RE: [JBoss-dev] Deployment directory for singleton services

2004-03-18 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
couldn't the deployer just pick up a tag from the descriptor -- rather than add yet another deployment directory? On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Adrian Brock wrote: On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 10:37, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: How about having a sub-directory farm/singleton instead? They serve different

RE: [JBoss-dev] lock errors on commit attempts

2003-06-20 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Definitely had password problems today. For a moment I thought I had forgotten mine or simply cannot type anymore.. -- Juha On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Scott, I've been seeing the same errors and it was not accepting my password sometimes. I was just persistent.

RE: [JBoss-dev] Oswego util.concurrent jar updated

2003-04-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
by the time they're through JSR..? On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Nathan Phelps wrote: Any chance they'll ever update the package name to get rid of the capital EDU... drives me crazy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent:

RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues

2003-03-31 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
works with 1.2.1 + w2k too The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original

Re: [JBoss-dev] XMBean and transient attributes

2003-03-29 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
it should set the value to -1 in the MBeanAttributeInfo descriptor if no getMethod fields are specified // if no method mapping, enable caching automatically if (getMethod == null currTimeLimit == null) descr.setField(CURRENCY_TIME_LIMIT, -1); -- Juha On Sat, 29

RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
It's not the new look that is bad (the red bar and the menu) its all the other stuff that blinks worse than your average porn site. An eyesore. Too much stuff that just bounces around. Looks is good, should continue to apply it to the rest of the stuff. Layout is bad, needs a complete redesign

RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
no I am saying rethink how you lay them out -- having them appear all over the place (top, bottom, several on both sides) like they are now doesn't look very good. its a layout issue, it sucks On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, marc fleury wrote: you are saying get rid of the ads? that is not going to

RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Jeff Haynie wrote: Also, when I try and login, I get a Logging you in, hang tight! and the page never returns The IE globe spins to infinity works for me, when the site is actually responding (IE6 + W2K) however, the remember me thingy doesnt work, probably something

RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
2003, marc fleury wrote: OK fine, be specific on where you would put them, marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha-P Lindfors Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding

RE: [JBoss-dev] Regarding JBoss site

2003-03-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
convert the main page text box titles to use same style as in menu and side bars. On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, marc fleury wrote: OK fine, be specific on where you would put them, marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha-P

Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
There's no requirement from JMX to use 1.4 yet. (excluding JSR160/Remoting) On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Scott M Stark wrote: Originally I said I thought we needed to keep 4.0 buildable by JDK 1.3, but I'm starting to think otherwise. I'm about to give in to this demand. If users cannot switch to JDK

RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework

2003-03-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Bill Burke wrote: 1. Source located in neutral territory, namely the common module. ok 2. Sequence of interceptors determined by (iterator in) invocation object. This could be a modifiable iterator at some point. This allows the interceptor stack to be modified per

Re: [JBoss-dev] MBeanProxy with JBoss Remoting

2003-02-19 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
yes On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Anatoly Akkerman wrote: Hi, I don't know if this is obvious and I am treading old ground or makes sense or not, but given that JMX remoting already works, if one creates a Java proxy to an MBean via MBeanProxy and that Proxy instance gets shipped through the

Re: [JBoss-dev] File Persistence and Crash

2002-12-10 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
FD.sync() all your writes... ? On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andy wrote: Does someone know how to implement a file based persistence that does not become corrupted except maybe when the file is written during a crash. --- This sf.net email is

[JBoss-dev] Problem compiling 3.2 beta testsuite

2002-11-10 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Can't get 3.2 testsuite to compile due to the errors below compile-classes-only: [javac] Compiling 932 source files to C:\work\mletpatch\HEAD\jboss3.2beta\testsuite\output\classes [execmodules]

Re: [JBoss-dev] How is Constructor Info used?

