[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-06-28 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060629010629
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:249: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-common-targets.xml:26: Build Successful - Tests completed with errors or failures.Date of build: 06/29/2006 01:06:29Time to build: 50 minutes 31 secondsLast changed: 06/24/2006 20:59:15Last log entry: JBAS-3323: Use the tmp folder via the Java system property




    Unit Tests: (1861)    Total Errors and Failures: (2)testNoTransactionCommitCorg.jboss.test.entity.test.EJBLoadUnitTestCasetestNotificationWithBadListenerorg.jboss.test.jmx.test.SecureJMXInvokerUnitTestCase 
 Modifications since last build: (first 50 of 137)1.2.2.3modifiedasaldhanatestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/security/test/RoleMappingModuleUnitTestCase.javaJBAS-3323: Use the tmp folder via the Java system property1.2.2.2modifiedasaldhanatestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/security/test/RoleMappingModuleUnitTestCase.javaJBAS-3323: Role Mapping Login Module that allows mapping of roles from the application domain to the declarative domain for a security domain.1.2.2.1deletedasaldhanatestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/security/test/RoleMappingModuleUnitTestCase.javafile RoleMappingModuleUnitTestCase.java was added on branch Branch_3_2 on 2006-06-23 15:46:38 +1.2.8.2modifiedasaldhanavaria/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/html/JMXOpsAccessControlFilter.javaJBAS-3311: Provide access control to JMX ops in the JMX console1.1.2.2modifiedasaldhanavaria/src/resources/jmx/jmx-console-web.xmlJBAS-3311: Provide access control to JMX ops in the JMX console1.1.2.2modifiedbstansberrytestsuite/src/resources/cluster/http/testsessionreplication.jspReduce the life of the session so tests run faster1.2.8.1deletedasaldhanavaria/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/html/JMXOpsAccessControlFilter.javafile JMXOpsAccessControlFilter.java was added on branch Branch_3_2 on 2006-06-22 19:00:36 +1.41.2.49modifieddimitrisvaria/build.xmlJBAS-3204 - split snmp-support.jar content to the original joesnmp.jar & log4j-snmp-appender.jar1.10.2.3modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/perf/META-INF/ejb-jar.xml[JBAS-3192] get org.jboss.test.perf tests passing1.3.2.3modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/secure-perf/META-INF/ejb-jar.xml[JBAS-3192] get org.jboss.test.perf tests passing1.1.2.43modifieddimitristools/etc/buildmagic/buildmagic.enttoward 3.2.8.SP21.1.2.18modifieddimitristools/etc/buildmagic/version-info.xmltoward 3.2.8.SP21.1.2.2modifieddimitristomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc4/authenticator/SingleSignOnEntry.javaJBAS-2466, tidy up the license1.1.2.26modifiedasaldhanatomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/TomcatDeployer.javaJBAS-3152:Ungraceful exit of JBossCacheManager Installation1.1.4.3modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas1665/META-INF/ejb-jar.xmla testcase for JBAS-3095 Error in Compiling EJB-QL Statement1.1.4.3modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas1665/META-INF/jbosscmp-jdbc.xmla testcase for JBAS-3095 Error in Compiling EJB-QL Statement1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas979/META-INF/ejb-jar.xmla testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas979/META-INF/jboss.xmla testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas979/META-INF/jbosscmp-jdbc.xmla testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/ABean.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/ALocal.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/ALocalHome.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/Facade.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/FacadeHome.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/FacadeSessionBean.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.2modifiedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/jbas979/JBAS979UnitTestCase.javaa testcase for JBAS-979 flushCache issue1.1.2.1deletedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas979/META-INF/ejb-jar.xmlfile ejb-jar.xml was added on branch Branch_3_2 on 2006-04-21 10:06:08 +1.1.2.1deletedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas979/META-INF/jboss.xmlfile jboss.xml was added on branch Branch_3_2 on 2006-04-21 10:06:08 +1.1.2.1deletedaloubyanskytestsuite/src/resources/cmp2/jbas979/META-INF/jbosscmp-jdbc.xmlfile jbosscmp-jdbc.xml was added on branch Bra

Re: [JBoss-dev] JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today)

2006-06-28 Thread Eric Brown
Just wanted to update everyone... We have patched jira.jboss.com with
a fix prepared by Sohil that seems to have fixed the session hang issues.
It's been submitted for inclusion in the 3.6.3 release:

http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRA-10504

Please let us know if you see any more issues with hung connections.
We think this will solve the issues.

