[JBoss-dev] Deployment error
Hi, Don't know if it is my setup. But I got the following deployment error on the latest Jboss head when running run.sh. BTW, I am running Cygwin from Wins XP. 2003-07-28 22:24:52,093 DEBUG [org.jboss.management.j2ee.MBean] Failed to initialze state from: jboss.aop:service=AspectDeployer java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1 at org.jboss.management.j2ee.StateManagement.setState(StateManagement.java: 188) at org.jboss.management.j2ee.MBean.postCreation(MBean.java:158) at org.jboss.management.j2ee.J2EEManagedObject.postRegister(J2EEManagedObje ct.java:250) at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invokePostRegiste(AbstractMBean Invoker.java:660 ... Any clue? Email me if you want more details. Thanks, -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779397 ] IOException in EmbeddedCatalinaService41 on AS/400
Bugs item #779397, was opened at 2003-07-29 09:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779397group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gary Trend (mikaves) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IOException in EmbeddedCatalinaService41 on AS/400 Initial Comment: Embedded catalina service fails to start on AS/400. Relevant Exception lines are: IOException: bad path error java/io/File.getCanonicalPath()Ljava/lang/String;+10 (File.java:448) org/jboss/web/catalina/EmbeddedCatalinaService41. startService()V+0 (EmbeddedCatalinaService41.java:179) The problem is really the line 204 in the EmbeddedCatalinaService41.java. 204 File homeDir = new File(homePath, ../../..); 205 catalinaHome = homeDir.getCanonicalPath(); AS/400 JVM cannot handle ../../... I think a better way to do this would be 204 File homeDir = new File(homePath).getParentFile(). getParentFile().getParentFile(); I tried this code (jboss-3.2.1_tomcat-4.1.24) on AS/400 and Win2000 and I can see the jmx-console on both platforms. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779397group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779397 ] IOException in EmbeddedCatalinaService41 on AS/400
Bugs item #779397, was opened at 2003-07-29 08:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lqd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779397group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gary Trend (mikaves) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IOException in EmbeddedCatalinaService41 on AS/400 Initial Comment: Embedded catalina service fails to start on AS/400. Relevant Exception lines are: IOException: bad path error java/io/File.getCanonicalPath()Ljava/lang/String;+10 (File.java:448) org/jboss/web/catalina/EmbeddedCatalinaService41. startService()V+0 (EmbeddedCatalinaService41.java:179) The problem is really the line 204 in the EmbeddedCatalinaService41.java. 204 File homeDir = new File(homePath, ../../..); 205 catalinaHome = homeDir.getCanonicalPath(); AS/400 JVM cannot handle ../../... I think a better way to do this would be 204 File homeDir = new File(homePath).getParentFile(). getParentFile().getParentFile(); I tried this code (jboss-3.2.1_tomcat-4.1.24) on AS/400 and Win2000 and I can see the jmx-console on both platforms. -- Comment By: Christian Riege (lqd) Date: 2003-07-29 12:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176671 Fixed in Branch_3_0, Branch_3_2 and HEAD. Thanks. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779397group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment error
A debug level message is not a deployment error. Is this actually preventing a deployment? -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Ben Wang wrote: Hi, Don't know if it is my setup. But I got the following deployment error on the latest Jboss head when running run.sh. BTW, I am running Cygwin from Wins XP. 2003-07-28 22:24:52,093 DEBUG [org.jboss.management.j2ee.MBean] Failed to initialze state from: jboss.aop:service=AspectDeployer java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1 at org.jboss.management.j2ee.StateManagement.setState(StateManagement.java: 188) at org.jboss.management.j2ee.MBean.postCreation(MBean.java:158) at org.jboss.management.j2ee.J2EEManagedObject.postRegister(J2EEManagedObje ct.java:250) at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invokePostRegiste(AbstractMBean Invoker.java:660 ... Any clue? Email me if you want more details. Thanks, -Ben --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-779635 ] EJB-QL to traverse CMR with different datasources
Feature Requests item #779635, was opened at 2003-07-29 17:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=779635group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ionel GARDAIS (ze_ioio) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: EJB-QL to traverse CMR with different datasources Initial Comment: This feature will allow EJB-QL and JBOSS-QL queries to traverse relationship when beans on each CMR side have differents datasources. i.e : Bean A w/ datasource dsA Bean B w/ datasource dsB By now using BeanB inside BeanA works but a query that uses the relationship between these two beans fails. The exception thrown complains that BeanB's table is not present under dsA. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=779635group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779797 ] no bindaddress configuration for RMI JNDI
Bugs item #779797, was opened at 2003-07-29 14:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779797group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Assigned to: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Summary: no bindaddress configuration for RMI JNDI Initial Comment: There is no way to define the BindAddress for the RMI server object of the Naming service. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779797group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-779712 ] HANamingService needs SecurityDomain attribute
Feature Requests item #779712, was opened at 2003-07-29 17:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=779712group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rob Dickinson (rob_dickinson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HANamingService needs SecurityDomain attribute Initial Comment: The HANamingService doesn't currently support a SecurityDomain attribute, so it cannot enlist a standard org.jboss.security.ssl.RMISSLServerSocketFactory. If you want to do HA-JNDI/SSL, you have to write your own socket factory that doesn't depend on SecurityDomain, but instead assumes a security domain name or is configured in some other way (system property). -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=779712group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] () , !!@
