[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-53) Problem during classloading on certain classloaders

2005-02-01 Thread Jeff Haynie (JIRA)
Problem during classloading on certain classloaders --- Key: JBREM-53 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-53 Project: JBoss Remoting Type: Bug Reporter: Jeff Haynie Assigned to: Jeff Haynie Problem

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBREM-49) Problem with loading an array class remotely

2005-01-28 Thread Jeff Haynie (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-49?page=history ] Jeff Haynie closed JBREM-49: Resolution: Done Committed to Branch_3_2 Problem with loading an array class remotely Key: JBREM-49

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-49) Problem with loading an array class remotely

2005-01-26 Thread Jeff Haynie (JIRA)
Problem with loading an array class remotely Key: JBREM-49 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-49 Project: JBoss Remoting Type: Bug Reporter: Jeff Haynie Assigned to: Tom Elrod Problem when you try

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-871649 ] Problem with source of JMX Notifications

2004-01-06 Thread Jeff Haynie
://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=871649group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Haynie (jhaynie) Assigned to: Jeff Haynie (jhaynie) Summary: Problem with source of JMX Notifications Initial Comment

Re: [JBoss-dev] Remoting and NAT traversal, advanced network

2004-01-06 Thread Jeff Haynie
Scott M Stark eloquently wrote the following on 1/6/2004 1:44 PM: The MBeanTracker appears to be a composite of the proxy factory and lookup services currently used and is where the NAT configuration would have to be I would guess. Does this layer support: - A client side interceptor stack -

Re: [JBoss-dev] New JBoss Monitoring services

2004-01-06 Thread Jeff Haynie
We use http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/ with JBoss on both Windows and Linux and it handles all of this out-of-the-box (restart failure, retry logic, etc.) I would recommend it instead of rolling your own. They've even got a MBean for managing restarts, etc. I'll be glad to

Re: [JBoss-dev] New JBoss Monitoring services

2004-01-06 Thread Jeff Haynie
We also have written a native (via JNI) library for getting all the system level information such as CPU load, handles, threads, memory, etc. and we have a framework that fires JMX snapshot notifications (configurable). Our management server then monitors these snapshots and our analytics

Re: [JBoss-dev] New JBoss Monitoring services

2004-01-06 Thread Jeff Haynie
you're ignoring him. Jeff Ivelin Ivanov wrote: Would it use native code to restart the JBoss services or would it just ask the deployers to undeploy and redeploy all services? Ivelin --- Jeff Haynie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We use http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/ with JBoss

[JBoss-dev] Remoting and NAT traversal, advanced network

2004-01-05 Thread Jeff Haynie
We have a customer that needs to use JBoss Remoting / JMX Remoting in a fairly complex, although not unusual, network configuration. Right now, we don't well support dynamic / NAT traversals for remoting either in detection or transport. We basically send the local machines address (which

[JBoss-dev] Build not working with Ant 1.6.0

2004-01-05 Thread Jeff Haynie
C:\cvs\jboss-3.2\buildant Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: BUILD FAILED C:\cvs\jboss-3.2\tools\etc\buildmagic\buildmagic.ent:25: Unsupported Ant version: Apache Ant version 1.6.0 compiled on December 18 2003 Please install a version which is compatible with Ant 1.5. Total time: 1

Re: [JBoss-dev] Build not working with Ant 1.6.0

2004-01-05 Thread Jeff Haynie
version: ${ant.version} Please install a version which is compatible with Ant ${buildmagic.ant.baseversion}. /fail Regards, Adrian On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 22:59, Jeff Haynie wrote: C:\cvs\jboss-3.2\buildant Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: BUILD FAILED C:\cvs\jboss-3.2\tools\etc

Re: [JBoss-dev] Remoting and NAT traversal, advanced network

2004-01-05 Thread Jeff Haynie
. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] Remoting and NAT

[JBoss-dev] ServiceController MBean unload ordering

2004-01-05 Thread Jeff Haynie
Obscure question: Is there a way to instruct the ServiceController to unload an MBean (as near) at the end of the lifecycle of all the other mbeans? Use case: In remoting, ideally you want to have the remoting framework load at the last possible minute so that notifications from all the other

[JBoss-dev] Remoting and JMX Remoting Fixes

2004-01-04 Thread Jeff Haynie
I've commited a handful of fixes/improvements to remoting and jmx-remoting I've found during testing and profiling our application related to memory growth and dangling threads. - I've added a slight improvement to the multicast detector for caching the detection notification and

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX 1.2, remoting, and jmx-remoting commited to 3.2 branch

2004-01-03 Thread Jeff Haynie
Tom/Scott, The modules remoting and jmx-remoting weren't integrated into the main build and weren't being built into the main distribution. I fixed this and also setup the default detector/connectors to be automatically deployed as part of the default jboss-service.xml. I've committed this