Also, I'd like to thank Ryan and Sohil for helping iron out the problems
today.  And to Sohil for finding this bug and making a patch in a matter
of hours, having never looked at the Jira src until lunch today... Truly
impressive.

Great work Sohil :)


> From: Eric Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:02:10 -0500
> To: The Core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> Cc: QA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Conversation: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT
> Today)
> Subject: Re: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT
> Today)
> 
> We have run into a nasty bug in the latest JIRA that is causing
> session hangs for many people (seems to be related to JRA-10105
> here: http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRA-10105).  We're working
> this from several angles, including our support contract with
> Atlassian and will update everyone as soon as possible.
> 
> Until we get a resolution, consider JIRA to be unstable (we'd
> take it down, but the bug only shows up under high load and we
> may have a way to reset the sessions on a cron for the short term)
> and make sure you are tracking changes made since last night so
> we can roll back the data in the event a quick resolution is not
> in site (we'll compare the DB's also, but it helps if we have
> a route list of effected issues, etc.).  If you can hold off on
> updates for a few hours while we figure out what our options are,
> please do.
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience and we'll update everyone ASAP.
> 
> 
>> From: Ryan Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:01:00 -0500
>> To: The Core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
>> Cc: QA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Conversation: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT
>> Today)
>> Subject: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today)
>> 
>> This is complete; the JIRA server is online.
>> 
>> Please report any issues to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> .
>> 
>> _
>> From: Ryan Campbell
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:15 AM
>> To: The Core; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Cc: QA; IT Ops
>> Subject: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today
>> 
>> We are upgrading the JIRA instance to a faster box, and the latest version of
>> JIRA.  The main purpose of this upgrade is reduced downtime and improved
>> performance.
>> 
>> JIRA will go down at 8 PM EDT.  It will remain offline until the migration is
>> complete.  I expect it to be back online early in the morning, EDT, and will
>> send out a notice once the new server is live.
>> 
>> See below for the new features you can expect from this upgrade:
>> 
>> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.3+Release+Notes
>> 
>> 
>> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.4+and+3.4.1+Release+Notes
>> 
>
s
>>> 
>> 
>> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.5+Release+Notes
>> 
>> 
>> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.6+Release+Notes
>> 
>> 
>> In addition to this, we will be deploying the Fisheye plugin for more
>> reliable
>> integration with CVS and SVN.
>> 
>> As a note, this deployment will only include the ³Release Notes Report²
>> custom
>> plugin.  The additional Global Reports (developer involvement, issues closed,
>> developers per project, etc) will be deployed at a later, to be determined
>> time.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ryan Campbell
>> 
>> QA Manager
>> 
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> 


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jbossweb build.104 Build Successful

2006-06-28 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbossweb?log=log20060628224756Lbuild.104
BUILD COMPLETE - build.104Date of build: 06/28/2006 22:47:56Time to build: 35 minutes 22 seconds




    Unit Tests: (0)    Total Errors and Failures: (0) 
 Modifications since last build: (first 50 of 0)

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jbossweb-windows build.38 Build Successful

2006-06-28 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbossweb-windows?log=log20060628220041Lbuild.38
BUILD COMPLETE - build.38Date of build: 06/28/2006 22:00:41Time to build: 47 minutes 5 seconds




    Unit Tests: (0)    Total Errors and Failures: (0) 
 Modifications since last build: (first 50 of 0)

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix Build Failed

2006-06-28 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060628204055
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:212: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-common-targets.xml:70: Unable to delete directory /services/cruisecontrol/work/checkout/jboss-head/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.Alpha/server/default/work/jboss.web/localhost/web-consoleDate of build: 06/28/2006 20:40:55Time to build: 3 minutes 10 secondsLast changed: 06/28/2006 20:28:03Last log entry: Add setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues




    Unit Tests: (0)    Total Errors and Failures: (0) 
 Modifications since last build: (first 50 of 10)1.7modifiedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/pointcut/CFlow.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.1addedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/pointcut/SecurityActions.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.35modifiedkkhanaop/.classpathAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.146modifiedkkhanaop/build.xmlAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.160modifiedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/AspectManager.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.149modifiedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/ClassAdvisor.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.1addedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/SecurityActions.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.12modifiedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/util/MethodHashing.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.1addedkkhanaop/src/main/org/jboss/aop/util/SecurityActions.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues1.2modifiedkkhanaop/src/test/org/jboss/test/aop/AOPTest.javaAdd setup to tests to easily be enable to enable a security manager.Start resolving security issues

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] EJB3 module in HEAD build takes time

2006-06-28 Thread Anil Saldhana
While building HEAD, the ejb3 module takes extra time in extracting 
(unjar)  the dependencies and repackaging them.  Any chance of speeding 
this up?

