[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618025406
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: -122Date of build:06/18/2004 02:54:06Time to build:18 minutes 39 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 02:34:06Last log entry:skeleton impl




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(4)1.2modifiedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2Policy.javaskeleton impl1.1addedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2IORInterceptor.javaskeleton impl1.1addedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2Initializer.javaskeleton impl1.1addedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2Util.javaskeleton impl



[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.93 Build Successful

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040618035322Lbuild.93
BUILD COMPLETE-build.93Date of build:06/18/2004 03:53:22Time to build:15 minutes 2 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 03:33:22Last log entry:Rename BeanUnitTestCaseNew to BeanUnitTestCase




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(3)1.3.4.2modifiedstarksmtestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/testbeancluster/test/BeanUnitTestCase.javaRename BeanUnitTestCaseNew to BeanUnitTestCase1.3.4.1deletedstarksmtestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/testbeancluster/test/BeanUnitTestCase.javaRemove the invalid BeanUnitTestCase cluster test1.1.4.2deletedstarksmtestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/testbeancluster/test/BeanUnitTestCaseNew.javaRemove the invalid BeanUnitTestCase cluster test



[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-975215 ] flushCache issue

2004-06-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #975215, was opened at 2004-06-18 11:48
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=975215group_id=22866

Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky)
Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky)
Summary: flushCache issue

Initial Comment:
First of all, flushCache() will actually flush the cache.
It will try to passivate the cached instances. Those
instances that are in use (enlisted in transactions)
won't be passivated but still will be evicted from the
cache. Nevertheless, the instances remain associated
with the transaction and are scheduled for
synchronization at commit, i.e. they will be updated in
the database with changes made in the tx.
What is dangerous and might be a bug is that if you
find the flushed instance with the finder in the same
tx, this found instance will be put into the cache
(with the data from the db, i.e. stale data) and
associated with the tx. So, there will be two
(different) versions of the same instance and both will
be synchronized at transaction commit. Last commit wins.

You can see it with the following code:

  ALocal a =
AUtil.getLocalHome().findByPrimaryKey(new APK(new
Long(1), avoka));
  a.setName2(NAME2);

  MBeanServer server =
MBeanServerLocator.locateJBoss();
  ObjectName container = new
ObjectName(jboss.j2ee:service=EJB,jndiName=A);
  server.invoke(container, flushCache, null, null);

  a = AUtil.getLocalHome().findByPrimaryKey(new
APK(new Long(1), avoka));
  log.info(a.name2:  + a.getName2());
  a.setName2(NAME3);

http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839187#3839187

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=975215group_id=22866


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.207 Build Fixed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618053541Lbuild.207
BUILD COMPLETE-build.207Date of build:06/18/2004 05:35:41Time to build:12 minutes 49 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 05:11:03Last log entry:corrected type orb.jboss - org.jboss




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(7)1.16modifiedanddiiop/src/etc/iiop-service.xmlcorrected type orb.jboss - org.jboss1.11modifiedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/IORFactory.javaenabled CSIv2Policy for home and remote1.15modifiedanddiiop/src/etc/iiop-service.xmladded CSIv2Initializer1.2modifiedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2Policy.javaskeleton impl1.1addedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2IORInterceptor.javaskeleton impl1.1addedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2Initializer.javaskeleton impl1.1addedanddiiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/csiv2/CSIv2Util.javaskeleton impl



[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Wrong search in GroupModule

2004-06-18 Thread LCB
The Search funktion in the GroupModule always returns only exact matches of the 
searchstring, ignoring the selected search method(Excat, Beginns with, Contains).

After looking in the code if found out that the search method sets the  wildcards only 
on default value. I think it should be inverse, add the wildcards when a string ist 
given.

Here the patch:
Index: GroupModule.java
  | ===
  | RCS file: 
/cvsroot/jboss/nukes/nukes/src/main/org/jboss/nukes/core/modules/group/GroupModule.java,v
  | retrieving revision 1.10
  | diff -u -r1.10 GroupModule.java
  | --- GroupModule.java3 Mar 2004 12:04:43 -   1.10
  | +++ GroupModule.java18 Jun 2004 10:23:32 -
  | @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@
  |   Integer id = page.getParameterAsInteger(id);
  |   String search = page.getParameter(search, %);
  |   int type = page.getParameterAsInt(type, 0);
  | - if (%.equals(search))
  | + if (!(%.equals(search)))
  |   {
  |  switch (type)
  |  {
  | 
  | 

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839201#3839201

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839201


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re:

2004-06-18 Thread solo
I too have the similar problem. It won't even accept non argument methods aas well.