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX 1.2, remoting, and jmx-remoting commited to 3.2 branch

2004-01-03 Thread Jeff Haynie
to be a seperate sar in deploy for easy removal if they are not wanted. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Saturday, January 03

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX 1.2, remoting, and jmx-remoting commited to 3.2 branch

2004-01-03 Thread Jeff Haynie
need to be a seperate sar in deploy for easy removal if they are not wanted. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Saturday

Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-858049 ] JBoss HTTP Signature

2003-12-10 Thread Jeff Haynie
It would be nice to be configurable as well. I.E. Apache Coyote/1.0 JBoss/3.2.3 OEM/ISV/1.0 Jeff - Original Message - From: SourceForge.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:31 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-858049 ] JBoss

Re: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes

2003-12-01 Thread Jeff Haynie
I thought we were using the doug lea's concurrent ThreadPool (PooledExecutor) in most places? - Original Message - From: Tom Elrod [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:04 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes I need a thread pool and

RE: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer

2003-06-17 Thread Jeff Haynie
JSR160 is partially implemented in HEAD and talks to Jboss Remoting API. It shouldn't be too much longer to have a full implementation working. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Taylor Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss remoting callbacks [was JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26]

2003-04-04 Thread Jeff Haynie
the other way like you had mentioned? Secondly, what is really going to be cool when we expose this via AOP remoting... Bill, what are your plans for that? Thanks, Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Haynie

RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26

2003-04-03 Thread Jeff Haynie
Jboss Remoting callbacks are in - I wil commit in the next day or so when tom and I finish testing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1

RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26

2003-04-03 Thread Jeff Haynie
... Bill, what are your plans for that? Thanks, Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26 Jboss Remoting callbacks

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-27 Thread Jeff Haynie
I'm not sure...The problem with Versioning and Remoting is that a proxy object is required. You have to return a different object than the one actually constructed. You getting me? I'm not sure if this can be done within bytecode manipulation. I'll have to ask the Javassist guys. Why?

RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Jeff Haynie
On IE6.0 on W2K, the drop downs on the front page, such as Forums...Development, doesn't do anything. However, if I click on Forums... It goes to the main forums page. Also, when I try and login, I get a Logging you in, hang tight! and the page never returns The IE globe spins to infinity

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Jeff Haynie
Bill, This is fabulous stuff. Good job. Is there a way we might be able to use the AOP xml to dynamically do your example below (as well as the clustered and remoting) for POJOs during construction time? In other words, could you not have an interceptor on a constructor pointcut that would do

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration

2003-03-26 Thread Jeff Haynie
JBoss Remoting is much more fabulous. We need to get the word out on it... I need to write some darn docs.. Too busy trying to get a new release out on our side. Not enough hours in a day. I totally agree. And yes, a constructor pointcut is the way to go. The only downside of constructor

[JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-20 Thread Jeff Haynie
Famous quote from Sun on News.com: http://news.com.com/2100-1013-993471.html?tag=fd_top 'Phipps said Wednesday that making the compliance test available will make it clear that Sun does not want to intentionally obstruct JBoss Group's efforts to gain J2EE compliance. However, Phipps said he

RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JBoss-3.2 build issues

2003-03-18 Thread Jeff Haynie
Compression level on the cvs server -z9 is the max -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Phelps Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JBoss-3.2 build issues I've never been able

RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP Clustering 1st iteration

2003-03-18 Thread Jeff Haynie
You're on fire! Go go Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:15 PM To: Jboss-Dev Subject: [JBoss-dev] AOP Clustering 1st iteration Again, either an AOP instrumented or non-AOP instrumented pojo

RE: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?

2003-03-09 Thread Jeff Haynie
There's a difference between build-time dependencies and run-time dependencies. To build the SOAP connector, it requires Axis to build remoting. However, during execution, if you don't have Axis on your classpath, it won't be available, and won't cause a run-time dependencies. The intent is

RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-08 Thread Jeff Haynie
No, this just allows remote jboss servers to be discovered by browsing the JNDI tree instead of multicast. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 7:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev]

RE: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?

2003-03-08 Thread Jeff Haynie
Tom did this the other day when he integrated the JNDI detector into remoting, but just for source build dependencies only. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

[JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jeff Haynie
Is there any reason we need to hardcode the jars that are included in the lib directory? (in org.jboss.Main) Can't we just put all the *.jars under root/lib into the class loader on boot? Jeff --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus,

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jeff Haynie
, March 8, 2003, at 05:02 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote: Ok, this makes sense .. can't we list even if remote using WebDav? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jeff Haynie
-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars Is jboss-cache required to boot the server? --jason On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:21 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote: Because bela's jboss-cache is in lib/ on the build, but not configured in Main. So, I had to chase that down a bit before looking at the source

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss remoting

2003-03-07 Thread Jeff Haynie
I'm working on this ... Should have something sometime soon. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss remoting I'm not sure if it so much of

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Error ..