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix build.1182 Build Fixed

2006-06-28 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060628125035Lbuild.1182
BUILD COMPLETE - build.1182Date of build: 06/28/2006 12:50:35Time to build: 49 minutes 40 secondsLast changed: 06/28/2006 11:58:09Last log entry: Removed commons-lang




    Unit Tests: (0)    Total Errors and Failures: (0) 
 Modifications since last build: (first 50 of 2)1.1.2.144modifiedssilvertbuild/build-thirdparty.xmlRemoved commons-lang1.1.2.143modifiedbstansberrybuild/build-thirdparty.xmlUse JBoss Cache 1.4.0.CR2

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.

2006-06-28 Thread Jason T. Greene
How is this a gimmick? It's semantically equivalent to an lb node status 
monitor. Traffic should not be sent to nodes that aren't up. 

-Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: Sacha Labourey; Robb Greathouse; Stan Silvert; Ryan Campbell;
> 'JBoss.org development list'; Scott M Stark
> Cc: The Core; Bill Burke
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.
> 
> > Better integration between Apache and tomcat through Mod_jk is something
> > you need to work on with Mladen: there is huge value in having the web
> > container communicate status information back to the web server (server
> > goes down, shutdown cluster, extend cluster size, new nodes, etc.)
> >
> > We need to start working on these end-to-end features: restarting an
> > application should be a smooth action for the user: if we have multiple
> > nodes the Apache LB should be made aware of that and use a different
> node
> > in the meantime.
> >
> > Mladen and Rémy, you should start adding JIRA tasks for this.
> 
> Sure, I have no problem with that.
> 
> I told you it's a bad idea: at best this capability is a useless gimmick.
> Beyond that, you can decide on the direction you want to follow and we'll
> (try to) implement it (and hopefully it will bring in more sales :) ).
> 
> Rémy


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.

2006-06-28 Thread Elias Ross

[Not really responding to this but I lost the first messages]

I'd like to see a mode where during redeployment the server waits for
the single deployment to reappear before processing the request.  Even a
really large deployment usually takes less than 10 seconds, so the user
would never have to see any sort of outage or HTTP error and no
reconfiguring of the load balancer would be necessary.  Obviously, you
would need to have some sort of time-out.



Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.

2006-06-28 Thread Jason T. Greene
I disagree. Why should a user be expected to restart the ENTIRE application 
server, when only a single deployment is changing? There are ways to do this 
that minimizes outage. Typically you do manual rolling update across all nodes. 
This process though can be somewhat of a pain in the ass (take one node out of 
the lb, add another), which is why I have always thought we should offer an 
automated tool for this. Most modern load balancers have an API for this kind 
of thing.

-Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:37 AM
> To: Robb Greathouse; Sacha Labourey; Stan Silvert; Ryan Campbell;
> 'JBoss.org development list'; Scott M Stark
> Cc: The Core; Bill Burke
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.
> 
> > Oh, thanks for clarification.
> >
> > When a app starts undeployment there are two possible cases.  1) It is
> > being redeployed, and should return a 500 plus and 2) It is being
> > undeployed for good and should return a 404.
> >
> > Maybe what is required is a configurable retry period.  After a app is
> > undeployed it could wait a defined number of seconds to see if it comes
> > back.  If it does not comeback after 5 or 10 seconds then Tomcat could
> > conclude it was undeployed.  Otherwise it would retry the request on the
> > same machine without failover.
> 
> There's an interface on mod_jk to allow configuring workers "manually"
> when you expect to do maintenance. I'm not he one coding mod_jk, so if
> they want to do it and code something automagical, they can ;)
> 
> Similarly, while autodeployment is cool in development or when doing pre
> production testing, I don't think it is realistic to use it in real
> production environments.
> 
> Rémy


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today)

2006-06-28 Thread Eric Brown
We have run into a nasty bug in the latest JIRA that is causing
session hangs for many people (seems to be related to JRA-10105
here: http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRA-10105).  We're working
this from several angles, including our support contract with
Atlassian and will update everyone as soon as possible.

Until we get a resolution, consider JIRA to be unstable (we'd
take it down, but the bug only shows up under high load and we
may have a way to reset the sessions on a cron for the short term)
and make sure you are tracking changes made since last night so
we can roll back the data in the event a quick resolution is not
in site (we'll compare the DB's also, but it helps if we have
a route list of effected issues, etc.).  If you can hold off on
updates for a few hours while we figure out what our options are,
please do.

Sorry for the inconvenience and we'll update everyone ASAP.


