On Nov 26, 2003, at 3:57 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Yes, but in EJB QL/JBOSS QL you can only select one item, so group by
I forgot to add a unique primary key to the example below. Which is
what you typically select on.
Anyway, if you think GROUP BY is useless, how would I do the
On Nov 26, 2003, at 5:13 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Hopefully our future integration of CMP on top of Hibernate will
provide this sort of solution. But, if you want to do this work, we
would be really happy to have it!
I just put it in JBoss 3.2.2. Where do I submit a diff?
On Nov 26, 2003, at 6:26 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Excuse me, what have you put in 3.2? Bill wrote about CMP on top of
You can submit a patch on sourceforge.net.
Oh. I have a patch that adds GROUP BY to jbossql. It follows the
On Nov 25, 2003, at 10:33 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Unfortunately EJB QL only allows 1 item in the select statement so no
GROUP BY. Use Hibernate.
Even then GROUP BY on one table is useful. For example to change this:
UserId LocationId LastLoginDate
1 1 2003-01-01
Is the JBoss group going to add 'official' support for Hibernate to
JBoss? I mean to bundle it in a .sar, integrate Hibernate Session
management into the EJB container? All the stuff that is badly
documented right now :-)
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:19 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
You are misusing GROUP BY here.
What would you like to get in the result?
How does ORDER BY work here?
GROUP BY is intended to be used with statistical functions. To get the
result you wrote, I would write the query this way:
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:58 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
We have Hibernate support both development and production if you want
it. We just haven't put up the marketing material, if that's what you
Gavin is working on a SAR and a Deployer for Hibernate. If you're
interested in helping him with
I noticed that there is no GROUP BY in JBoss-QL. Is that for a reason?
Looking at the source of the EJB-QL compiler, is this something that
can be added by using the ORDER BY code? The two are probably roughly
Heya. I'm at the WWDC and we all got a set of CDs with a prerelease
version of Panther (OS X 10.3) and new developer tools. On the tools CD
there is a package called 'JavaApplicationServersDev' and it guess what
... it contains JBoss 3.2 (together with XDoclet and project templates
for the new
On Wednesday, Apr 9, 2003, at 10:22 Europe/Amsterdam, Jung , Dr.
- In the EJBDocletTask, you may process
- any session beans attributed with @jboss-net:web-service
urn=service-name scope=scope expose-all=true|false
processEntities=true|false, their methods being
On Thursday, Mar 27, 2003, at 18:25 Europe/Amsterdam, Bill Burke wrote:
We've been trying hard to keep the development forums as the base of
discussions. There's a lot of good information there.
The information there is good, but it is a pain to access the forums.
Here are some of the
On Thursday, Mar 27, 2003, at 03:28 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury wrote:
So in the quest to impove J2EE have you killed it?
bla bla bla bla
marc fleury wrote:
do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is?
obviously some of you don't get it, give it time, it will become very
It would be
On Saturday, Mar 22, 2003, at 23:03 Europe/Amsterdam, Tom Coleman wrote:
Personally, certification is irrelevant to me. My criteria is whether
or not the product gets the job done. I think certification serves to
answer that question for people who don't know how to figure it out
I noticed that 3.2.0 now includes a commons-httpclient.jar in
$JBOSS_HOME/lib. Shouldn't this be in the .sar that actually uses this
library? The problem is that I also use http-commons.jar in my own
project and because the JBoss provided one is in $JBOSS_HOME/lib, it is
always found first.
On Tuesday, Jan 21, 2003, at 22:18 Europe/Amsterdam, Scott M Stark
I'm doing a 3.0.6 release this weekend so make sure anything you
the 3.0 branch is tested and stable before then.
I see that this release is available from sourceforge now. However, the
I was thinking about something while looking at my application's
database behaviour... in many cases it is very inefficient to use a
finder method together with remove() for large collections. It would be
so much more efficient to have something like
public int deleteByCode(int code);
I think I have found a serious bug in the code where beans are not
correctly recycled. However, I do not know/understand all the details
of how this is implemented in JBoss, so I would like to ask this to the
person responsible for the MDB container to take a look at this.
My test case is very
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 09:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The is completely off topic... Does anyone know how to completely
disable underlined text in vim? I recently switched to OS X and the
vim now underlines key words (and other crap)... it is driving me nuts.
On Wednesday, Nov 27, 2002, at 17:20 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury
I just saw this QDox
It could really help us to read the data from the source files. It
that there is even a small AOP framework built on it (Nanning). Guys
is time to
On Tuesday, Nov 26, 2002, at 03:40 Europe/Amsterdam, Dain Sundstrom
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:08 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
I'd kill to have more test cases and especially performance test
cases. I would love to have tests the spit out a XML file with
timings. Then we
On Saturday, Nov 23, 2002, at 19:55 Europe/Amsterdam, Dain wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
Dain, what you need is more real use-cases. This is really basic
stuff which is used in most applications today. I'll be happy to
provide you with more
PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Monday, Nov 18, 2002, at 18:23 Europe/Amsterdam, Dain wrote:
This has already been solved in 3.2 and 4.0. I think that the patch
has been applied to 3.0.4, but I'm not sure, as someone else did the
back port. If you are seeing this behavior in 3.0.4 try Branch_3_0
Is there a release plan for 3.2 final? I don't see much traffic about
that on this list, how is release coordinated between the most active
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 18:20 Europe/Amsterdam, Dain wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:53 AM, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
In the case of OS X, it was an acknowledged bug that is now fixed.
Do I have to use 1.4 or do they have it fixed in a 1.3 version?
I'm using the DP5 1.4.1
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 23:40 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury wrote:
most of the development has been taken to the *private* jboss-group
list. However we are bringing this development back on the forums
Marc, that sounds really good! Even if we are not 'allowed' to join the
Mail list logo