[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840536 ] Oracle 9iR2: same table in diff. schema

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840536, was opened at 2003-11-12 08:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840536group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-824187 ] NPE in UnifiedClassLoader.findResources()

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #824187, was opened at 2003-10-15 17:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cgjung You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=824187group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate

AW: [JBoss-dev] JNDI lookup problem with webservice client

2003-11-12 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Thomas, Another possibility of binding webservices into JNDI is using references and an associated ServiceFactory (see the behaviour of external web service references in jboss.net). With that approach, you have more control about the serialisation process, classloading issues and engine

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840582 ] Transaction tests wrong status

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840582, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840582group_id=22866 Category: JBossTest Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-840598 ] J2EE client application deployment support added

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Change Notes item #840598, was opened at 2003-11-12 01:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=840598group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840449 ] Exceptions from CMR iterator of NotSupported RO bean

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840449, was opened at 2003-11-12 04:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840449group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Rejected

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840536 ] Oracle 9iR2: same table in diff. schema

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840536, was opened at 2003-11-12 09:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840536group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Accepted

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-716887 ] Incorrect length function syntax for Sybase

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #716887, was opened at 2003-04-07 20:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pilhuhn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=716887group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-716887 ] Incorrect length function syntax for Sybase

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #716887, was opened at 2003-04-07 20:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pilhuhn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=716887group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-716887 ] Incorrect length function syntax for Sybase

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #716887, was opened at 2003-04-07 20:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pilhuhn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=716887group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840885 ] UnifiedClassLoader3 is not threadsafe

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840885, was opened at 2003-11-12 18:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840885group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-717751 ] Error binding to a DATETIME column in Sybase

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #717751, was opened at 2003-04-08 22:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pilhuhn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=717751group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840885 ] UnifiedClassLoader3 is not threadsafe

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840885, was opened at 2003-11-12 18:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by adrianprice You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840885group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840885 ] UnifiedClassLoader3 is not threadsafe

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840885, was opened at 2003-11-12 10:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840885group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840885 ] UnifiedClassLoader3 is not threadsafe

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840885, was opened at 2003-11-12 10:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840885group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Testsuite Compilation Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

RE: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Jim Brownfield
I tried to check out the LA bootcamp, but all I get is garbage when I click on the link. I've seen this before on other pages under jboss.org. I tried deleting the cache and forcing a reload, but nothing seems to make it readable. I'm using I.E. 6 under Windows XP Pro. -- Jim Brownfield

Re: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Scott M Stark
I have IE60sp1 with winxp pro and the bootcamp link looks fine: http://www.jbossgroup.com/index.html?module=htmlop=userdisplayid=services/training/bootcamp#losangeles Not sure what the issue could be. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

RE: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Jim Brownfield
I click on your link, and I get a page full of the following: [vwrtT]/9qTK(E4}\t )R'nvM`0]om'ds~%]*]Ro3r | T_ZMO LQ)9B0*/(;]e t/$N#qqb-2IT|N-}Me!/'.3m'49bBKu2Bl-RiM!4,U~8 I?%'H6xM3Y e ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ep?YMyb64J[/?kk|xTt3;,ua!.a}=ZD`h0=7

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-435958 ] Out of Memory eception after many redepl

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #435958, was opened at 2001-06-24 21:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hal200 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=435958group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

Re: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Scott M Stark
The www.jbossgroup.com is using gzip compression. You probably are suffering from this IE issue which is not supposed to exist in 6.0, but people have expierenced it: Internet Explorer Loses the First 2048 Bytes of Data That Are Sent Back by Web Servers That Use HTTP Compression

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-841085 ] Regression with RMIAdaptor replacement in 3.2.2

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #841085, was opened at 2003-11-12 16:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=841085group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-840496 ] Cocoon war dir hot-redeploy causes JBoss Shutdown

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #840496, was opened at 2003-11-11 20:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=840496group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None

RE: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Jim Brownfield
It's possible, but I don't have any of the listed Registry entries that are supposed to be indicative of that particular problem. The main jboss.org page works fine. Other links work fine as well (obviously, I haven't exhaustively checked all links on the page). However, when I click on the

Re: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Scott M Stark
Still looks ok after clearing all offline content and files. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Jim Brownfield wrote: It's possible, but I don't have any of the listed Registry entries that are supposed to be indicative of

RE: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Jim Brownfield
I right-clicked to Open in New Window, received a blank new window then clicked the refresh button and was finally able to see the uncompressed page. Weird -- Jim Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Radical System Solutions, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1583 / 1666 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

RE: [JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread Jim Brownfield
I think I discovered the source of the problem, but not the exact reason. The problem has something to do with the anti-popup proxy server (Proxomitron). When I turned off the proxy, everything suddenly started working. Just FYI. -- Jim Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Radical System Solutions,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-825766 ] Deadlock when logging trace

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #825766, was opened at 2003-10-17 15:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=825766group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1559 / 1643 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-841136 ] ResourceBundle classloader errors

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #841136, was opened at 2003-11-12 18:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=841136group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-841136 ] ResourceBundle classloader errors

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #841136, was opened at 2003-11-12 18:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=841136group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-841136 ] ResourceBundle classloader errors

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #841136, was opened at 2003-11-12 18:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=841136group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1541 / 1629 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-12 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] West coast TRAINING

2003-11-12 Thread marc fleury
Guys, We will be in LA for bootcamp THIS WEEKEND. So if you are on the west coast, come. I will there and you can ask me all the question about the latest stuff as well as Scott Stark who will talk about the upcoming 3.2.3 release. Adrian brock (JMX, JMS, AOP) will be there from the UK and

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-841136 ] ResourceBundle classloader errors

2003-11-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #841136, was opened at 2003-11-12 18:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=841136group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

Re: Joe Admin User mail services Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [Core] WG: Comparison between BEA JBoss

2003-11-12 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 11/10/03 8:18 AM, Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In order to load the org.jboss.mail.userrepository.MetaInfoImpl class from the codebase, you are going to have to catch the UndeclaredThrowableException and check the nested type since the RMIAdaptor interface does not allow for