___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
,
Adrian
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Brock
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
:173)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.stop(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:240)
I think this is caused by the JMX 1.2 checkin in the 3.2 branch.
Any idea of a workaround ?
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Brock
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 7:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is the purpose of the Translatable
interfacein head?
This was something I added to remove aop's direct dependency on the UCL.
It allows aop to be used
Of
Adrian Brock
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 7:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] What is the purpose of the
Translatableinterfacein head?
I think this is a javassist callback?
Regards,
Adrian
---
This SF.net
admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
with it yet.
Ivelin
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX
worry
about closing sessions. Reduces the need for these
pesky try/catch/finally.
Since the Hibernate session is on top of a DataSource,
which is hopefully pooled, there is no need to pool
sessions.
Does this make sense, or I missed your point?
Ivelin
--- Adrian Brock [EMAIL
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up
times you would need to add a JMS interceptor
to the chain, but these would represent invocation times
of jbossmq's internal protocol rather than the jms interfaces.
Regards,
Adrian
Cheers,
Sacha
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email
/RMIAdaptor uses jboss's invoker framework,
in particular the JRMPInvoker
In 3.2 jmx:${host.name}:rmi is now just aliased to
jmx/invoker/RMIAdaptor
But it still exists as a real deployment in HEAD.
Regards,
Adrian
Thank you.
Adrian Brock wrote:
Try it with the RMI invoker adapter
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 14:09, Bill Burke wrote:
I think buildmagic files were moved around. One shapshot I had recently
wouldn't build, but I got latest, and it worked.
I am very conservative when it comes to checking for changes.
If build/build.xml, module/build.xml, tools or thirdparty
,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you
/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:22, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:11 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:08, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of the whole stuff defined
in
XSD and throuw the ugly DTD's away?
Then one is able
/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
in
the login-config.xml ?
The interaction (check username/password match) will
be initiated by a custom JBoss service and the
security domain will be defined in the corresponding
-service.xml file.
thanks,
=
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss
us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
it was to write
a custom JCA adapter. It turned out to be fairly clean implementation when
all was said and done but a pain getting that JCA adapter written. Any
other way ends up being a coding nightmare or a deployment nightmare.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
changes/fixes like
TransactionLocal and MBeanServerLocator.locateJBoss() (others I would
find while doing it?)
Is that acceptable?
3.0 does not properly support OracleXA which is a spec unto itself :-)
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss
is installed on the client.
Regards,
Adrian
Of course, the
PooledInvoker won't work with older versions, but any RMI invocations
should be ok with new class types.
Bill
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
in org.jboss
OPEN - unassigned
791439HA-JNDI not replicating bindings
OPEN - sacha
789318ObjectMessage.getObject() doesn't work in JBoss 3.2.1
OPEN - unassigned
786668Form-based Authentication drops Subject
OPEN - unassigned
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian
of a -service.xml file.
Not a critical fix.
What about the plugin manager? Can the synchronization be easily
fixed? This bug hangs the deployment thread.
Regards,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: vendredi
, Time elapsed: 359.732
sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.UIL2InvocationLayerStressTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 99.531
sec
Notice how slow RMI is, compared with plain sockets.
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
of afterCompletion, a few lines after the cache remove().
The cache takes one during the passivation.
Two lock refs.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock wrote:
That is because the instance synchronization still holds the lock
reference.
The cache also takes a lock reference at passivation
)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor39.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back
Gunnerus gt. 2 / P.O. Box 805 Sentrum, 0104 Oslo
http://www.conduct.no mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
On mandag, sep 22, 2003, at 09:30 Europe/Amsterdam, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The problem that I'm seeing is that the old compatibility
is still being checked out (but it is empty). This is then
overwritten with the correct module.
But the CVS/Repository is still referring
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
. The whole invoker/proxy factory/interceptor layer needs to be cleaned
up to have a more consistent api and usage.
Adrian Brock wrote:
Is there a reason why this is in the jrmp package?
I don't see anything JRMP specific?
But then what's in a name :-)
Regards,
Adrian
Not receiving any mails from sourceforge?
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss
Apologies that should JRMPProxyFactory
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:20, Adrian Brock wrote:
Is there a reason why this is in the jrmp package?
I don't see anything JRMP specific?
But then what's in a name :-)
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back
Is there a reason why this is in the jrmp package?
