iwadasn, you are no fun.
The script you gave us is outdated as any script that would be manually
generated (the database schema changed).
That's why it has to be automatically generated.
If you are using the sources, you can build the ddl file for ANY database just
by typing sh build.sh ddl
Hi,
I have a little problem, probably easy to solve:
If I have a method
public boolean mymethod(),
that is intercepted by an aspect/interceptor myAspect. Is it possible to find
out, after the interceptor has called this method-invocation by
InvocationResponse ir = (InvocationResponse)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-6?page=comments#action_12316215
]
Heiko W. Rupp commented on JBMAIL-6:
I have started with something like this already.
I'm not sure when I can go on, as I am still working on
Certainly change the 'bean' attribute in the bean element to 'class' :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870513#3870513
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3870513
Hi
Is the development in a state where jms api client can be written.i thought of
start contribution by writing jms 1.1 compliance tests.
saw a JMSClient in org.jboss.messaging.jms.tools, but not sure where is it
going to pick up the initial context properties from(there is p2p.properties
in
Hi, I Deployed the jboss-profiler-noAOP.sar in JBoss and included
-XrunjbossInspector:f:/arihant,include=com.test,ignore=*,start=com.test
In the MBean view I clicked on start , and it gave the following exception
13:10:59,128 WARN [ServiceController] Problem starting service
Hi, I Deployed the jboss-profiler-noAOP.sar in JBoss and included
-XrunjbossInspector:f:/arihant,include=com.test,ignore=*,start=com.test
In the MBean view I clicked on start , and it gave the following exception
13:10:59,128 WARN [ServiceController] Problem starting service
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1591?page=comments#action_12316216 ]
Richard C. L. Li commented on JBAS-1591:
I think the exceptions thrown by the security interceptors should be wrapped by
a specialized RuntimeException, then the log
i was able to run a simple jms api test client with this
Properties props = new Properties();
|
props.put(java.naming.factory.initial,org.jboss.messaging.util.StandaloneInitialContextFactory);
| ctx = new InitialContext(props);
please let me know if my writing test
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050317081044Lbuild.888
BUILD COMPLETE-build.888Date of build:03/17/2005 08:10:44Time to build:14 minutes 55 secondsLast changed:03/17/2005 06:54:51Last log entry:added element type binding
I can code:
System.out.println(This is a Message);
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870544#3870544
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3870544
Not strictly a DTD issue but would be nice to able to import classes rather
than be forced to use FQN all over the place... that would help a ton.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870547#3870547
Reply to the post :
Ok, it seems like I am going to disappoint you.
Being a Junior Scientist, I have been doing a lot of research trying to come up
with the best unmarshalling metadata/handling model based on your XML snippets
and requirements for customizing bindings from different sources including
inheritance
TypeBinding was not added to this version of API.
I described current API mess in Reusing xml element definitions/bindings
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870549#3870549
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870552#3870552
anonymous wrote : I have some inklings to use AOP for security
This is good news. I would like to use AOP for transaction management as the
JBoss apects give the same coverage as EJBs.
Mike.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870556#3870556
Another bastardization of XML but since this was never designed for humans to
write anyway
As scott says, allow ANY types for things like properties and read in the
element name as the property's name directly, so
| property name=bindAddress127.0.0.1/property
| property
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-6?page=comments#action_12316217
]
Andrew Oliver commented on JBMAIL-6:
Well its on the docket for M3 which I presently have the final targeted for mid
april. S if you commit it in at least
Yeah but doesn't using AOP for pluggable security in the mail server feel a bit
naughty?