Regards,
 Mario

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839212#3839212

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839212


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Problem of anchor in module

2004-06-18 Thread pista
Nobody can help me??
How to use anchor in a module ??
It's very important for me !! Please !!

Thanks in advanced

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839213#3839213

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839213


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.208 Build Successful

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618083233Lbuild.208
BUILD COMPLETE-build.208Date of build:06/18/2004 08:32:33Time to build:14 minutes 10 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 07:54:10Last log entry:auth-method can be "none" besides "username_password"




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(1)1.3modifiedanddserver/src/main/org/jboss/metadata/IorSecurityConfigMetaData.javaauth-method can be "none" besides "username_password"



[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Problem of anchor in module

2004-06-18 Thread LCB
Have you tried to call the anchor with an url like this:


  | a href=index.html?module=myModuleop=main#myAnchor 
  | 
for anchor

  | a name=myAnchor /
  | 

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839215#3839215

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839215


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [EJB on JBoss] - Which method will be invoked on Container?

2004-06-18 Thread liu_linux
I am interested in JDBCCMRFieldBridge in Jboss3.2.3. We create an instance of 
CMRInvocation in line 943 and use it to invoke the container in line 952. But I am 
puzzled in latter invocations. Which method will be invoked on EntityContainer on 
earth after the request goes through the interceptor chain?
Thank you!

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839222#3839222

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839222


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - Re: TODO: Admin objects

2004-06-18 Thread spiritualmechanic
Would a AdminObjectObjectModelFactory suffice or does it need to be abstracted out so 
that both *-ds.xml and jboss.xml could do it?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839239#3839239

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839239


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.209 Build Successful

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618102947Lbuild.209
BUILD COMPLETE-build.209Date of build:06/18/2004 10:29:47Time to build:13 minutes 42 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 10:09:47Last log entry:optimised invocation of private/protected constructors using inner invocation classes




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(4)1.6modifiedkabkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/instrument/ConstructorExecutionTransformer.javaoptimised invocation of private/protected constructors using inner invocation classes1.2modifiedkabkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/test/aop/basic/ReflectionPOJO.javaoptimised invocation of private/protected methods using inner invocation classes1.2modifiedkabkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/reflection/ReflectionAspect.javaoptimised invocation of private/protected methods using inner invocation classes1.10modifiedkabkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/instrument/MethodExecutionTransformer.javaoptimised invocation of private/protected methods using inner invocation classes



[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-974735 ] Slow performance of JaasSecurityManager

2004-06-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #974735, was opened at 2004-06-17 16:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by iprigg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=974735group_id=22866

Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: iprigg (iprigg)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Slow performance of JaasSecurityManager

Initial Comment:
I am operating Jboss 3.2.3 on an Athlon XP 1400+ 
machine with 512 MB of RAM running Windows 2000 
server. I am using JDK 1.4.1.I would like to report a bug 
in the jbossSX framework. In fact I don't know if it is 
actually a bug or just an implementation approach, that 
restricts the performance of the framework. I think it is 
the second, but I would like to know, whether it has 
been noticed and If there are plans for changing it.So 
lets continue with the description of the problem:
What I have tried lately to do was to perform some 
benchmark testing of a service access control data 
model I have created. In order to do that I decided to 
use the jbossSX framework for performing access control 
on 200 stateless EJBs. The security data was stored in 
an LDAP server, so I have created 3 login modules that 
perform specific searches in it, retrieving roles and 
assigning them to users. All Login modules were specified 
as required.The benchmark involved thousand of 
invocations of these EJBs (they all belong in the same 
security domain), within a few minutes, through a 
stateless client EJB, using 
the org.jboss.security.ClientLoginModule in order to 
pass the security credentials (username and password) 
to the server. The ldap server contains the credentials 
of 1000 users. So in practice I had 1000 users randomly 
performing calls on the methods provided by 200 
stateless EJBs. Each EJB contained 5 methods, each 
secured with a different role. Generation of invocation 
requests was extremely fast (about 3000 requests in a 3 
minutes period).
What I noticed, straight from the begining was that the 
whole process was extremely slow. For example 3000 
invocations of the secured EJBs (notice that the 
business logic included in the EJB is minimal, just printing 
a string), consumes the following time:
1) if JAAS cache is disabled 50 minutes
2) if JAAS cache is enabled 15 minutes (notice however 
that we have at maximum 1000 security checks the 
same with the total number of users)
Finally I have performed the same invocations without 
specifying a security domain for the EJBs and the testing 
was completed almost with the post of the final request 
(3 minutes).At first I suspected that the delay was due 
to the searches and the actual processing that takes 
place inside the Login Modules. However by measuring 
the actual time of each operation, I found out that less 
than 1% percent of the total execution time is spent 
there.After several tests, I found out that the actual 
problem was imposed by 
the JAASSecurityManager.class and speciffically its 
boolean method isValid(Principal principal, Object 
credential, Subject activeSubject), which is defined as 
synchronized. This results to all execution threads 
freezing upon accessing the method and ceasing their 
execution for very large periods of time. The more the 
threads accessing the class the more the experienced 
delay.
Is that something that would be taken care in the 
future? or it just needs to be done on this way, so no 
possible solution is foreseen?

