Bugs item #796177, was opened at 2003-08-27 14:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by patriot1burke
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=796177group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 14:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 14:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bcotton969
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
I'm trying to compile the 3.2 snapshot with Sun's 1.3.1_07 jdk. It seems
that org.jboss.tm.TxUtils.java is trying to use a RuntimeException
constructor with Throwable parameter. But that ctor is only available in
1.4. Has support for 1.3.1 been abandoned, or is this a bug?
It can be coaxed
Fixed, it now uses org.jboss.util.NestedRuntimeException
Regards,
Adrian
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 16:26, Rod Burgett wrote:
I'm trying to compile the 3.2 snapshot with Sun's 1.3.1_07 jdk. It seems
that org.jboss.tm.TxUtils.java is trying to use a RuntimeException
constructor with Throwable
Ok, I wouldn't be able to improve raw, over-the-wire, remote performance
without breaking compatibility with older JBoss versions.
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
Only problem here is that what I've done so far is not backward
compatible with a previous version of JBoss. I guess this is important.
I'd rather not maintain something like that. What do you think?
IMHO, we should guarantee over-the-wire compatibility only for a
specific branch. over-the-wire compatibility should be breakable
between major releases.
Adrian Brock wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 23:00, Bill Burke wrote:
Ok, I
You guys are talking about a 3.3 proxy talking to a 3.2 server?
If that is the case, it is not really relevant as most proxies are
dynamically generated. Or are you talking about portability of
interceptors working on the Invocation objects?
The stability of 3.2 and its performance are
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 00:27, marc fleury wrote:
You guys are talking about a 3.3 proxy talking to a 3.2 server?
3.2.1 proxy talking to 3.2.2 server or vice versa.
If that is the case, it is not really relevant as most proxies are
dynamically generated. Or are you talking about
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 14:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bcotton969
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #804491, was opened at 2003-09-11 07:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by belaban
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=804491group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
BÝZÝMLE ÇALIÞMAK ÝSTERMÝSÝNÝZ ?
DALTONS KÝMDÝR;
1996 yýlýnda Galatasaray Lisesi'nde okurken, gençlere yönelik organizasyon
sektöründeki arzýn talebi karþýlamadýðýný farkýna varan 4 genç giriþimcinin
yarattýklarý oluþum, ilk olarak kendi çevrelerindeki gençler için düzenledikleri
Uludað ve
14 matches
Mail list logo