Now the naughties thing is that I have thoughts on how to implement almost
exactly what we need so far as security goes with a combination of AOP and
hibernate 3 filters... However I feel a bit like I'm
Yeah that actually makes sense. I presently have to do ssh tunneling in most
hotels.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870562#3870562
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3870562
InvocationResponse is only used by distributed object protocols.
invocation.invokeNext() returns the autoboxed form of the return type.
so, if the method is:
public boolean mymethod()
You could typecast invocation.invokeNext();
Object obj = invocation.invokeNext();
Boolean b = (Boolean)obj;
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-9?page=history ]
Andrew Oliver updated JBMAIL-9:
---
Fix Version: 1.0-M3
Amend build to (optionally) automatically create database tables using hbm2ddl
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-8?page=history ]
Andrew Oliver updated JBMAIL-8:
---
Fix Version: 1.0-M3
Hibernate Mailboxes
---
Key: JBMAIL-8
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-8
Project:
I've used this pattern in AOP to model user metadata...
Only thing is that the metadata becomes invalidatable... Not so important with
simple case, but list, map, etc... can be validated. Also, Adrian whats
metadata for invoking on a constructor.
View the original post :
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1594?page=history ]
Jesper Pedersen updated JBAS-1594:
--
Attachment: altertable.patch
ALTER TABLE ADD DEFAULT
---
Key: JBAS-1594
URL:
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316221 ]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1391:
-
I was asked to look into this. Wouldn't it be easier to have a logical
DataSource that would maintain a list of target
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-25?page=history ]
Andrew Oliver updated JBMAIL-25:
Version: 1.0-M3
Fix Version: 1.0-M3
Modify StreamStore to be pluggable MessageStore
---
Key:
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-27?page=history ]
Andrew Oliver updated JBMAIL-27:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Version: 1.0-M3
Fix Version: 1.0-M3
Create build flag to exclude test war
-
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-9?page=history ]
Andrew Oliver resolved JBMAIL-9:
Resolution: Rejected
not needed per comments
Amend build to (optionally) automatically create database tables using hbm2ddl
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-36?page=comments#action_12316219 ]
Andrew Oliver commented on JBMAIL-36:
-
Yeah.
Support (optional) CRC or long hashkey generation for bodies
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050317095424Lbuild.440
BUILD COMPLETE-build.440Date of build:03/17/2005 09:54:24Time to build:41 minutes 46 secondsLast changed:03/17/2005 09:46:16Last log entry:removing castor dependency
Forum user id not bound correctly
-
Key: JBPORTAL-218
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-218
Project: JBoss Portal
Type: Bug
Components: Forums
Versions: 2.0 Beta 1
Reporter: Thomas Heute
Assigned to:
Hi,
I am working with TreeCache and TreeCacheAOP. I have both configured with the
FetchStateOnStartUp set to true. To test both I start one instance of
TreeCache and TreeCacheAOP. In my TreeCacheLogs I see that when I start a
second TreeCache it is updated from whatever is in the first
I am using maven. Doing maven java:compile results in the error message shown
below.
maven.xml snippet
| postGoal name=java:compile
| echoRunning AopC/echo
| attainGoal name=aopCompile/
| /postGoal
|
| goal name=aopCompile
| taskdef name=aopc
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-218?page=history ]
Thomas Heute resolved JBPORTAL-218:
---
Resolution: Done
Fixed and released in jboss-forums-2.0-beta1a
Forum user id not bound correctly
-
HTTP Protocol Proxy
---
Key: JBMAIL-42
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-42
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Feature Request
Components: POP, SMTP
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
Priority: Critical
Develop an
ALTER TABLE ADD DEFAULT
---
Key: JBAS-1594
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1594
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Patch
Components: CMP service
Versions: JBossAS-4.0.2RC1
Environment: SuSE with Sun JDK-1.4+
SMTP Proxy Servlet
--
Key: JBMAIL-44
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-44
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
Issue to track the SMTP part
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1594?page=history ]
Jesper Pedersen updated JBAS-1594:
--
Attachment: altertable-doc.patch
ALTER TABLE ADD DEFAULT
---
Key: JBAS-1594
URL:
well...actually, I can get the stack trace...but I dont know how to fix
itthe stack trace is
| BUILD FAILED
| Error running aopc compiler:
| at org.jboss.aop.ant.AopC.execute(AopC.java:278)
| at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:341)
| at
Thank you Bill,
I'll try it out!!!