Title: [] [] * .* [] ! ! ! ! / ! () ! , , ! , SMTP, SMTP ! SMTP ! ! ! ! , , ! , ! A/S, , ! , .[] .. . If you feel that this information is not what you want, please click [HERE] requesting to be removed. Thank you, and we apologize for any inconvenience. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-779895 ] Defaulting an Optimistic Locking Strategy
Feature Requests item #779895, was opened at 2003-07-29 22:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=779895group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aaron Cheeseman (znwo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Defaulting an Optimistic Locking Strategy Initial Comment: When using optimistic locking, as your locking scheme in the standardjboss.xml you are required to include a optimistic locking strategy for all your defined entities. I believe it would be useful to provide a default strategy that could be setup in the standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml, which is picked up if no locking strategy has been specified in the entity definition. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=779895group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779953 ] jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect
Bugs item #779953, was opened at 2003-07-30 10:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779953group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect Initial Comment: It is missing the nested method element. It is currently: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method-name, read-only?) and should be: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method*) !ELEMENT method (method-name, read-only?) I see that the 3.2 dtd also has an idempotent element, but I've not checked to see if this is a feature in 3.0 or not. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779953group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === === [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.DeploymentUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.071 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.JCA15AdapterUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.666 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.JDBCStatementTestsConnectionUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13.965 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.LocalWrapperCleanupUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 15.99 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jca.test.LocalWrapperCleanupUnitTestCase FAILED [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.MessageEndpointUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 12.051 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.ReentrantUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13.598 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.UserTxUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.338 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.WrapperSQLUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.771 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.XAExceptionUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 19.819 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.XAResourceUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.674 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.XATxConnectionManagerUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.829 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmsra.test.RaQueueUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 4.379 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jmsra.test.RaQueueUnitTestCase FAILED [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmsra.test.RaSyncRecUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 11.828 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jmsra.test.RaSyncRecUnitTestCase FAILED [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmsra.test.RaTopicUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 4.041 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jmsra.test.RaTopicUnitTestCase FAILED [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.CPManifestUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.502 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.DeployConnectionManagerUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 11.341 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jmx.test.DeployConnectionManagerUnitTestCase FAILED [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.DeployServiceUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.65 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.DeployXMBeanUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.038 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.EarDeploymentUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.906 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.EjbDependencyUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13.793 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JarInSarJSR77UnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.913 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JarInSarJSR77UnitTestCase FAILED [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JavaBeanURIResolverUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.271 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.MBeanDependsOnConnectionManagerUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.992 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.MBeanDependsOnEJBUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.613 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.MissingClassUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.108 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.ServiceRsrcsUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.853 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.UndeployBrokenPackageUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 25.938 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jmx.test.UnpackedDeploymentUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 23.107 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jrmp.test.CustomSocketsUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 11.318 sec [junit]
