RE: [JBoss-dev] Tyrex transaction manager

2003-06-26 Thread Fred Hartman
Maybe this is a production DTM option although I don't know the cost. Cheers, Fred -Original Message- From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Tyrex

RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2

2003-04-12 Thread Fred Hartman
Fred, Could you please let me know the advance of this project? I am interested in it and willing to help setting up the environment. Cheers, Sacha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Hartman Sent

RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2

2003-04-12 Thread Fred Hartman
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Hartman Sent: dimanche, 13. avril 2003 00:15 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Daily tests v2 The idea is a simple build.xml with minimal setup (cvs client, Ant, a JDK, a couple modifications to an Ant properties file

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-21 Thread Fred Hartman
Don't be too sure that there isn't a number of months of effort to pass the conformance suite. There are lots of edge cases and areas of interpretation when implementing from a spec. There are also stupid things in specs that implementers chose to implement differently with just cause. Certainly

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMS reliability (?)

2003-02-02 Thread Fred Hartman
Can you clarify this recommendation? It sounds like you said 3.2 is better, but use 3.0.x. Is this solely because 3.2 isn't quite baked yet or is there another reason to stick with 3.0.x? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Lindsey

[JBoss-dev] Jetty addListener/removeListener exception

2003-01-21 Thread Fred Hartman
Using JBoss/Jetty 3.0.3. I have an MBean that dynamically adds and removes SocketListeners from Jetty HttpServer. It looks like there is a problem in main/org/mortbay/http/ public void setHttpServer(HttpServer server) { Code.assertTrue(_server==null ||

RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple JBoss/Jetty Instances - BindException: Address already in use

2003-01-08 Thread Fred Hartman
These are the ports I know about. It looks like the each one of these services has to either have the port settings modified or to use an optional attribute line bindAddress or serverAddress to change the IP used. 8080 - default Jetty HTTP port. The default port can be changed using:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Jsp compilation Problem with Jboss3.0-jetty and Red Linux7.2

2002-12-27 Thread Fred Hartman
sun/tools/javac/Main is in tools.jar. Put that on your system classpath before launching JBoss or you can copy it into jre/lib/ext so it automagically gets picked up. -Fred -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of BrijeshSent:

RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-12-16 Thread Fred Hartman
I've gotten compiling problems on the 3.0 Branch when using -d. When I stick with just -P life is good. -Fred -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Fawcett Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Exploded format in JBoss

2002-11-26 Thread Fred Hartman
I assume you can define where that is by enabling the following MBean in jboss-service.xml: !-- An alternate hot deployer mbean. Use URLDirectoryScanner if you need to specify which urls are directories to scan, and which are urls to be deployed directly. URLDeploymentScanner assumes