--

Comment By: iprigg (iprigg)
Date: 2004-06-18 19:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1065443

Indeed, I have tested the case you mention, removing the 
synchronized keyword. Of course, as you mention the 
functionality is not correct as, different threads are accessing 
different security contexts, resulting to a hell of exceptions.
Here is my report:
1) Time for serving all requests is not significantly improved: a 
few minutes only, though this may be due to the random way 
requests are generated.  

2) However, what has been significantly improved is the 
serving time as experienced by the service itself (service 
time=the period from the time the invocation of the EJB is 
performed until the result is returned)
To be more specific when the synchronized keyword is 
present, and while requests are kept coming to the jboss 
system, each new request waits on the JaasSecurityManager, 
for a continuously increasing period. This wait is so long that 
after a certain period of high load (about 10 minutes), existing 
transactions start to rollback, (there is a default transaction 
timeout period of 300 secs, configurable from the transaction 
Manager service). So I had to increase the timeout period to 
3000 secs in order for my application to run properly. The 
measurements I took indicate that each request takes about 
250 secs (mean service time) in order to be 
completed.Corresponding max time is above 

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.210 Build Successful

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618115330Lbuild.210
BUILD COMPLETE-build.210Date of build:06/18/2004 11:53:30Time to build:17 minutes 30 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 11:33:30Last log entry:Support optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(28)1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/deployment/MetaDataRegistry.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.14modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/deployment/ServiceDescription.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.13modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/deployment/WSDDGenerator.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.4modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/client/ServiceFactoryImpl.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.11modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/client/ServiceImpl.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.17modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/client/ServiceObjectFactory.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.27modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/AxisService.javaSupport optional type mapping meta data from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.6modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/EngineConfigurationFinder.javaAdd public statics for the default configurations1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/PortComponent.javaAdd a port component MBean1.4modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/PortComponentInfo.javaAdd a port component MBean1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/Base64BinaryArrayDeserializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/Base64BinaryArrayDeserializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/Base64BinaryArraySerializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/Base64BinaryArraySerializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/HexBinaryArrayDeserializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/HexBinaryArrayDeserializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/HexBinaryArraySerializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/HexBinaryArraySerializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/MeataDataBeanSerializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/MetaDataBeanDeserializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/MetaDataBeanDeserializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/MetaDataBeanSerializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/MetaDataTypeDesc.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/SOAPArrayDeserializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/SOAPArrayDeserializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/SOAPArraySerializer.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.1addedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/encoding/ser/SOAPArraySerializerFactory.javaAdd serializers used by the interop tests1.26modifiedtdieslerwebservice/build.xmlinclude encoding classes in client jar



[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618124621
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: -122Date of build:06/18/2004 12:46:21Time to build:20 minutes 24 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 12:00:17Last log entry:Better javadoc.lookup fix for ws4ee-deployment.xml when client is a servlet




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(2)1.18modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/client/ServiceObjectFactory.javaBetter javadoc.lookup fix for ws4ee-deployment.xml when client is a servlet1.28modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/AxisService.javaBetter javadoc.lookup fix for ws4ee-deployment.xml when client is a servlet



[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - remote JBoss deployment

2004-06-18 Thread vpatryshev
Hi,

I needed to deploy my ears to JBoss using a command-line tool; could not find any, and 
had to write my own: http://www.myjavatools.com/projects/systemJsp/readme.html

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839267#3839267

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839267


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-975500 ] IllegalArgumentException in WrappedResultSet

2004-06-18 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #975500, was opened at 2004-06-18 17:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=975500group_id=22866

Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Copeland (bobc)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: IllegalArgumentException in WrappedResultSet

Initial Comment:
In JBoss 3.2.4 WrappedResult.getResultSet should return
null instead of trying to create a WrappedResultSet and
throwing an IllegalArgumentException when the rs is
null.  It is legal to call stmt.getResultSet() when an
update count is returned and the result set would be
null (obviously the caller who does this checks the
return value).  Here's a snippet:

   String someSql = update foo set bar=?;
   Statement stmt = conn.prepareStatement(someSql);
   // ... set parameters 
   stmt.execute(); 

   // sometimes someSql is a query; if so do something.
   if ((rs = statement.getResultSet()) != null) 
   { 
   /* do something */ 
   }

produces a stack trace like:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Null result set!
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedResultSet.init(WrappedResultSet.java:64)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedStatement.registerResultSet(WrappedStatement.java:834)
at
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedStatement.getResultSet(WrappedStatement.java:537)
at  our code here

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=975500group_id=22866


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - JBossCache with LRU benchmark

2004-06-18 Thread idumali
OK,

here are the final results.

We did series of tests on the following wakeUpIntervalSeconds: 1,3,5,10,15. The 
default one indicated in the sample code on your site was 5sec. In each series, 
several series of puts() were performed: from 500 to 50,000 with step 1,000 (10 points 
for each series of wakeUpInterval).

Following is the source that performs the whole cycle:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/JBossLRUTest.java
And sample configuration for 5 seconds:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/treecache-5.xml

You can, also, download the complete package with all the config files,   JARs, Ant 
build script and run.bat from here:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/LRUTest.zip

The memory settings used in the test were the same as in run.bat:
-Xms 512M -Xmx 800M

The machine used was single-processor Intel Pentium 4 2.6GHz with Hyperthreading 
enabled.

Now the results. 

Following is all the series together:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/images/benchmark-all.gif

As you can see not only time of put() is proportional of the number of objects 
(inneficient algorithm) but the coefficient of linear dependence increases drastically 
with the increase of wakeUpInterval. If you want to get a feeling of the speed you 
can, also, see the proportionally scaled graph of the same results:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/images/benchmark-all-propscale.gif

As you can see - at 15 secs it is almost vertical!

Please, also note the brown line representing the same test with LRU turned off - it 
is almost horizontal. Without LRU the cache performance, per se, is not bad - that if 
you can imagine a cache running without LRU in production, when JVM has hard limit of 
~2GB on available memory :)

Following is just the LRU-turned-off test:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/images/benchmark-lruOff.gif

Then we did profiling to get some feeling of what is going wrong. 

Following are overall and zoomed-in snapshots:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/images/profiling.gif
Diving into one of the slow branches:
http://www.powerdot.org/jbosscache-benchmark/images/profiling-detail.gif

These are just first-glance conclusions so may not be 100% the reson but this is what 
we think is wrong:

1. org.jboss.cache.Fqn class uses non-static logger, which means that its instance is 
created every time someone calls new Fqn() or clone().

2. The toString() method in org.jboss.cache.Fqn is VERY slow (no surprise there: 
StringBuffer and other slow stuff is used). Odd, for us, is that 
org.jboss.cache.eviction.LRUPolicy uses code like Region region = 
regionManager_.getRegion(fqn.toString()); while Fqn can be used as a key in 
java.util.Map (?)

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839276#3839276

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839276


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-18 Thread bwang00
Hi,

Thank you very much for all efforts. This is valuable information for me to 
troubleshoot. Just one quick question. What is the log level for org.jboss.cache? 
DEBUG or INFO? Default shipped with the package is DEBUG and that may have 
signicant impact on the overall performance.

Cheers,

-Ben


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839281#3839281

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839281


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-18 Thread mikheil
Hi Ben,

In the tests above the log level was INFO. You can find the log4j.properties in the 
zip file that irakli has posted, under src directory.

Mikheil

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839284#3839284

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839284


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.211 Build Fixed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618164509Lbuild.211
BUILD COMPLETE-build.211Date of build:06/18/2004 16:45:09Time to build:18 minutes 44 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 15:40:59Last log entry:fixed remove(): do not remove root dir




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(4)1.6modifiedbelabancache/src/main/org/jboss/cache/loader/FileCacheLoader.javafixed remove(): do not remove root dir1.11modifiedbelabancache/src/main/org/jboss/cache/Fqn.javamade Logger static1.18modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/client/ServiceObjectFactory.javaBetter javadoc.lookup fix for ws4ee-deployment.xml when client is a servlet1.28modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/AxisService.javaBetter javadoc.lookup fix for ws4ee-deployment.xml when client is a servlet



[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Is anyone using TreeCache in production?

2004-06-18 Thread bwang00
Mikheil,

Thanks for the info. I will take a look.

-Ben

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839288#3839288

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839288


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - How to configure a JBoss-Server with JBoss IDE

2004-06-18 Thread cschlaefcke
I just downloaded and installed eclpise 3.0RC2 on my fedora box. This is running like 
charm! Now I want to connect to my also fresh downloaded jboss (3.2.24 and 4.0.0DR4). 
I followed the steps on http://www.devx.com/opensource/Article/20242/0/page/1 to get 
the jboss ide plugin installed. This finished without any errors. Now I can see the 
JBoss IDE tab in the settings. I cannot find any information on how to configure the 
jboss servers correctly. The tab Default Server is empty so I cannot select any of 
the installed servers.

What am I missing?

Thanks  Regards,

Chris

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839293#3839293

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839293


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618194116
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: -122Date of build:06/18/2004 19:41:16Time to build:12 minutes 59 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 19:21:16Last log entry:fix operation parameter mapping from ws4ee-deployment.xml




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(5)1.15modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/deployment/ServiceDescription.javafix operation parameter mapping from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.6modifiedstarksmwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerEJB.javaUndo the last checkin mistake1.10modifiedstarksmiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/EjbObjectCorbaServant.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential1.10modifiedstarksmiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/EjbHomeCorbaServant.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential1.5modifiedstarksmwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerEJB.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential



[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 90 % ( 1795 / 1980 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
Sat Jun 19 01:58:31 GMTDT 2004
===
HERE ARE THE LAST 100 LINES OF THE LOG:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===


JBoss daily test results

SUMMARY

Number of tests run:   1980



Successful tests:  1795

Errors:173

Failures:  12





[time of test: 2004-06-18.23-39 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.1_06]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.4.1_06-b01]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Windows XP]
[os.arch: x86]
[os.version: 5.1]

Useful resources:

- 
http://jboss.kimptoc.net/winxp/1.4.1_06/logtests/testresults/reports/html//2004-06-18.23-39
 for
the junit report of this test.


NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting 
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.

It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that 
break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate!





DETAILS OF ERRORS



Suite:   org.jboss.test.cache.test.replicated.SyncTxUnitTestCase
Test:unknown
Type:error
Exception:   junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message: Timeout occurred
-



Suite:   org.jboss.test.client.test.AppClientUnitTestCase
Test:testENC
Type:error
Exception:   javax.naming.NameNotFoundException
Message: test-client not bound
-



Suite:   org.jboss.test.client.test.AppClientUnitTestCase
Test:testEjbs
Type:error
Exception:   javax.naming.NameNotFoundException
Message: test-client not bound
-



Suite:   org.jboss.test.client.test.AppClientUnitTestCase
Test:testServerFound
Type:error
Exception:   org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException
Message: Failed to find module file: cts.jar
-



Suite:   org.jboss.test.ha.singleton.test.HASingletonSupportUnitTestCase
Test:testBecomeMasterNode
Type:failure
Exception:   junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message: expected to become master
-



Suite:   org.jboss.test.ha.singleton.test.HASingletonSupportUnitTestCase
Test:testStopOnlyNode
Type:failure
Exception:   junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message: expected to become master

===
Sat Jun 19 01:58:31 GMTDT 2004
===
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 quarks2 1.5.4(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-12 23:08 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin
===
java -version
java version 1.4.1_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_06-b01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_06-b01, mixed mode)


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618213558
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: -122Date of build:06/18/2004 21:35:58Time to build:10 minutes 29 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 21:05:21Last log entry:fixed web.xml generation, the stream was not closed after the file generation, causing random error when then it reloaded by tomcat during redeploy (premature end of file during while xerces tries to load it)




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(6)1.10modifiedvietjwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerJSE.javafixed web.xml generation, the stream was not closed after the file generation, causing random error when then it reloaded by tomcat during redeploy (premature end of file during while xerces tries to load it)1.15modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/deployment/ServiceDescription.javafix operation parameter mapping from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.6modifiedstarksmwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerEJB.javaUndo the last checkin mistake1.10modifiedstarksmiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/EjbObjectCorbaServant.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential1.10modifiedstarksmiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/EjbHomeCorbaServant.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential1.5modifiedstarksmwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerEJB.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential



[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
Sat Jun 19 03:24:20 GMTDT 2004
===
HERE ARE THE LAST 100 LINES OF THE LOG:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cache.stress.EvictionLocalStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 83.61 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cache.stress.LocalStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 52.062 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cache.stress.ReadWriteLockWithUpgradeStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.563 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cmp2.cmrstress.CMRStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.047 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.cts.test.StatelessSessionStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 11.469 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.deadlock.test.BeanStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 19.25 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.hello.test.HelloClusteredHttpStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 10, Time elapsed: 3.141 sec
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.hello.test.HelloClusteredHttpStressTestCase FAILED
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.hello.test.HelloHttpStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 5, Time elapsed: 6.187 sec
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.hello.test.HelloHttpStressTestCase FAILED
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.hello.test.HelloTimingStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.703 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.JBossMQPerfStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 57.719 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.OIL2InvocationLayerStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.407 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.OILInvocationLayerStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.156 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.RMIInvocationLayerStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.656 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.SendReplyPerfStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.969 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.UIL2InvocationLayerStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.422 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.BaseConnectionManagerStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.406 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.jca.test.CachedConnectionBankStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.437 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.lock.test.EnterpriseEntityStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 17.734 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.naming.test.NamingStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 2.765 sec
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.naming.test.NamingStressTestCase FAILED
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.perf.test.PerfStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 16.469 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.pooled.test.BeanStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 10.328 sec

tests-iiop-stress:
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.bankiiop.test.BankStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 85.813 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.excepiiop.test.ExceptionTimingStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.922 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.helloiiop.test.HelloTimingStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.406 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.hellojrmpiiop.test.HelloTimingStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13.766 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.iiop.test.ParameterPassingStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 20.406 sec
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.txiiop.test.IIOPUserTransactionStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 3, 

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: % ( / ) - . JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
Sat Jun 19 03:39:08 GMTDT 2004
===
HERE ARE THE LAST 100 LINES OF THE LOG:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===

===
Sat Jun 19 03:39:08 GMTDT 2004
===
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 quarks2 1.5.4(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-12 23:08 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin
===
java -version
java version 1.4.2_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode)


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.212 Build Fixed

2004-06-18 Thread kimptoc_mail

View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040618231047Lbuild.212
BUILD COMPLETE-build.212Date of build:06/18/2004 23:10:47Time to build:12 minutes 59 secondsLast changed:06/18/2004 22:42:28Last log entry:fixed incorrect creation of TreeCache




   Unit Tests: (0)No Tests RunThis project doesn't have any tests
Modifications since last build:(16)1.8modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/replicated/AsyncUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.11modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/replicated/SyncTxUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.4modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/stress/EvictionLocalStressTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.7modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/stress/LocalStressTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.8modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/local/ConcurrentUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.5modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/local/NoTxUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.2modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/local/TxConcurrentBankUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.8modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/local/TxConcurrentUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.6modifiedbelabantestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/local/TxUnitTestCase.javafixed incorrect creation of TreeCache1.9modifiedstarksmserver/src/resources/dtd/jboss_4_0.dtdAdd port-component element which specifies a mapping from a webserviceport-component whose service-impl-bean/ejb-link value maps to an ejb.!ELEMENT port-component (port-component-name, port-uri?, auth-method?, transport-guarantee?) 1.10modifiedvietjwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerJSE.javafixed web.xml generation, the stream was not closed after the file generation, causing random error when then it reloaded by tomcat during redeploy (premature end of file during while xerces tries to load it)1.15modifiedtdieslerwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/deployment/ServiceDescription.javafix operation parameter mapping from ws4ee-deployment.xml1.6modifiedstarksmwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerEJB.javaUndo the last checkin mistake1.10modifiedstarksmiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/EjbObjectCorbaServant.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential1.10modifiedstarksmiiop/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/ejb/EjbHomeCorbaServant.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential1.5modifiedstarksmwebservice/src/main/org/jboss/webservice/ServiceDeployerEJB.javaAdd the code to extract the SASCurrent and populate the invocation with theprincipal and credential