Shame on me and incremental recompilation through Eclipse!
Sorry,
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Scott
M Stark
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2004 21:43
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] Cvs head build error
I
On Feb 1, 2004, at 6:58 AM, Scott M Stark wrote:
I have not tried this, but others said they have done it.
Then I certainly must be doing something wrong
Where are you putting the jar
In the jboss-net.sar along with other Web Service Security support
libraries.
and how is the BouncyCastle
Hi,
I've checked in a new baseclass org.jboss.system.ListenerServiceMBeanSupport
( ListenerServiceMBean) that helps writing Service MBeans that are
Notification listeners, too:
/**
* An abstract base class that provides for declarative JMX notification
* subscription handling.
* p
* A JBoss
Ok, the dev list is now going into you must be subscribed to post mode.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
System Attendant
Sent:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #889337, was opened at 2004-02-02 22:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rchristy63
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889337group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #884090, was opened at 2004-01-25 13:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=884090group_id=22866
Category: Nukes
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #885357, was opened at 2004-01-27 11:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=885357group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #889337, was opened at 2004-02-02 22:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889337group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #889390, was opened at 2004-02-02 15:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889390group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #889078, was opened at 2004-02-02 14:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mlange99
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889078group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
You need to be careful with the http session. It can be used on
multiple threads unlike an ejb stateful session bean.
Regards,
Adrian
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:50, Bill Burke wrote:
I'd like for somebody to look into being able to define transaction
demarcation like we can for EJB at the
Bugs item #878879, was opened at 2004-01-17 17:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vprise
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=878879group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Bugs item #889312, was opened at 2004-02-02 15:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889312group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #878879, was opened at 2004-01-17 17:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=878879group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Bugs item #878879, was opened at 2004-01-17 17:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=878879group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority:
Hi Scott,
Our deployments generally boil down to a classpath
and a set of mbeans.
There is also a contract to define a directed graph
across deployments which orders the mbean lifecycle
invocations using depends
There are also implicit rules like:
1) deployments wait for their deployer
2)
First the 3.2 build was incorrect.
Second it wasn't testing against the jmxri 1.2
There were three known compliance issues (none are very important they
are on the edge of the spec or relate to UCL semantics versus the
spec's loader repository semantics).
The new failure looks to be caused by
Feature Requests item #889014, was opened at 2004-02-02 13:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=889014group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Bugs item #889078, was opened at 2004-02-02 14:35
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mlange99
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889078group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #889078, was opened at 2004-02-02 14:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889078group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #889117, was opened at 2004-02-02 15:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889117group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Renamed and reposted to jboss-dev
Marc Fleury wrote:
On a separate note. I have been thinking for the past week about this
stuff and microcontainer stuff in general. I think it is basically a
clean up of EJB stuff. Been thinking about entities and a way to
cleanly wrap up hibernate stuff.
Bugs item #889263, was opened at 2004-02-02 21:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889263group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Feature Requests item #889011, was opened at 2004-02-02 13:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=889011group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Yes, and its fixed in 3.2. I'm still in the process of merging the
fixes back to head.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rupp, Heiko
Bugs item #885357, was opened at 2004-01-27 11:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=885357group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Bugs item #885357, was opened at 2004-01-27 09:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by waggj
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=885357group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
It can't be done with the existing 1.0 and 1.1 dtds, it can be done for
the 1.2 xsd.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rupp, Heiko
Bugs item #798840, was opened at 2003-09-01 23:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ingrilli
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=798840group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Patches item #885815, was opened at 2004-01-27 13:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=885815group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #878527, was opened at 2004-01-16 22:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cooperfbi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=878527group_id=22866
Category: Nukes
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Bugs item #878879, was opened at 2004-01-17 17:41
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=878879group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #884420, was opened at 2004-01-26 00:20
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=884420group_id=22866
Category: Nukes
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #885053, was opened at 2004-01-26 13:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=885053group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Bugs item #886544, was opened at 2004-01-28 16:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=886544group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #886798, was opened at 2004-01-29 09:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=886798group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #870942, was opened at 2004-01-05 06:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=870942group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Bugs item #877172, was opened at 2004-01-14 13:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcalabrese
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=877172group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
The 3.2 branch is down to the same failures as head. The issue with the
two class loader failures is due to the fact that we don't like anything
but UCLs in the ULR and the MLet is transferred into an equivalent UCL
on
addition, but we lose the mapping between the UCL and MLet and when the
MLet is
Bugs item #886544, was opened at 2004-01-28 13:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=886544group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Bugs item #886544, was opened at 2004-01-28 16:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jhaynie
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=886544group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Bugs item #886791, was opened at 2004-01-29 09:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=886791group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #887491, was opened at 2004-01-30 10:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=887491group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #887648, was opened at 2004-01-30 09:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=887648group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #870942, was opened at 2004-01-05 06:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhandwerker
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=870942group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Bugs item #877172, was opened at 2004-01-14 13:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcalabrese
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=877172group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #780746, was opened at 2003-07-31 05:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmchan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=780746group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #885357, was opened at 2004-01-27 11:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=885357group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #887654, was opened at 2004-01-30 09:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=887654group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 30-January-2004
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1651
Successful tests: 1630
Errors:10
Failures: 11
Bugs item #887832, was opened at 2004-01-30 21:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=887832group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
email test
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
email test again
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
email test again
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
Bugs item #887832, was opened at 2004-01-30 22:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=887832group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #889390, was opened at 2004-02-03 01:36
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889390group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #889337, was opened at 2004-02-03 00:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889337group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
test from the website
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3819985#3819985
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3819985
message from Test forum
---
The SF.Net email is
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3819986#3819986
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3819986
test post from the Nukes development forum
---
The
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3819987#3819987
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3819987
I'm seeing unexpected behavior when accessing a secured JBoss.net web service. The
web service is
classpath and manifest refs only affect the classpath associated with a
deployment though, and generally this is incomplete because users rely
on the flat type model to not have to explicitly reference every source
of class they use. If the class loader associated with a deployed
tracked
what
64 matches
Mail list logo