Hi Nathan,
thanks for the information. I already have seen your first CVS code. Is there any further information available about the planed design and feature set ? You already gave some interesting insights about the p2p feature. When using jms in an enterprise production environment - as we
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
09:24 Jun 16
java version 1.4.1_02
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment,
Bugs item #559628, was opened at 2002-05-23 17:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aparup
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=559628group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Hi Ulf,
(2) message redelivery / message throttling clustering / failover
since Nathan's design is based on JavaGroups, these issues are
JavaGroups issues:
- Message retransmission is handled by JavaGroups.
- Failover: what do you understand by failover ?
- Throttling: we are working on a
Ulf,
Our primary goal with JMS reloaded is to address the items you highlighted.
Adrian and I had a very interesting discussion about number one, and Bill and I
discussed clustering a bit in SF last week. So we are certainly focused on
number 1 and 2. Number 3 is less of a concern to me
On the marketing front...
Reloaded for the matrix is a great idea but will have too short a
shelflife :) plus what we are doing is truly revolutionary so... Start
hooking your wagon on that marketing speed train,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Nathan's design will not be based on JavaGroups, but will rather use
JavaGroups as one type of transport mechanism. I would rather see JBoss
Remoting used as an abstraction with JavaGroups as a plugin rather than
JavaGroups at the center of things.
BUTdon't let this requirement hold you up
Bill Burke wrote:
Nathan's design will not be based on JavaGroups, but will rather use
JavaGroups as one type of transport mechanism.
Don't get all nervous; that's what I meant. 2 transports, one is the
traditional c/s, the other one is implemented using JavaGroups.
I would rather see JBoss
I'm pretty excited about the JavaGroups implementation. Should scale quite
well. I also really liked the idea of the AppServer being just another
subscriber for durable topics. Should be interesting how all this develops
over the next few months.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
As Bela and I have recently discussed with Tom Elrod, we all think that
exposing JavaGroups as a transport of the remoting framework is indeed the best
approach. However, I struggle with how the client-server nature of the
remoting framework maps to the client-client nature of mulicast. I
Title: Hello
Hello,
Now you can have a full featured voice chat solution and much more
for
a fraction of the cost that has been available until now.
Please take a moment to compare:
» One low payment starting at $50.00
with No annual fees .
» Extremely user friendly
» Excellent sound
Bugs item #751495, was opened at 2003-06-09 18:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=751495group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
This is not consistent with the move to extract the metadata parsing from the current
deployers into filters or interceptors associated with the deployers. The key issue is
to support transformation of multiple versions of the various descriptors into metadata
used by the current deployer.
Bugs item #753718, was opened at 2003-06-13 03:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=753718group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1347
On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 01:53 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
This is not consistent with the move to extract the metadata parsing
from the current
deployers into filters or interceptors associated with the deployers.
The key issue is
to support transformation of multiple versions of the various
The XSLSubdeployer is acting as an interceptor and a deployer. The transformation
activity needs to be factored out from the subdeployer behavior. It makes no sense
to add subdeployers that really do not deploy anything simply to achive the side effect
of an interceptor.
Futher, the deployers
A clean checkout of the current head branch is failing to complete correctly due to
the following
errors:
20:24:23,979 INFO [EJBDeployer] Creating
20:24:23,996 INFO [EJBDeployer] Created
20:24:23,998 INFO [XSLSubDeployer] Creating
20:24:24,032 ERROR [XSLSubDeployer] Initialization failed:
Bugs item #755690, was opened at 2003-06-17 09:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=755690group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #755690, was opened at 2003-06-17 09:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amanpreet_1980
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=755690group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #755690, was opened at 2003-06-17 07:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhalindfors
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=755690group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
deployment
On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 01:53 PM, Scott M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
deployment
The XSLSubdeployer is acting as an
23 matches
Mail list logo