2002-10-08 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote: When I first saw XMBean XML, I assumed that constructor/ referred to the constructor for the resource (model object). On a closer look, it appears that this information (ModelMBeanConstructorInfo) refers only to the constructor for the MB itself. it

[JBoss-dev] Build testsuite

2002-10-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
does the testsuite work yet or is this still work in progress? I can't get it to run from either /build or /testsuite $ ./build.bat run-basic-testsuite Calling ..\tools\bin\ant.bat -logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger run-basic-testsu ite Buildfile: build.xml _buildmagic:init: Trying

Re: [JBoss-dev] Build testsuite

2002-10-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
cool, thanks On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Scott M Stark wrote: Its fixed now. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Juha-P Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday

Re: [JBoss-dev] Build testsuite

2002-10-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
although I'm not having much success running 'tests-unit' on HEAD... I seem to get a few infinite loops from log4j that eventually die to stack overflows and a test success rate of only about 44% anyone else having better luck with it? On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Juha-P Lindfors wrote: cool

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-04 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote: Hello, And what about deployment order? wouldn't the order be explicit if the registry stores a script-like file of its changes and then reads it at startup? similar to how a db constructs itself from a tx log -- Juha

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote: Juha, what you need to persist from the registry is the information to recreate the mbeans OK. Great. Sorry for the confusion. I think this information is essentially the MBeanInfo, the object name, and possibly, a dependency indicator (MB foo

Re: [JBoss-dev] EJB's as Xmbeans?

2002-10-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
all that is needed is init, start, stop, destroy On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, David Jencks wrote: proposed mbean interceptor: create start stop destroy setMBeanInvoker //not sure of name, this is like setContainer. getNext insert or setNext invoke Now, this is an mbean stack, so there needs

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote: all of mbeaninfo should not be always stored. for instance, if I instantiate my MMB by using a definition from an URL or db then the mbeaninfo is already persisted there and should not be duplicated (only the ref to where to locate it is needed). This

Re: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, David Jencks wrote: The location does not have to be accessible after deployment, so the mbean persistence mechanism has to store it itself. why wouldn't it be accessible? and if my persistence mechanism is something like Dain's CMP engine, I don't expect it to store the

Re: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-02 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, David Jencks wrote: For making it work in the short term perhaps only persisting mbeans with a particular descriptor will be the best plan, you can set this descriptor for your dynamically created mbeans now, and we can set it for all the others later. yes, agreed, add a

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-02 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote: Perhaps we're using 'persist' differently. The mbean registry contains object references to all of the mbeans in the server.To me, persisting the registry (or a part of it), means serializing those objects completely (MB info + data). no, the

RE: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-10-01 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
do you have operation info for the operation names you are mapping to (setId getId)? On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote: Juha Group, make sure you add the getMethod and setMethod mapping to your MMB attributes. Thanks. I did this and started re-reading your JMX book. I now have a

Re: [JBoss-dev] creating persistent MBeans dynamically

2002-09-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
make the mbean registry persistent (it's already an mbean) triggering store() on registerMBean() calls, and have your widget factory register mbeans using the registry mbean operation registerMBean(Object, ObjectName, Map) where you pass in the valueMap the additional info to store for

[JBoss-dev] Ant java fork fails to exit

2002-09-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Anyone else see this problem or have a workaround for it? Using JDK1.4, running java task with fork=true fails to exit the VM sometimes (more often than not). ie the execution hangs forever waiting. Ant version is whatever we're using. -- Juha

Re: [JBoss-dev] Ant java fork fails to exit

2002-09-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
nevermind.. On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Juha-P Lindfors wrote: Anyone else see this problem or have a workaround for it? Using JDK1.4, running java task with fork=true fails to exit the VM sometimes (more often than not). ie the execution hangs forever waiting. Ant version is whatever we're

Re: [JBoss-dev] Build System... any ideas

2002-09-19 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
jbossmx already has its own module specific test suite rather than integrating with the jboss testsuite module so I would welcome the change jason suggests where jboss testsuite integrates tests from individual modules if they exist -- Juha On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, David Jencks wrote: They'd

[JBoss-dev] RE: [jboss-cvs] jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/persistenceObjectStreamPersistenceManager.java OsPersistMgr.java

2002-09-17 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
I use jEdit 4.0 final with the latest JavaStyle plugin from the plugin central. Seems to work (and the JavaStyle plugin has gone a long way since the last version I used). I entered the parameters in the plugin GUI by hand. I assume it stores the config somewhere I'll check if I can find the

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Scott M Stark wrote: This probably breaks the MLet processing. But then I think it was already broken, MLets are URLClassLoaders not UCLs. actually we detect ULR in the mlet code and register one UCL per URL in case ULR is used... -- Juha

Re: [JBoss-dev] code submission

2002-07-17 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
diff posted to SF tracker or you can ask marcf for rw if you feel like fixing more bugs -- Juha On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Seth Sites wrote: I have a patch for bug [ 564890 ] JMS recover/redelivery errors that I have tested and am ready to submit for review. I just have a few questions. 1)