I don't see anything JRMP specific?
But then what's in a name :-)
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
Hi,
The compatibility module has been tagged with Branch_3_2 on the MAIN
branch rather than branched.
Any cvs experts know how to fix it?
Regards.
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:15, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it is possible to remove a tag, and then make a branch, but I
am not an expert...
cvs rtag -d TAG module
Backup is recommended prior to execute this command
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 21:51, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:15, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it is possible to remove a tag, and then make a branch, but I
am not an expert...
cvs rtag -d TAG module
Backup
email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director
guarantee over-the-wire compatibility only for a
specific branch. over-the-wire compatibility should be breakable
between major releases.
Adrian Brock wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 23:00, Bill Burke wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't be able to improve raw, over-the-wire, remote
. This is in the
JBossManagedConnectionPool.getConnection(Subject subject, ConnectionRequestInfo
cri)?
Doesn't this depend upon how security is configured?
Perhaps there is someway to make the pooling strategy implementation
more pluggable?
Can we move these non-private discussions to the dev list?
Done
Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi
/jboss-development
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss
ManagedConnectionFactory.getConnectionProperties, which also does this
processing, is showing up as a bottleneck.
I would guess Set.equals(Set) is an expensive process?
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
not there you need to be able to specify the target's
local-jndi-name.
This would help when porting from weblogic which has a similar
descriptor.
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available
Read this post.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09106.ht
ml
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce
Hi David,
I'm gradually working my way through the same patch for 3.2 now as
we speak.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Scott just fixed it.
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alexey Loubyansky
Sent: 21 June 2003 12:55
To: jboss-dev
Hi Scott,
I've been seeing the same errors
and it was not accepting my password sometimes.
I was just persistent.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi Luke,
In head, the plan is to use jsr160 and
the MBeanServerConnection interface
from jmx1.2
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Hi David,
Did you forget to commit stylesheets/JMSMDBTemplate.xsl?
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Hi Ulf,
People use different strategies.
Some apply fixes at the same time,
others apply them in bulk.
I tend to mix the two, keeping
the diffs of things I've not
applied to head.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
Yes,
It means applying the patch to more branches.
The next branch from head probably won't be
until the end of this year.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Which page are you looking at?
Here is the information you want.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=htmlop=userdisplayid=developers
/guides/cvs-admin
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
Hi Andrew,
David has been working on some thread management stuff
for the Work contract in jca 1.5
I think it is still very simple at the moment.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original
jboss-head in the connector module
org.jboss.resource.work
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver
Sent
Yes it is a bug.
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Micha Drozd
Sent: 30 May 2003 02:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Chris,
Why are the linux tests running against the default
instead of the all configuration?
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Translated in line, Fagerlund-English
Never used Mckoi. From cvs it doesn't look
very active (but that might mean it is stable?)
and it is all one developer?
e.g.
http://cvs.mckoi.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mckoi-sql/src/com/mckoi/database/
Regards,
Adrian
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bill,
I changed the ejb verifier to allow InvocationTargetException.
I'll disallow it again :-)
Regards,
Adrian
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:24 -0500
Igor,
I couldn't
Hi,
Commit option C was broken by the removal of the
passivation thread. It self deadlockeds.
Not guilty, but I'm fixing it as penance
for my dyslexic canPassivate() method :-)
Regards,
Adrian
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
We've started talking about doing this
about a six months ago. But it has never been
a priority.
The original reason for the separate implementation
was that Juha wanted jbossmx to run standalone
without other jboss jars, and at the time
common's logging couldn't be turned off
and so required
Bloody CVS merge putting jboss.jmx back in!
Why didn't common compile over Sun's RI,
it did for me?
Regards,
Adrian
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 build broken for a while
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:35:44 -0800
Doh! I see, I didn't commit common/build.xml
+1 Guiness for me, sorry.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 build broken for a while
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:32:58 +
Bloody CVS merge putting
Hi,
This would work if there was a way to configure it.
See the FIXME in ModelMBeanInvoker.preRegister
Regards,
Adrian
From: David Klimek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.mx.interceptor: Does it work?
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003
another path more like the EJB stuff (when yout
binds a proxy for an MBean its will create an invoker with the
classloader and therefore it will have acces to it. I don't know if it
will work, we will see.