> From: Ryan Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:01:00 -0500
> To: The Core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> Cc: QA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Conversation: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT
> Today)
> Subject: JIRA back online (was RE: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today)
> 
> This is complete; the JIRA server is online.
> 
> Please report any issues to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> .
> 
> _
> From: Ryan Campbell
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:15 AM
> To: The Core; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: QA; IT Ops
> Subject: JIRA Downtime/Upgrade at 8 PM EDT Today
> 
> We are upgrading the JIRA instance to a faster box, and the latest version of
> JIRA.  The main purpose of this upgrade is reduced downtime and improved
> performance.
> 
> JIRA will go down at 8 PM EDT.  It will remain offline until the migration is
> complete.  I expect it to be back online early in the morning, EDT, and will
> send out a notice once the new server is live.
> 
> See below for the new features you can expect from this upgrade:
> 
> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.3+Release+Notes
> 
> 
> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.4+and+3.4.1+Release+Notes
>  >  
> 
> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.5+Release+Notes
> 
> 
> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/JIRA+3.6+Release+Notes
> 
> 
> In addition to this, we will be deploying the Fisheye plugin for more reliable
> integration with CVS and SVN.
> 
> As a note, this deployment will only include the ³Release Notes Report² custom
> plugin.  The additional Global Reports (developer involvement, issues closed,
> developers per project, etc) will be deployed at a later, to be determined
> time.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryan Campbell
> 
> QA Manager
> 
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.

2006-06-28 Thread Scott M Stark
Only on shutdown of the server. Its independent of tomcat5/6.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Sacha Labourey 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 7:30 AM
> To: Robb Greathouse; Stan Silvert; Ryan Campbell; 'JBoss.org 
> development list'; Scott M Stark
> Cc: The Core; Bill Burke
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.
> 
> That is a good point and I thought this had been solved some 
> time ago? 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robb Greathouse
> > Sent: mercredi, 28. juin 2006 16:14
> > To: Stan Silvert; Ryan Campbell; 'JBoss.org development 
> list'; Scott M 
> > Stark
> > Cc: The Core; Bill Burke
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 redeploy.
> > 
> > Will Tomcat 6 have better integration with JBoss and Apache?  
> > I've seen a recurring problem with Tomcat 5 returning 404's during 
> > redeployment.  If it returned a 500 plus error it would 
> force apache 
> > to fail-over.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stan Silvert
> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:04 AM
> > To: Ryan Campbell; 'JBoss.org development list'; Scott M Stark
> > Cc: The Core; Bill Burke
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 integrated
> > 
> > > 
> > > So, head should only be compilable with a 1.5 jdk.
> > > 
> > > However, some modules will still enforce source & target 
> at 1.4, so 
> > > that we can back merge fixes to the jboss4 tree.
> > > 
> > > Correct?
> > >
> > 
> > What's the latest on this?  The JSF integration code under 
> the Tomcat 
> > module needs JDK 1.5 to compile.  I can change it to be 
> 1.4-compatible 
> > if I have to.
> > 
> > Stan Silvert
> > JBoss, a division of RedHat
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ryan Campbell
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:16 PM
> > > To: JBoss.org development list; Scott M Stark
> > > Cc: The Core; Bill Burke
> > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 integrated
> > > 
> > > So, head should only be compilable with a 1.5 jdk.
> > > 
> > > However, some modules will still enforce source & target 
> at 1.4, so 
> > > that we can back merge fixes to the jboss4 tree.
> > > 
> > > Correct?
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:jboss-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Anil Saldhana
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 11:10 AM
> > > To: Scott M Stark
> > > Cc: JBoss.org development list; The Core; Bill Burke
> > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 integrated
> > > 
> > > Ruel is looking into this.  The issue is that the Tomcat jars need
> > > JDK5 for compilation and the way the current HEAD build is
> > setup, we
> > > may have some issues.
> > > 
> > > Scott M Stark wrote:
> > > > The tomcat module needs jdk5, not all of head. jboss5
> > will require a
> > > > jdk5 runtime.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: Anil Saldhana
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:06 AM
> > > >> To: JBoss.org development list
> > > >> Cc: Bill Burke; The Core
> > > >> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat 6 integrated
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Scott,
> > > >> with regard to the current TC6 integration that Bill
> > undertook
> > > >> in HEAD:
> > > >>http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3330
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=85382
> > > >>
> > > >> This has placed a need for JDK5 in HEAD as TC6 needs it.
> > > >>
> > > >> You will need to make a decision to make HEAD requiring JDK5.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Anil
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
> > services, security?
> > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
> > make your job
> > > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on 
> > > Apache Geronimo
> > > 
> > 
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=1216
> > > 42 ___
> > > JBoss-Development mailing list
> > > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > 