Re: [JBoss-dev] Viewing mbean operation results

2002-06-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Scott M Stark wrote: I thought 'presentationString' only applied to model mbeans. How can we integrate the presentation metadata into the existing standard and dynamic mbeans? You can't, as neither one defines a way to extend the metadata. -- Juha

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX: Adding Model MBean database persistence

2002-06-26 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Paul Ward wrote: I am currently in the process of creating an XMBean descendant and PersistenceManager implementation We don't need an XMBean descendant, just the PM implementation. Is there any interest in having this added to the JBoss head? Yes. If so, does

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX: Adding Model MBean database persistence

2002-06-26 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Paul Ward wrote: Why I had to create an XMBean descendant: First, XMBean's link to the PM interface is through the instance created in the static initializer for the ModelMBeanInvoker class. This class is hard coded to use the NullPersistence class as it's PM. True,

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX: Adding Model MBean database persistence

2002-06-26 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, David Jencks wrote: This may work fine for packages deployed by a deploymentScanner, but will work less well for packages deployed by directly calling MainDeployer.deploy. Scanning for packages may not be the most useful deployment method... even though right now it is

Re: [JBoss-dev] Viewing mbean operation results

2002-06-26 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
yes, see the 'presentationString' descriptor field in the spec that's where I'd put the model, then have your console render the view -- Juha On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Scott M Stark wrote: So I'm testing the new htmladaptor for the upcoming release and some of the default String

Re: [JBoss-dev] Detected JMX bug??

2002-06-11 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
You can safely ignore that message. -- Juha On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Ram Ramesh wrote: Hi all, Is this a JMX bug? or is it a configuration issue? --Ram --- [09:43:45,208,ConfigurationService] Deployers set to

RE: [JBoss-dev] Problem with UCL.equals and Proxies

2002-05-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
this will break the classes we generate in memory though, as they do not have an url On Mon, 27 May 2002, marc fleury wrote: |The result is that UnifiedClassLoader can't override equals. To validate On the top of my head (but I don't remember too well these days) this wouldn't break stuff

RE: [JBoss-dev] Problem with UCL.equals and Proxies

2002-05-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
ignore, I misunderstood your message On Tue, 28 May 2002, Juha-P Lindfors wrote: this will break the classes we generate in memory though, as they do not have an url On Mon, 27 May 2002, marc fleury wrote: |The result is that UnifiedClassLoader can't override equals. To validate

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developersenvironment

2002-05-21 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Dain Sundstrom wrote: [I moved this to the dev list] I think the real power of JMX is you can have disparate components that can all talk to a central object without becoming tightly coupled. Here is my idea: We have an optional port server MBean. Before a service

Re: [JBoss-dev] ejb-name conflict, help me!!!

2002-05-02 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Andreas Schaefer wrote: I guess that JBossMX does not provide a fix for that, correct ? no because an object name like that is not spec compliant -- Juha ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for

Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] Dropping the System.out calls in the jmx code

2002-05-02 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
.. aaand make the logger interface available as an mbean in JMImplementation so my third party service impl can flash that red light too via the jmx bus -- Juha On Thu, 2 May 2002, Adrian Brock wrote: This is what I am trying to do with the JBossMX logger. You have a single logging

Re: [JBoss-dev] [JL] Is it time for a new enterprise solution?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
XML is now the lingua franca of human-readable structured data. XHTML, JSTL, Ant configs, SOAP, etc., mean that any serious designer of web applications must be proficient in reading and writing XML. Saying unreadable XML in the 21st century is like saying unreadable French in the 18th

Re: [JBoss-dev] [JL] Is it time for a new enterprise solution?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Michael Robinson wrote: Someone who was literate in XML, but with no prior exposure to the syntax and semantics of Java, could get more meaning out of the XML version than the Java version. Really? To me both would look like nonsense. that language will be more concise

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why is new ObjectName() so slow?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
because an object name contains a set of properties that need to be parsed and may also be a pattern which needs to be determined the current implementation does this eagerly at object name creation time -- Juha On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: ok, I know I asked already and I

RE: [JBoss-dev] Why is new ObjectName() so slow?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: |because an object name contains a set of properties that need to be |parsed and may also be a pattern which needs to be determined right the value=name pairs |the current implementation does this eagerly at object name creation |time can we do

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why is new ObjectName() so slow?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Hiram Chirino wrote: Using a set of properties to identify an object just seems werid to me. yes. it's not just wierd, its clearly a poor design choice in this case. the object name is used as an identifier and therefore needed for lookup. overloading the identifier to

RE: [JBoss-dev] Why is new ObjectName() so slow?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: Juha for example. By spec must we have Domain1:name1=value1;name2=value2 == Domain1:name2=value2;name1=value1 ??? I would imagine so, yes and this is the problem for performance -- Juha ___

RE: [JBoss-dev] Why is new ObjectName() so slow?

