Re: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer
Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Luke, In head, the plan is to use jsr160 and the MBeanServerConnection interface from jmx1.2 OK, thanks Adrian. I'll have a look at that. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer
Hi Luke, In head, the plan is to use jsr160 and the MBeanServerConnection interface from jmx1.2 Regards, Adrian Adrian Brock Director of Support Back Office JBoss Group, LLC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Taylor Sent: 17 June 2003 18:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer Luke Taylor wrote: I noticed that the management package is being built against a different version of the RemoteMBeanServer interface than the one in the main codebase (there's a separate jar in the tools directory). There's a comment in the build file saying that this is because RemoteMBeanServer is not available in the JBossMX project yet. Trying to build against the actual class causes a compilation error because the instantiate methods from MBeanServer aren't implemented by the LocalConnector inner class of ManagementBean. Would it be OK to add these so it compiles against the server module? On closer inspection, it seems that the current RemoteMBeanServer now extends MBeanServer (unlike the version that is being compiled against), so a better option would sbe to change the connector instance in ManagementBean to an MBeanServer and remove the whole LocalConnector inner class and the extra unnecessary delegation (and 250 lines of code). Any objections? -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer
Yes. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Luke Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JBoss Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:48 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer I noticed that the management package is being built against a different version of the RemoteMBeanServer interface than the one in the main codebase (there's a separate jar in the tools directory). There's a comment in the build file saying that this is because RemoteMBeanServer is not available in the JBossMX project yet. Trying to build against the actual class causes a compilation error because the instantiate methods from MBeanServer aren't implemented by the LocalConnector inner class of ManagementBean. Would it be OK to add these so it compiles against the server module? Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer
Luke Taylor wrote: Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Luke, In head, the plan is to use jsr160 and the MBeanServerConnection interface from jmx1.2 OK, thanks Adrian. I'll have a look at that. I've used an MBeanServer instance for the time being 'cos that compiles OK and I'm not sure exactly what the future plans are. Otherwise I'd have to put in lots of catch blocks for IOExceptions which the connection interface throws. Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer
Luke Taylor wrote: Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Luke, In head, the plan is to use jsr160 and the MBeanServerConnection interface from jmx1.2 OK, thanks Adrian. I'll have a look at that. I've used an MBeanServer instance for the time being 'cos that compiles OK and I'm not sure exactly what the future plans are. Otherwise I'd have to put in lots of catch blocks for IOExceptions which the connection interface throws. Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer
JSR160 is partially implemented in HEAD and talks to Jboss Remoting API. It shouldn't be too much longer to have a full implementation working. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Taylor Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ManagementBean and RemoteMbeanServer Luke Taylor wrote: Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Luke, In head, the plan is to use jsr160 and the MBeanServerConnection interface from jmx1.2 OK, thanks Adrian. I'll have a look at that. I've used an MBeanServer instance for the time being 'cos that compiles OK and I'm not sure exactly what the future plans are. Otherwise I'd have to put in lots of catch blocks for IOExceptions which the connection interface throws. Luke. -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