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-28 Thread Scott M Stark
Yes. 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Alexey Loubyansky
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:13 AM
> To: JBoss.org development list
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to 
> build-thirdparty.xml?
> 
> About  in component-info.xml.
> I checked the component-info.xml for jbossxb. It doesn't 
> contain any imports while there are dependencies at least on 
> xerces and oswego concurrent.
> Should I declare them?
> 

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] JBossXB dependencies

2006-06-28 Thread Heiko Braun
The latest XB version introduced a dependency towards JAF and Java Mail.
Currently these jars reside under /server//lib and are
not visible to the XB classloader. Moving them to /lib doesn't
work, because the bootstrap process uses a hard coded set of libraries.

The current workaround is to move JAF & Mail to lib/endorsed, in order
to have them available at bootstrap time.

Does someone have an idea how to solve this problem without

a) modifying the bootstrap classes
b) using that workaround ?

/Heiko


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml?

2006-06-28 Thread Alexey Loubyansky
About  in component-info.xml.
I checked the component-info.xml for jbossxb. It doesn't contain any 
imports while there are dependencies at least on xerces and oswego 
concurrent.
Should I declare them?

Scott M Stark wrote:
> If jstl is not part of the myfaces dist it should not be bundled with
> it. If it is part of the myfaces dist but could be used elsewhere then
> it could be separated if there is such a usecase. If it is part of the
> myfaces dist I would not unbundled jstl until there is an independent
> need for jstl. See "Thirdparty Dependency and Maintenance" in the
> following for an example of how to declare dependencies in a component.
> http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossBuild
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Stan Silvert
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:00 PM
> To: JBoss.org development list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to
> build-thirdparty.xml?
> 
> Got itI think.
> 
> So right now in the repository we have:
> 
> apache-myfaces/1.1.1/lib/myfaces-api.jar
> apache-myfaces/1.1.1/lib/myfaces-impl.jar
> apache-myfaces/1.1.1/lib/jstl.jar
> 
> What happens when a new component wants to use jstl.jar?  
> How would anyone easily know that jstl already exists in the repository?
> How does anyone know what version of jstl has been bundled with MyFaces?
> 
> It would make more sense to let jstl have its own space in the
> repository:
> apache-jstl/1.0.0/lib/jstl.jar
> 
> If this is done then is there currently a way to let
> apache-myfaces/1.1.1/component-info.xml reference version 1.0.0 from
> apache-jstl?
> 
> If so, I'd like to take that approach.
> 
> Stan Silvert
> JBoss, a division of RedHat
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:26 PM
>> To: JBoss.org development list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-
>> thirdparty.xml?
>>
>> Only the top component that needs to be integrated should be in
>> build-thirdparty.xml. Anything else added was due to the same
> confusion
>> you have.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of Stan Silvert
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:39 PM
>>> To: JBoss.org development list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to
>>> build-thirdparty.xml?
>>>
>>> OK, I guess I'm confused.  When we started using the
>>> repository someone broke out all the jars that MyFaces needs
>>> and put them in build-thirdparty.xml.  (All except jstl.jar?)
>>>  So that's the pattern I followed.
>>>
>>> However, it doesn't appear that anything except MyFaces
>>> relies on jars such as commons-beanutils.jar and the others
>>> that end up in jsf-libs.
>>>
>>> Is it the rule that if more than one component relies on a
>>> jar then it goes in build-thirdparty.xml?  If so, why were
>>> those others put in there and how do I know if more than one
>>> component relies on it?
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>> Also, what do I need to do to fix it all?
>>>
>>> Stan Silvert
>>> JBoss, a division of RedHat
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:jboss-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>> Scott M Stark
 Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:15 PM
 To: JBoss.org development list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to build-
 thirdparty.xml?

 Then this should be coming in as a dependency from the myfaces
 component, not a jbossas build-thirdparty.xml dependency.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of
 Stan Silvert
 Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:23 PM
 To: JBoss.org development list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to
 build-thirdparty.xml?

 It was needed for the MyFaces upgrade.

 Stan Silvert
 JBoss, a division of RedHat
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M
>>> Stark
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 7:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Why was apache-lang added to
 build-thirdparty.xml?
> Why was apache-lang added to build-thirdparty.xml in the
>>> 4.0 branch?
> 
> Scott Stark
> VP Architecture & Technology
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> 
>
>
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
 security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make
> your
>>> job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on
> Apach