2002-04-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: 2 solutions. 1- I build a mapper that takes String and returns ObjectName 2- you build a ObjectName implementation that caches the ObjectName and returns the right Object if you pass me exactly the same String. Come to think of it we probably need

RE: [JBoss-dev] [JL] Is it time for a new enterprise solution?

2002-04-26 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: One step at a time, when we finalize 3.x releases i.e. in a couple of weeks, I say we move on 4.0 development and the overhaul of the admin with persistence through the modelmbeans will require some tweaking of the XMBeans (I believe the current

[JBoss-dev] [JL] Is it time for a new enterprise solution?

2002-04-25 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Critique on JBoss configuration. http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jsp?forum=61thread=3254 -- Juha ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

RE: WTF??? was RE: [JBoss-dev] SAR... Sucky ARchive ?

2002-04-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, marc fleury wrote: *and unreadable XML* oh my -- Juha just tired of it all, marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry |Sanderson |Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:10 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] Final 3.0 beta will happen this week

2002-04-11 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Luke Taylor wrote: Scott M Stark wrote: Its all junk as far as I'm concerned. If nobody claims maintence they are history. Is the stuff in the admin directory actually used at all either? nope. -- Juha ___

[JBoss-dev] Re: AW: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]Thr ead deadlock in class loader

2002-04-11 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Anyone knows how this works? Will they publish the thing not until it reviewed, or what? yeah they'll review it to see if it makes sense, and then assign a bug id for it at which point you usually get an email about it -- Juha

[JBoss-dev] Re: Scheduled MBeans (Suggested Patch)

2002-04-09 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
looking at the code, I think the timer should override the sendNotification() to use multiple threads to call listener handleNotification() methods (threadpool if it seems creating new Threads per listener call won't perform, which is likely) however the default behavior in the

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JMX HTML... From the Pure Fluff Department...

2002-04-08 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, David Jencks wrote: Look into the modelmbean descriptors. I think they include a priority as a standard descriptor, this could be used to determine whether to display something. visibility to determine the granularity of mbeans (spec defines levels 1-4)

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX - Core/Kernel

2002-03-24 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Adrian Brock wrote: If we really wanted to provide a minimal kernel, Standard and ModelMBeans are really services on top of the DynamicMBean core. But that's probably not relevent to most users of JMX The Model MBean implementation should at least eventually move out of

[JBoss-dev] JBossMX 1.0 Beta Release

2002-03-14 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
You can download it from sourceforge http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/JBossMX-1_0_Beta.tgz http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/JBossMX-1_0_Beta.zip This beta release includes the JMX 1.0 specified functionality -- all standard services: MLet, Monitoring, Relation and Timer

[JBoss-dev] Re: Jboss-development digest, Vol 1 #2686 - 13 msgs

2002-01-28 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Hmm ok... it's a TODO for the next volunteer ;-) -- Juha --__--__-- Message: 9 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:44:04 -0500 From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance/server ServerSUITE.java I haven't had a

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx build.xml

2001-12-12 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
huh? On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: Why don't these have vendor directories? --jason ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX and jboss-all

2001-12-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
That's up to bill and sacha.. but I think you're right, moving might be more trouble than its worth -- Juha On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: What is the deal with the cluster stuff? It is currently in jbossmx module in cvs. It should be moved, but moving it will break all jboss-all

Re: [JBoss-dev] Versioning? (Was: current mbean structure confusing)

2001-12-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Andrew Scherpbier wrote: While reading the thread current mbean structure confusing I was thinking about some other issues with mbeans, specifically versioning. In the special purpose app server we developed at my previous company we ran into a problem with upgrades.