2003-03-05 Thread Jeff Haynie
Add jboss-common-client.jar on your path -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hae loong chan Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: Error .. hi all, After deployed firstejb.jar successfully

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss remoting

2003-03-04 Thread Jeff Haynie
: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:32 AM To: Jboss-Dev Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss remoting Hey all, I can see why David was so excited about the new JBoss Remoting framework that Jeff Haynie and Tom Elrod wrote. I had dinner with Jeff in Boston last night and over a few beers he discussed in detail

RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development

2003-02-28 Thread Jeff Haynie
What's the reason to support JDK1.3 -- just asking, not against it. We've been using 1.4.1 for a good while now and it seems to be much better in performance and stability. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of danch Sent: Friday, February

RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development

2003-02-28 Thread Jeff Haynie
The problem really is with me - I fess up. Bill's mad because I broke the build twice this week by inadvertantly checking in code (throwing an exception that is the new overloaded version in 1.4) that only compiles on 1.4. Unfortunately, my whole work and home environment *DO* require 1.4 and

RE: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jeff Haynie
If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away. It's not free, but cheap and much more mature than Eclipse. I used Eclipse, but enjoy IntelliJ much more. (Not trying to start a holy war, just giving you another option to look at it you enjoy Eclipse...) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] Jboss-mx errors

2003-02-21 Thread Jeff Haynie
I'm getting a bunch of these errors while building fresh checkout of jboss-mx from HEAD. Anyone have any ideas? [execmodules] C:\cvs-jboss-head\jboss-mx\jmx\src\main\org\jboss\mx\metadata\JBossXMBean10.java:37: package org.dom4j does not exist[execmodules] import

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss-mx errors

2003-02-21 Thread Jeff Haynie
Title: Message OK, this is fixed. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff HaynieSent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:54 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss-mx errors i did a brand new checkout into

RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really bad

2003-02-21 Thread Jeff Haynie
I think AOP has a separate functional requirement from Remoting and should be separated. Remoting depends (potentially) on AOP. AOP should be the instrumenting, invocation and interception framework. Remoting should then add any semantics for transport and discovery. Individual subsystems

RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really bad

2003-02-21 Thread Jeff Haynie
Yes - but you guys don't seem to buy into it otherwise you won't be talking about where and how tx or remoting should go into AOP. Maybe I'm missing something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003

RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really bad

2003-02-21 Thread Jeff Haynie
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Haynie Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really bad Yes - but you guys don't seem to buy into it otherwise you

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Remoting Commit

2003-02-19 Thread Jeff Haynie
jencks On 2003.02.19 00:54 Jeff Haynie wrote: I commited the jboss-remoting code tonight. There is now a separate module named jboss-remoting, and it is aliased in jboss-mx and jboss-head (because mx needs it). It looks like all 3 modules are compiling fine. There is more work

RE: [JBoss-dev] jmx remoting + copyright in a jbossmx file

2003-02-18 Thread Jeff Haynie
Yes, this is my fault and will resolve. My IDE automatically puts those at the top of every new class and I have to remember to delete them and replace for JBOSS code. This code is part of JBOSS and not part of Vocalocity. I will remove ASAP. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Remoting Commit

2003-02-18 Thread Jeff Haynie
Title: Message I commited the jboss-remoting code tonight. There is now a separate module named jboss-remoting, and it is aliased in jboss-mx and jboss-head (because mx needs it). It looks like all 3 modules are compiling fine. There is more work that Tom and I are doing this week to try

RE: [JBoss-dev] ThreadPooling in JMX? Its broken

2003-01-16 Thread Jeff Haynie
Why don't we just create on enter and then clear thread locals in the finally of the run in the threadpool? If there's any thread local variables in the executing thread, they could then be set in the executing thread pool thread, and then the thread pool thread could remove them upon exiting?

RE: [JBoss-dev] ThreadPooling in JMX? Its broken

2003-01-16 Thread Jeff Haynie
What happens in the case the executing thread doesn't know he's executing on a thread pool thread - such as that another caller is calling a method on an object via a thread pool? In this case, you thread local variables wouldn't work -- in which case, thread locals are pointless, no?

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-668710 ] jboss.org vilolaties w3c-standards and doesn't render right

2003-01-15 Thread Jeff Haynie
Is this is JOKE? I think I'd prefer to spend my time on AOP / JB4. geez.. ... ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of SourceForge.net Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-668710 ]