[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Results: 96 % ( 794 / 827 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== === === JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 827 Successful tests: 794 Errors:26 Failures: 7 [time of test: 2003-07-30.01-19 GMT] [java.version: 1.4.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.] [java.vm.version: 1.4.1_03-b02] [java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM] [java.vm.info: mixed mode] [os.name: Linux] [os.arch: i386] [os.version: 2.4.20-18.7] See http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/linux1/logtests/testresults/reports/html//. for the junit report of this test. NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone. It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate! DETAILS OF ERRORS Suite: RemotingUnitTestCase Test:testClusteredRemotingDT2(org.jboss.test.aop.test.RemotingUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: org.jboss.tm.JBossRollbackException Message: Unable to commit, tx=TransactionImpl:XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=11d1def534ea1be0x123b25cxf6b0958ac2x-7fff/101, BranchQual=11d1def534ea1be0x123b25cxf6b0958ac2x-7fff/] status=STATUS_ROLLEDBACK; - nested throwable: (java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected exception in commit of xid: XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=11d1def534ea1be0x123b25cxf6b0958ac2x-7fff/101, BranchQual=11d1def534ea1be0x123b25cxf6b0958ac2x-7fff/1], exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error processing InternalInvocation. Unable to process method commit) - Suite: Scheduler2UnitTestCase Test:testXMLScheduleProvider(org.jboss.test.util.test.Scheduler2UnitTestCase) Type:failure Exception: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError Message: Not enough or too many (19) hits received: 10 - Suite: TransientMBeanUnitTestCase Test:testPutTx(org.jboss.test.cache.test.trans.TransientMBeanUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.rmi.ServerException Message: EJBException:; nested exception is: javax.ejb.EJBException: Application Error: tried to enter Stateful bean with different tx context, contextTx: TransactionImpl:XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=11d1def534ea1be0x123b25cxf6b0958ac2x-7fff/101, BranchQual=11d1def534ea1be0x123b25cxf6b0958ac2x-7fff/1], methodTx: null - Suite: TransientMBeanUnitTestCase Test:testRollbackTx(org.jboss.test.cache.test.trans.TransientMBeanUnitTestCase) Type:failure Exception: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError Message: MBeanException: org.jboss.cache.LockingException: IdentityLock.attempt(); - nested throwable: (java.lang.InterruptedException) Cause: org.jboss.cache.LockingException: IdentityLock.attempt(); - nested throwable: (java.lang.InterruptedException) - Suite: TransientTreeCacheLockingUnitTestCase Test: testConcurrentAccess(org.jboss.test.cache.test.trans.TransientTreeCacheLockingUnitTestCase) Type:failure Exception: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError Message: org.jboss.cache.TimeoutException: IdentityLock.acquireReadLock(): lock could not be acquired after 1ms (lock is owned by null) - Suite: ByHandUnitTestCase Test:java.net.MalformedURLException: no protocol: /home/jbossci/jbossci/jboss-head-test/testsuite/output/lib/jbossdo-byhand.jar Type:error Exception: java.net.MalformedURLException Message: no protocol: /home/jbossci/jbossci/jboss-head-test/testsuite/output/lib/jbossdo-byhand.jar - ===Wed Jul 30 02:26:55 BST 2003 ===Linux nog 2.4.20-18.7 #1 Thu May 29 08:32:50 EDT 2003 i686 unknown ===java version 1.4.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_03-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_03-b02, mixed mode) --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779971 ] jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect
Bugs item #779971, was opened at 2003-07-30 11:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779971group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect Initial Comment: It is missing the nested method element. It is currently: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method-name, read-only?) and should be: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method*) !ELEMENT method (method-name, read-only?) I see that the 3.2 dtd also has an idempotent element, but I've not checked to see if this is a feature in 3.0 or not. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779971group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779971 ] jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect
Bugs item #779971, was opened at 2003-07-30 11:39 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by scoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779971group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect Initial Comment: It is missing the nested method element. It is currently: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method-name, read-only?) and should be: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method*) !ELEMENT method (method-name, read-only?) I see that the 3.2 dtd also has an idempotent element, but I've not checked to see if this is a feature in 3.0 or not. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779971group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-779953 ] jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect
Bugs item #779953, was opened at 2003-07-30 10:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by scoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779953group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jboss_3_0.dtd method-attributes element is incorrect Initial Comment: It is missing the nested method element. It is currently: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method-name, read-only?) and should be: !ELEMENT method-attributes (method*) !ELEMENT method (method-name, read-only?) I see that the 3.2 dtd also has an idempotent element, but I've not checked to see if this is a feature in 3.0 or not. -- Comment By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Date: 2003-07-30 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=463096 Fixed by copying the correct element declarations from jboss_3_2.dtd. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=779953group_id=22866 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment error
Scott, You are right. It doesn't seem to prevent a deployment, but maybe still an anomaly. Thanks, -Ben === Message: 5 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 05:39:26 -0700 From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: JBoss Group To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment error Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A debug level message is not a deployment error. Is this actually preventing a deployment? -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