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX and jboss-all

2001-12-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
hmm? did I drop my module in the wrong place in the CVS? -- Juha On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:45:57 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX and jboss-all come to think of it, users will

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMX and jboss-all

2001-12-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Is there a way to co and build a standalone jbossmx? that should be possible, can it be done the way MQ uses CVS now? -- Juha On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:25:43 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx build.bat build.sh build.xml

2001-12-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Thanks for this work, Jason. -- Juha On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 16:33:20 -0800 From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx build.bat build.sh build.xml User: user57 Date: 01/12/06 16:33:20

Re: [JBoss-dev] ANN JBossMX a JMX implementation in JBoss

2001-12-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
And for those of you who want to place preorders for the book: Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0672322889/104-6670791-7933546 BarnesNoble http://shop.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=6AWE6O0GSLmscssid=P8DUDFK1W30T9P49N6M7UG91HXC87KN1isbn=0672322889 Hope you

Re: [JBoss-dev] ANN JBossMX a JMX implementation in JBoss

2001-12-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Hi, end of January, 2002 I don't have an exact date -- Juha On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Dave Bettin wrote: Is there an official publication date for the book?? Thanks, Dave --- Juha-P Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for those of you who want to place preorders for the book

Re: [JBoss-dev] Subclassing of Remote Interface

2001-12-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Is it an exception from the container or from the verifier? -- Juha On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Andreas Schaefer wrote: Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:35:51 -0800 From: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] Subclassing of Remote Interface Hi Geeks I ran into

RE: [JBoss-dev] ANN JBossMX a JMX implementation in JBoss

2001-12-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
he signed the contracts On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Bill Burke wrote: Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:35:26 -0500 From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ANN JBossMX a JMX

RE: [JBoss-dev] ANN JBossMX a JMX implementation in JBoss

2001-12-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
and its being fixed :) On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Bill Burke wrote: Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:35:26 -0500 From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ANN JBossMX a JMX

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS DEV LIST AND ***FORUM*** USAGE

2001-12-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: ONE REQUEST FOR THE USERS OF EMAILS PLEASE DO NOT OVERQUOTE *** and one request for the users of forum: do quote (not over quote), otherwise your messages make very little sense when read from the mailing list -- Juha

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/loadingBasicLoaderRepository.java LoaderRepository.java

2001-12-03 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
you're right, thanks -- Juha On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, David Jencks wrote: Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:15:34 -0500 From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Juha Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/loading

Re: [JBoss-dev] RequiredModelMBean.java? / general rantings

2001-12-02 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Hi, Marc / everyone, When you asked about this Dynamic mbean thing I'm working on, were you thinking of me applying it to RequiredModelMBean? I wrote a ModelMBean implementation for the book and will commit an implementation based on it (with some other stuff) in the next couple of days.

RE: [JBoss-dev] [research] a home/remote generator

2001-11-12 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, marc fleury wrote: |It is very similar to GLUE |(http://www.themindelectric.com/products/glue/glue.html). there you go, let's do it then... the problem with glue is we can't distribute the lib with jboss it will require each user to go and download it individually --

RE: [JBoss-dev] [research] a home/remote generator

2001-11-12 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, marc fleury wrote: |the problem with glue is we can't distribute the lib with jboss |it will require each user to go and download it individually ok let's stop this, who said we wanted to distribute the libraries from glue? I would want to, cause its a very good lib.

Re: [JBoss-dev] RH, Jetty, testsuite, Exceptions...

2001-09-17 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Hmm.. you sure the auth.conf file is available in your classpath for the client? -- Juha On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Julian Gosnell wrote: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:49:05 +0100 From: Julian Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [JBoss-dev] requirements for build

2001-08-31 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Dan - Blue Lotus Software wrote: I'm sorry if this is obvious to everyone on this list. It wasn't for me, though. The directions for buildmagic say nothing about how to *install* it. And the build script contains the record tag, which is only supported in v1.4beta1

Re: [JBoss-dev] *.kpx files

2001-08-27 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: Does anyone still use these? What are they for? Kawa IDE Project Files. Don't really belong to the CVS. -- Juha ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] jbossmq selector parser grammer source

2001-08-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
it in. Regards, Hiram From: Juha-P Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jbossmq selector parser grammer source Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:01:02 +0300 (EET DST) I have just fixed (and verified) both of these problems. Should I

Re: [JBoss-dev] jbossmq selector parser grammer source

2001-08-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: Do you know what is used to generate parser.java from jms.y? //### This file created by BYACC 1.8(/Java extension 0.92) //### Java capabilities added 7 Jan 97, Bob Jamison //### Updated : 27 Nov 97 -- Bob Jamison, Joe Nieten //### 01 Jan

Re: [JBoss-dev] jbossmq selector parser grammer source

2001-08-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
. It needs to check for true and false too. Do you know what is used to generate parser.java from jms.y? --jason On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Juha-P Lindfors wrote: It's here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jboss/spyderMQ/src/java/org/spydermq/selectors

RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML

2001-08-16 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Dan - Blue Lotus Software wrote: My opinion of it back 5 months ago was that it was not really even close to usable yet. Have things changed radically since then? Well, I think the emergence of UDDI/WSDL gave them a boost to speed up, and all the core specs seem to

RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML

2001-08-15 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, marc fleury wrote: |Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP? Or is it more? yes but not everybody lives in the we see technology for what it really is sphere. And I would like to state for the record that just because it is XML doesn't necessarily mean its

Re: [JBoss-dev] how do i

2001-07-19 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
At the end of the page: To change your subscription (set options like digest and delivery modes, get a reminder of your password, or unsubscribe from Jboss-development), enter your subscription email address: Follow the link :p -- Juha On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Mail Delivery Status Notification

2001-07-10 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
I just togged nomail on him. -- Juha On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote: How long before this guy gets wacked from the list? - Original Message - From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Mail

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java

2001-06-16 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
umm... binary file? -497 lines? you sure? -- Juha On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: User: schaefera Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java Log: Added the support for classes

RE: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date

2001-06-15 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
We're not making a new FINAL release on Monday, it's a feature freeze for 2.4 BETA. AFAIK, Monday is still ok. -- Juha On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Vincent Harcq wrote: Hi, IMHO, the re-deployment problem (see below) should stop you making a new release. For my part, I will test/validate the

Re: [JBoss-dev] RabbitHole branch created

2001-06-12 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
hi, why a branch? It's easier to work on the main trunk and since most development effort is going into 3.0 let's just freeze 2.4, branch the 2.4, release 2.4 BETA and fix 2.4 issues in the branch. Keep main development in the trunk. -- Juha On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Scott M Stark wrote: I

Re: [JBoss-dev] Verifier Patch

2001-06-07 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
6.10.5 Session beans' remote interface 9.2.7 Entity bean's remote interface ? -- Juha On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, K.V. Vinay Menon wrote: Juha, For the verifier fix what on earth is the spec id .. 9..2.x.x? Any pointers would be much appreciated. Can check in the source once I get the

[JBoss-dev] [ADMIN] Test

2001-06-06 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
spam warning test ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] EJB 2.0 DTD LocalResolver

2001-06-04 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
go ahead.. -- Juha On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Vincent Harcq wrote: Hi, Does it bother anybody if I add a LocalResolver of DTD for //Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN to a local version of http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd ? Vincent.

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMSContainerInvoker.java

2001-06-01 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Peter Antman wrote: You see what will happen? Yes, the client will send its messages to one topic (no automatic creation here), and the MDB will listen on ANOTHER topic, namely a to the system unknown destination, since it was not correctly spelled. What do you other

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMSContainerInvoker.java

2001-06-01 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Ferguson, Doug wrote: It will be trial to remove the topic/queue at undeployment, if and only if I added it at deploy time ok.. We already display a message at deploytime that says that the queue/topic doesn't exist. So it isn't really correct that the server

Re: [JBoss-dev] ConfigurationService buggy

2001-05-07 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Mon, 7 May 2001, marc fleury wrote: Juha, when we were in London, debugged that to work the right way so we could demo how the remote installation worked. Juju, do you have that fix in mind still? care to put it in? I think Vinay committed the fix on Saturday. Not sure all the cases

Re: [JBoss-dev] RFC: Add isolation level attribute in jboss.xml orjaws.xml?

2001-05-05 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Yes, please go ahead and implement this -- Juha On Sat, 5 May 2001, danch wrote: Does anyone have opinions on whether this would be a good feature or not? The 1.1 spec does not specify how isolation levels should be handled, except for BMT session beans, and by saying/implying that beans

[JBoss-dev] NamingAlias: won't compile

2001-04-22 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
Scott, the current CVS checkout won't compile because ServiceMBean interface is missing STARTING and STARTED variables which are required by the NamingAlias class. -- Juha ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS client/ssh

2001-04-11 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Peter Braswell wrote: I'm using a W2K machine. I've tried jCVS (no support for ssh), winCVS (seems to support ssh, but won't work properly) and cygwin's command line CVS from within the Unix shell. Nothing seems to work. Cygwin pretty much works out of the box for me

  1   2   >