===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
03:58:53,756 WARN [NamingContext] Failed to connect to localhost:1099
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
head: /home/jbossci/jbossci2/logtests/testresults/reports/text/TESTS-T
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.InvocationLayerStressTest
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1346
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.lock.test.EnterpriseEntityStressTes
A recent change broke the links to
http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_2.dtd and other DTDs.
Stefan
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com
JBossMQthe current code basewill continue to ship with JBoss 3.2 which is,
and will remain for some time, the production version. Therefore, making
changes to the current code base IS NOT worthless. However, I am working on
a brand new implementation with assistance from Adrian, Bela, Bill, Tom
Bugs item #754096, was opened at 2003-06-13 17:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=754096&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution
Bugs item #754086, was opened at 2003-06-13 16:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=754086&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Please forget last question, I think I got it ! ( Sometimes reading the next page helps :-)
Sorry
Ulf
JSR77 specifies in JSR77.3.1.1.1 as required key property for OBJECT_NAME. I don't see this property as part of the ObjectName attribute of a managed object via JMX console. Just filtered or not implemented ?
Regards
Ulf
Can anyone give me some informations about the current state of the announced rewrite of JBossMQ for JBoss 4 ? Does it still make sense to implement needed features on the current JBossMQ implementation ? I don't want to spend time on something that gets nuked in short time :-)
Regards
Ulf
This is
an advertisment, if you are not interested, please kindly delete it or
press the Remove to remove from our
mailing list. Sorry for causing any inconvenience!! Our products: 1)Used Mini-lab machines/Used
Photo-finishing machinesMost update
Hi,
The auto rebuild job failed to get the code from cvs most of
yesterday.
Thanks,
Chris
=
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
---
14 matches
Mail list logo