OLLI
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870576#3870576
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3870576
---
SF email
Create support for Mozilla.org's Thunderbird to support SMTP over HTTP
--
Key: JBMAIL-48
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-48
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew
Add support to Mozilla's thunderbird for SMTP over HTTPS
Key: JBMAIL-49
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-49
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew
Add support to Mozilla's thunderbird for POP over HTTP
--
Key: JBMAIL-50
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-50
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050317104111Lbuild.889
BUILD COMPLETE-build.889Date of build:03/17/2005 10:41:11Time to build:20 minutes 56 secondsLast changed:03/17/2005 09:52:23Last log entry:first tested runtime
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=comments#action_12316222 ]
Bruno Melloni commented on JBAS-1551:
-
Isolation of logging is better in 4.0.2RC1, but not perfect. Using
EAR-specific log4j.jar, commons-logging.jar and
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=history ]
Bruno Melloni updated JBAS-1551:
Attachment: coA.ear
coLog4j.xml
TestServlet.java
Classloader bug (version 3.2.3)
-
I would second the opinion on portable XDoclet and Build files. I constantly
need to switch machines (Windows/Linux) and it's a real pain to manually
assemble the XDoclet/Build scripts.
Reiner
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870594#3870594
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=history ]
Bruno Melloni updated JBAS-1551:
Attachment: CoConfig.java
CoConfig.hbm.xml
Classloader bug (version 3.2.3)
-
Key: JBAS-1551
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316223 ]
Adrian Brock commented on JBAS-1391:
First, it is better to discuss the design in the dev forums.
To answer your question Alex, it can be done both ways.
The DataSource
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=history ]
Bruno Melloni updated JBAS-1551:
Attachment: CoConfigCreateSQL.txt
Classloader bug (version 3.2.3)
-
Key: JBAS-1551
URL:
check for existing RFCs
---
Key: JBMAIL-43
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-43
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
Priority: Minor
check for existing RFCs or
POP subtask
---
Key: JBMAIL-45
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-45
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
Task to track the POP proxy for http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-42
--
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316225 ]
Adrian Brock commented on JBAS-1391:
Sean's comment is entirely unrelated to the problem.
He is talking about *restarting* JBossMQ with a new DataSource/ConnectionURL
You are hitting the wrong MBean. You were looking at the MBean for the J2EE
application.
Try this one:
http://localhost:8080/jmx-console/HtmlAdaptor?action=inspectMBeanname=jboss.profiler%3Ambean%3DNative-profiler
In the JMX-console list you will see a different one:
jboss.profiler
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=comments#action_12316226 ]
Bruno Melloni commented on JBAS-1551:
-
Note: If you see 2 versions of files, the smaller one corresponds to the
minimal version of coA.ear (only log4j.jar, but no use of
POP Client Proxy
Key: JBMAIL-46
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-46
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
The POP client proxy mimic's a real POP Server however it translates the
SMTP Client Proxy
-
Key: JBMAIL-47
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-47
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
The SMTP client proxy mimic's a real SMTP Server however it translates
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=comments#action_12316227 ]
Bruno Melloni commented on JBAS-1551:
-
It might be relevant to the troubleshooting to mention that the JARs included
in the WAR are log4j, hibernate and supporting JARs,
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316228 ]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1391:
-
You are right, Adrian. I'll look at your first suggestion. Thanks.
Add support for datasource failover
Add support to Mozilla's thunderbird for POP over HTTPS
---
Key: JBMAIL-51
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-51
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log2005031734Lbuild.312
BUILD COMPLETE-build.312Date of build:03/17/2005 11:11:34Time to build:26 minutes 53 secondsLast changed:03/17/2005 09:36:31Last log entry:reduce debug-trace for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Does this support nested java beans, or is that the
Beans as values item? Also, what about custom object factories based on
namespaces? This is an example from head I'm working on for the legacy service
descritpor:
|
I answered this question before didn't I? In my
Moved last API testcases to thier own unit testcase
| package org.jboss.test.xml;
| public class SundayUnitTestCase
|
Also added first runtime binding testcase (testRtBook) with selective binding
customizations.
