS Managed Connection Not Initialized Correctly

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #708762, was opened at 2003-03-24 04:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=708762group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Bandler (paulbandler) Assigned to: Scott M

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-31 Thread Adrian Brock
Translated in line, Fagerlund-English Never used Mckoi. From cvs it doesn't look very active (but that might mean it is stable?) and it is all one developer? e.g. http://cvs.mckoi.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mckoi-sql/src/com/mckoi/database/ Regards, Adrian From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] Seeing suprious exception on shutdown in 3.2 now

2003-03-31 Thread Scott M Stark
After fully synching my 3.2 branch I'm seeing garbage exception being dumpbed on shutdown of the server. Why are these showing up now? 11:48:10,636 INFO [STDOUT] Mon Mar 31 11:48:10 PST 2003 SHUTDOWN : System.exit() was not called 11:48:10,646 INFO [LocalManagedConnectionFactory] exception

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-31 Thread Sacha Labourey
I had a dream! That one day, babelfish will be able to understand AND TRANSLATE Peter songs. Nice try Adrian, but you've abandonned on the last part! ;) like a iteration of min 1k for a deploy/undeploy repeted test for thejbossteam ploy deploy ... resulting in a non mem fatigue - then

[JBoss-dev] Re: Seeing suprious exception on shutdown in 3.2 now

2003-03-31 Thread Scott M Stark
The same class is causing an exception on startup as well: 11:53:51,826 INFO [PersistenceManager] Starting 11:53:51,946 INFO [LocalManagedConnectionFactory] exception trying to create exception sorter: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:

[JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues

2003-03-31 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Hello, guys Since the website was switched to Nukes, Mozilla 1.2 on Win2K consistently pops up connection refused. IE6 works fine. Any ideas what is wrong? -- Anatoly. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues

2003-03-31 Thread Scott M Stark
The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Anatoly Akkerman [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues

2003-03-31 Thread marc fleury
which is Scott's long winded way of saying negative -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues The 1.3 release of

[JBoss-dev] NUKES DEVELOPMENT

2003-03-31 Thread marc fleury
OK, guys Nukes from what we can tell is a MASSIVE success. Well you can't see it yet, in the sense that it happily runs behind the scenes on www.jboss.org and the CPU is a .1% utilization (on a new upgraded box granted). But by and large it does what we needed it to do which was copy the

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues

2003-03-31 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
works with 1.2.1 + w2k too The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original

[JBoss-dev] Re: Re[4]: php5 is coming

2003-03-31 Thread Renaud Bruyeron
Is the compilation service for Nukes or for jboss in general? Why is JSP not good for Nukes (isn't Nuke a web application?)? For general compilation service, have you looked into Eclipse's compiler? I think the cocoon folks were/are looking into JDT as an alternative to the pizza compiler. -

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues

2003-03-31 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Well, I don't know what was wrong. After upgrade to 1.3 it works fine. Sorry to bother you people. Juha-P Lindfors wrote: works with 1.2.1 + w2k too The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

[JBoss-dev] forums search

2003-03-31 Thread Felipe Oliveira
hi jboss team, the search on the forums page doesn't seem to be working. i search for mod_proxy and no results. then i search for apache and no results. and then again i search for java and no results. felipe --- This SF.net email is

RE: [JBoss-dev] forums search

2003-03-31 Thread Sacha Labourey
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2 /doc/jk/workershowto.html http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0. 2/doc/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felipe

RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Burke
Igor, I couldn't replicate this. BUT...I think I may have fixed the problem. This is probably a relic, but the Instrumentor code was adding a InvocationTargetException to the throws clause of every instrumented method. I have removed this. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP

2003-03-31 Thread Adrian Brock
Hi Bill, I changed the ejb verifier to allow InvocationTargetException. I'll disallow it again :-) Regards, Adrian From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:24 -0500 Igor, I couldn't

[JBoss-dev] EJB conversion to AOP Interceptor and Invocation

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Burke
I'll be converting EJBs and Invokers to use the new AOP Invocation and Interceptor objects/interfaces starting Wednesday. Let me know if you have any problem with this. Regards, Bill --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712789 ] Server will not start on linux with IBM JDK 1.4.0

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712789, was opened at 2003-03-31 09:31 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712789group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Scott M

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-679705 ] 3.0.6 fails to start with AbstractMethodError on IBM 1.4 VM

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #679705, was opened at 2003-02-03 10:40 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=679705group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Kuehnel (skuehnel)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712789 ] Server will not start on linux with IBM JDK 1.4.0

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712789, was opened at 2003-03-31 09:31 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712789group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Scott M Stark

[JBoss-dev] Jboss DTDs disappeared from the web site

2003-03-31 Thread Stefan Reich
None of the DTDs that used to live in http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/ are accessible anymore, the requests get redirected to the home page. I assume this is an oversight. Stefan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated

Re: [JBoss-dev] Partition merge and service state merge algorithm

2003-03-31 Thread Bela Ban
David Klimek wrote: Hi Sacha, thank you very much for your comments. Now I believe I have quite clean picture of partition merge issues. Maybe the conditions and limitations you mentioned should be added to documentation as they are not obvious and there can be a lot of people living, as I

RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options

2003-03-31 Thread Sacha Labourey
Don't worry if you don't understand Peter's posts, it is like American music for French people: just something you have to listen and enjoy, without understanding the words. Peter is somehow jboss-dev's official poet. Make... letters play and ! Ho here a dot playing with a ^column. Klafuti,

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss DTDs disappeared from the web site

2003-03-31 Thread Scott M Stark
The DTDs have been restored to the website. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Stefan Reich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:59 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev]

RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-31 Thread marc fleury
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some other popular

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Burke
Again, you have the problem of primitive types. These would require field interception which is slow. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela Ban Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-712686 ] ear deployment broken

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #712686, was opened at 2003-03-31 05:21 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=712686group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine) Assigned

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-712495 ] Use *-ds.xml files in 3.2 for all jca adapters.

2003-03-31 Thread David Jencks
The format of datasource *-ds.xml files hasn't changed. You can now also use tx-connection-manager (etc) tags to deploy any resource adapter. If you want to use the plain mbean deployment descriptors you have to move the ManagedConnectionFactoryName attribute from the connection manager mbean

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-706213 ] EARDeployer deploying EJBs not listed in application.xml

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #706213, was opened at 2003-03-19 03:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=706213group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew May (amayingenta) Assigned to: Scott

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Seeing suprious exception on shutdown in 3.2 now

2003-03-31 Thread David Jencks
Oops, I tried to do too many things at once. should be fixed. david On 2003.03.31 14:55 Scott M Stark wrote: The same class is causing an exception on startup as well: 11:53:51,826 INFO [PersistenceManager] Starting 11:53:51,946 INFO [LocalManagedConnectionFactory] exception trying to

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-705542 ] Errorenous IllegalStateException on CMR-Collection

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 12:53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Partition merge and service state merge algorithm

2003-03-31 Thread Sacha Labourey
Hello Bela, Yes, we need some kind of policy. But I thought about something a little bit different. In fact, there is already a way for services that have state to know about partition merging and plug into it. Instead I thought about a policy where you can receive events when you are no more on

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-602828 ] Need a shared class loader notion

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #602828, was opened at 2002-08-31 05:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=602828group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-696381 ] JGStore not setup to use correct class loader

2003-03-31 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #696381, was opened at 2003-03-02 22:59 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=696381group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Jules

Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-31 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Yeah. JSP would be good cause it's a common skill set, has a lot of available tools and extensions (JSTL, etc...) and is a proven tech. From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:52:08 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev]