Emerson,
The JMX-HTML Adaptor MBean (from Sun jmxtools.jar) does not allow the
specification of a bind address - only a port, and max # of clients. There
is no attribute for it, and in fact, the server socket open call uses the
no-address constructor (port,backlog). That said, I thought someone
Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Mike Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss in a multi developers
environment
Emerson,
The JMX-HTML Adaptor MBean (from
coming on the ServiceBindingManager?
-dain
Mike Finn wrote:
Scott, Does the 'server name' (server identity) need to be part of
the getPort request, if it is spec'd in the svc bind mbean
config? if the server name was set on the mbean, then the port maps
could be keyed off that (in addition
in a multi developers
environment
Great. Submit it as a patch and we'll figure out where to put it in the
source tree.
As for JDOM, I thought we already used it, but I don't pay much
attention to the JMX stuff.
-dain
Mike Finn wrote:
Dain,
Coming well. Work just keeps getting in the way
Jonathan,
Either HTTP or JMX-HTML adaptor is causing the address in use error.
If you are talking about 3.0 (you didn't specify - tisk, tisk :-) ), those
config files are not in conf. You will need to update the
META-INF/jboss-service.xml in these sars, with the desired ports:
jetty-plugin.sar
.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (502) 583-3730
-Original Message-
From: Mike Finn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Running JBoss on multiple IP addresses
Jonathan,
Either HTTP or JMX-HTML adaptor is causing
Scott,
Does the 'server name' (server identity) need to be part of the getPort request, if
it is spec'd in the svc bind mbean config? if the server name was set on the mbean,
then the port maps could be keyed off that (in addition to service name). So, the
request for getport could assume the
They are so cute when they try to convince the world their platforms are
more secure
I thought I'd share my favorites:
I've never seen a systematic study that showed open source to be more
secure, said Dorothy Denning, a professor of computer science at Georgetown
University who specializes
Very basic question, but I have to ask it: how should the service bindings
service be exposed? I assume as MBean? MBean with static port manager
bound in JNDI (might have the chicken/egg problem here, since JNDI would be
a dependency and JNDI would need to find what port on which to run...)?
I had been working on an alternative solution to this problem (see earlier thread in
Mid-April: Multiple Instances). After some thought and work, this (Dain's) seems
more robust (at least to me). The other way was effectively a proxy server sitting on
a single (known) port, directing streams
I will *gladly* volunteer to help out. I know the network stuff pretty well, and with
a little help here and there (with the JBoss internal stuff) can put together a
solution. Let me know what I can do.
#mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
is looking into this. I wish I had more time to review
what
is going on here add input, but I am loaded with tasks at the moment.
From
my brief overviews of your emails, look like you are on the case.
--jason
Quoting Mike Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You guys probably have more to worry about right
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleurySent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:38 PMTo: Mike
Finn; Jboss-Development-ListSubject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple
Instance - continued
we
care, revive the thread if you can, better submit configuration that would
work with "
You guys
probably have more to worry about right now, with RC1 and all,
but:
A while
back there was a thread regarding the whole 'multiple instance detection' thing
- where the problem of managing multiple listeners vying for the same port was
discussed (JNDI, RMI, etc).
Was there
any
14 matches
Mail list logo