View the original post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Not strictly a DTD issue but would be nice to able
to import classes rather than be forced to use FQN all over the place... that
would help a ton.
|
I'll have to think about that one. It requires interaction with the classloader
which I definitly don't want to do in
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20050317114737Lbuild.93
BUILD COMPLETE-build.93Date of build:03/17/2005 11:47:37Time to build:33 minutes 1 second
Unit Tests: (0) Total
Look, it sounds like you really like JAMES and want to use JAMES, so go use
JAMES
Tsk Tsk Andy.
Just because someone says he likes some design features of a competing piece of
software is no reason to be so dismissive.
There are things I think I would like about using James, like its
The complexity possible in the nesting of bean properties is not evident from
the current testcases, and it did not jump out at me that the java
configuration of the jbossxb factory supports this. We should define a schema
for the xml deployer's supported document syntax. The question to Alexey
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316230 ]
Adrian Brock commented on JBAS-1391:
There is an even more important problem with the DataSource of DataSources
approach.
Any failover will bypass the transaction
Thank you for your involvement.
Yes, we are at the development stage when a JMS API client can be written, or
at least, we're very close to that. Please look at the JMS Facade thread
http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=61556, you'll see where we
are. However, that client
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Also, why not just borrow from the spring property
model:
|
I essentially have the same thing? Certainly the underlying metadata model
looks the same.
The differencies I see are:
1) I have not description
2) I have no special element for java.util.Properties
3) I
final update...I copied
| classpath id=aop.jboss.classpath
| pathelement path=${pom.getDependencyClasspath()}/
| pathelement location=${maven.build.dir}/classes/
| /classpath
|
under and it WORKED.
View the original post :
Bela,
Can we use it on JDK 1.5?
If it does't support 1.5, then when are planning to support it?
Thanks
Anu
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870619#3870619
Reply to the post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Also, Adrian whats metadata for invoking on a
constructor.
See the examples I posted from the tests.
There are four mechanisms:
1) Straight constructor invocation
2) Static factory
3) A factory instance constructed through IOC/Dependency injection
4) GenericBeanFactory
I'm curious about people's thoughts about the James Mailet API as a design for
e-mail processing after it's been accepted by the SMTP server. (The api is
described at http://james.apache.org/mailet_api_2_1.html)
Since I've already received Andy's views on this, I'd like to hear from others
I have a JBoss/Remoting server running - everthing is good.
I then have an object that makes a JMX call to the Network Registry - calling
getServers.
I'm getting back an empty array.
Does the registry only contain servers that are running on remote machines or
remote JVMs? Or is it supposed
anonymous wrote :
| You are asking for
| property/ANY - AbstractValueMetaData
| and delegates the element parsing to this schema - jbossxb/jaxb notion
|
This should NOT just be at the property level.
Since to support the use case
deployments we would need something like:
Thank you for the quick response Ben. That helps. My main concerns are in the
area of performance.
From what I read, if I use the cache loader, then every single node is
persisted on a backend store. Correct? Will that not be a big dent on
performance?
What if I dont have/want a cache
Fixed it myself by adding to
jboss-portal-2.0-beta1-bin/portal-core.sar/portal-cms.war/WEB-INF/web.xml
anonymous wrote :
| mime-mapping
| jsp
| mime-typetext/plain/mime-type
| /mime-mapping
|
However, the editor still parses out the tags.
View the original post :
Yes, your observation is correct. I have changed this in 1.2.2. In the
meantime, please patch your local code.
Thanks for this report !
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870641#3870641
Reply to the post :
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-24?page=history ]
Andrew Oliver updated JBMAIL-24:
Version: 1.0-M3
Mail that gets rejected with 5xx should be given back to user
-
Key:
I tried wrting jsp in Nukes and although the source was saved properly, it
wouldn't display the page.
Do the developers of the CMS have in mind to be able to(maybe in the near
future) manage and serve jsp files as well?
