RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-group] RE: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread Sacha Labourey
That was different issues: 1) Scripting is a way to modify an EXISTING DEFAULT JBoss instance by changing its settings. My proposal was going further than BSH by having a higher-level API to manage the server itself. 2) Categorization of the deployment directories: this is to make some cleanup

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread Holger Baxmann @ mac
Am 05.11.2003 um 04:07 schrieb Scott M Stark: Its required for j2ee1.4, but you don't need an xsd to use xsl to transform and xml document. ... as we all know. But this is only one side of the mirror. The question is: What if you use XSLT on XSD? The answer is: You are applying different

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread Holger Baxmann @ mac
The problem is not writing the right code or using the right OM. The problem is applying the right code with a appropriate OM at the right time to the right understanding, taxonomy and onthology of the USER. Code doesn't sell, the right functionalities at the right times will sell. Today we

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread Holger Baxmann @ mac
Thanks for pointing me at this :) I rather think of the special JBoss.org (in my case the not-JAAS-JavaSecurity, JMX, Service and Adapter parts) metamodel additions. Maybe sometimes a XSLT of the spec xsd will do the trick ;-))) thanks b/readingax When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-833558 ] ClassCastException in NamingContext

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #833558, was opened at 2003-10-31 03:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juanmartinez You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=833558group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

Re: [JBoss-dev] Can't exec sendmail

2003-11-05 Thread Tobias Frech
Hi! I replaced the script with a working version. Now the logging works. I did a test to make sure I did not brake anything this time. Sorry for the inconvience I caused before. The live log can be seen now at the Freenode.org network (irc.freenode.org) in the #commits channel. Some more

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-833558 ] ClassCastException in NamingContext

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #833558, was opened at 2003-10-31 03:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juanmartinez You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=833558group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-836499 ] HA-JNDI multicast reply not reaching client

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #836499, was opened at 2003-11-05 15:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=836499group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread Scott M Stark
Give me an example of this meaningful description of an applied security model that needs to be mapped into a declarative j2ee security descriptor. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote: ... And,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-832561 ] NoSuchMethodException when HAJNDI joins cluster

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #832561, was opened at 2003-10-29 10:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=832561group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-836592 ] run.sh -b ip doesn't work

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #836592, was opened at 2003-11-05 17:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=836592group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] US Stock Market: AZAA - Military Aircraft Related Stock...Deon

2003-11-05 Thread Abe Bacon
US Stock Market - UP On the NEWS...AZAA BREAKING NEWS - TUCSON, Ariz.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Arizona Aircraft Spares, Inc. (OTCBB: AZAA) - one of the leading military aircraft spare parts manufacturers - announces it has signed a letter of commitment with Wolfe and Turner Investments to obtain a 6

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread Holger Baxmann
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:36:33 -0800, Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Give me an example of this meaningful description of an applied security model that needs to be mapped into a declarative j2ee security descriptor. The security of the whole system, where j2ee is only a part of, is less

[JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-05 Thread Scott M Stark
I'm putting together a 3.2.3RC1 release to pickup some recent bug fixes. I'm working on a fix for [ 832561 ] NoSuchMethodException when HAJNDI joins cluster that I want to include. If there are any other must have fixes let me know. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer

[JBoss-dev] Null ServiceContext in depends lists

2003-11-05 Thread Scott M Stark
I'm seeing a few NPEs on shutdown in the current 3.2 branch that appear to be due to pulling null ServiceContexts from depends list and its not clear how this is happening or what changed recently to introduce this. Two examples: 07:19:53,872 ERROR [SARDeployer] Could not stop mbean:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-829734 ] JBossIIOP incorrectly uses Server Bind Address as OA address

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #829734, was opened at 2003-10-24 17:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=829734group_id=22866 Category: JBossIIOP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-11-05 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Compilation failed

2003-11-05 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Test Results: 95 % ( 1522 / 1598 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-11-05 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Scott M Stark wrote: I'm putting together a 3.2.3RC1 release to pickup some recent bug fixes. I'm working on a fix for [ 832561 ] NoSuchMethodException when HAJNDI joins cluster that I want to include. If there are any other must have fixes let me know. This will include Tomcat 4.1.29, with a

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-828093 ] Problems registering interceptors with JacORB inside JBoss

2003-11-05 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #828093, was opened at 2003-10-22 09:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=828093group_id=22866 Category: JBossIIOP Group: v3.2 Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Test Results: 95 % ( 1522 / 1598 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-11-05 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===