//Peter
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 05:29, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi Peter,
You shamed me into testing my
Hi Peter,
You shamed me into testing my alternate implementation
of the RMI adaptor, which is now committed in 3.2
This implementation uses the jboss invokers with
late de-marshalling so it can be performed with the
correct classloader.
The three config parameters are
JNDIName - for binding the
Ignore it, it is a DEBUG message.
The class is only required on jre1.4 to workaround a
bug in that version's RMI caching.
I'll change it to a TRACE, to avoid this
question in future.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Patrick Mau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBoss Development [EMAIL
Thanks David,
Don't know how that happened, I always run a cvs diff
which tells me if I've missed a cvs add.
Maybe I forgot this time?
Regards,
Adrian
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem with the 3.0 branch
Hi Scott,
This is copy on write.
It works best when modifications are infrequent
compared to access.
e.g. connecting to a jms topic (modification)
and broadcasting messages to the connections (iteration).
Dain's version would copy on every message, rather than
only when a client
Hi,
Just a heads up to see whether this change is deliberate?
In 3.2, if you create a subfolder in server/[config]/deploy with
deployables in it, the JARDeployer deploys them.
e.g. server/default/deploy/dead/http-invoker.sar
It doesn't deploy xml files.
This doesn't happen in 3.0
I only
Scott Stark wrote:
I thought 3.0 had this same behavior. In the last training someone had
created
a server/all/deploy/farm directory and placed an ejb-jar into this
directory and it was
deployed.
Ok, sorry for noise.
I probably didn't spot it had started doing it until now?
I actually delete
Doesn't j2ee 1.4 require j2se 1.4 by spec?
Regards,
Adrian
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: JavaGroups
[EMAIL PROTECTED],JavaGroups
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [javagroups-users] Survey: JDK 1.4 versus JDK
1.3
Date:
Head should compile now.
Looks like xdoclet changed?
Regards,
Adrian
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Main is not building
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:47:09 -0800
The server module in jboss-head is not currently
Hi David,
I'm not seeing Scott's problems
Windows XP
j2sdk1.4.1_01
ant-1.5.1 (October 2 2002)
I'm seeing problems with the command line and
the Builder task. It passes all system and
environment properties.
But it doesn't work very well when a value contains
a space, e.g. Documents and Settings
Full CVS checkout requested.
Regards,
Adrian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:35:29 GMT
Hi David,
I fixed/simplified the system client factory.
It was creating duplicate MBeanServers.
I don't think running with multiple MBeanServers
will work with some of assumptions made by
the current code.
e.g. The UnifiedLoaderRepository is JVM wide
but classloaders are registered in a single
Hi Dain,
cd jboss-head
cvs get _jboss_thirdparty
cvs update and aliases don't work properly :-(
Regards,
Adrian
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBoss-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] New thirdparty structure sucks
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002
Hi Chris,
I ran head tests yesterday, there are still
time-outs relating to the trunk invokers,
but it does complete.
Windows XP 1Ghz P3 java 1.4
Mandrake 8.1 450Mhz P2 java 1.3
Have you tried a thread-dump to see whether
there is a deadlock?
Regards,
Adrian
From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL
module.
./build.sh tests
Regards,
Chris
--- Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris,
I ran head tests yesterday, there are still
time-outs relating to the trunk invokers,
but it does complete.
Windows XP 1Ghz P3 java 1.4
Mandrake 8.1 450Mhz P2 java 1.3
Have you tried a thread-dump
Hi,
I've already put some code in 4.0 to sort the Domains/MBeans.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [jmx-console] changes to support multiple boolean
operations
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:53:56 -0800
Emerson,
./run.sh -c all
David.
Your fix from 4.0 works in 3.0 with some small modifications,
but it broke the MBean context classloader.
Don't worry, I've fixed it in head.
I want to change registerMBean to automatically pick up the current
context classloader, just like it does when you
Hi Matt,
Juha has applied his changes for the MBean Invocations/Interceptors
He has probably accidently removed it during the merge from the
juhasstuff branch. Feel free to put it back.
He removed one my fixes as well :-)
Regards,
Adrian
From: Matt Munz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
Hi Bill,
The module name for HEAD was changed from jboss-all to jboss-head
last week.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] HEAD will not build
Date: Tue, 15 Oct
-0400
Does the same apply to all branches???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Adrian Brock
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD will not build
Hi Bill,
The module
801 - 900 of 1497 matches
Mail list logo