View the original post :
I am getting TimeoutExceptions from the TreeCache when I run my application
which is uses the TreeCacheAop MBean for synchronous replication. I have tried
doubling the original value for the LockAcquisitionTimeout attribute but this
appears to have no effect on the situation, and I can't see
anonymous wrote :
| I answered this question before didn't I? In my critique of this approach.
|
| I am constructing the metadata that will construct the bean when
dependencies
| are satisfied.
|
| If the javabean has no dependencies (e.g. simple config object)
| the object
Actually, I have switched txs and tx_map from HashMap to
ConcurrentReaderHashMap. This way, I don't need to synchronize at all. This
will be in 1.2.2.
Can you try this on your system and see whether you're still getting concurrent
mod exceptions ?
View the original post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
| Ok, so assign the associated task to me so I know its supported and I won't
have a reason to ask again.
|
I'll need to look at Alex's new Sunday implementation to complete this work,
since I need to have
property/CDATA - StringValueMetaData
property/dependency -
If you impelement a mailet api adapter which is non-invasive to the rest of the
server (suggest a maillistener), I'll commit it provided it has good unit tests
and you make it optional and maintain the build targets associated with it.
View the original post :
More on the ValueMetaData, I assume your wanting instead of:
anonymous wrote :
|
| property name=Bean1
| xmlns:ns1=urn:schema:ns1:jbossxb
| ...
|
| property name=Bean2
| xmlns:ns2=urn:schema:ns2:jbossxb
| ...
|
In case you were in any doubt, I HATE xml parsing :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870629#3870629
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3870629
anonymous wrote :
| You are asking for
| property/ANY - AbstractValueMetaData
| and delegates the element parsing to this schema - jbossxb/jaxb notion
|
Another issue that jumps out is how to reverse the process.
e.g. Given an MC metadata config how do we identify the marshalling
of
anonymous wrote :
| This change does have ramifications on the behavior of the jbossxb object
factories because the latter form is throwing away object relationships.
I don't understand what you are getting at?
The only reason to name a bean is if you want it in the registry
such that it can
I'd recommend reworking what is already in the testsuite
to work over both JBossMQ and JBoss Messaging:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/objectweb/jtests/
However, that is only jms1.0.2b level tests.
Some of the JBossMQ tests are also pretty generic where they
Can you create a JIRA bug report for this
(http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE) ?
This would be a pretty serious bug, and creating a JIRA report makes sure I
don't forget about it !
If you can assign it to version 1.2.2, otherwise I'll do it
View the original post :
NetworkRegistry will only contain servers from remote JVMs. I think I may have
documentation that suggests otherwise (and if so and you know where that is,
can you point it out for me?). It will only be populated if you have a
detector running locally as well.
If want just local servers,
What I'd really like it if you got involved in current initiatives before
starting your own so that you first actually become familar with what is here
and get used to working with the people HERE now. Otherwise you just become
kind of a growth and don't get incorporated into the people side
I don't believe our editor supports JSP tags or anything that isnt text/html or
text/plain.
I can look thru their forums once their site is up again and find out for sure.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870639#3870639
Reply to the post :
So I have some things that are in M3 that may get pushed to M4 (namely the JCA
stuff). I also have the IMAP initiative starting off during M4 (though what I
mean by that is limited).
Additionally, I've been entering follow up stuff and things that were in the
Wiki into JIRA. We should still
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1359?page=history ]
Dimitris Andreadis closed JBAS-1359:
Resolution: Done
snmp-adaptor now uses JBossXB (MappingObjectModelFactory
GenericObjectModelFactory). There are slight differences between the
I apologize if this question is simple, but I'm unclear on a few concepts.
I was wondering how the Portal CMS serves the files. Would it allow jsp code to
be interpreted by the server?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870647#3870647
Reply to the
ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable
---
Key: JBCACHE-113
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-113
Project: JBoss Cache
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.2.1
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned to:
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-113?page=history ]
Bela Ban resolved JBCACHE-113:
--
Resolution: Done
Fixed by switching HashMap to ConcurrentReaderHashMap
ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
