[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-660405 ] ServiceController.create( ObjectName, Collectio
Bugs item #660405, was opened at 2002-12-31 15:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=660405group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Corby (corby) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: ServiceController.create( ObjectName, Collectio Initial Comment: SHORT VERSION: If I set my user MBeans to be dependent on the LocalTxConnectionManager, I can no longer successfully recycle my connection pool. LONG VERSION: (I am running JBoss 3.0.4, JDK 1.4.1_01, Win2K) I am using an MBean configuration file, sybase- service.xml, which is laid out almost identically to the hsqldb-service.xml file. It contains a LocalTxCM MBean, which is dependent on a LocalTxDS MBean and a LocalTXPool MBean. Normally, if I touch sybase-service.xml everything works great. ServiceController.install() is called with LocalTxCM, LocalTxDS, and LocalTxPool. ServiceController.create() is called with LocalTxCM, but it waits because the iDependOn beans haven't been created yet. After LocalTxPool is created, we iterate through the dependsOnMe mbeans and the LocalTxCM MBean is created. All is good. But if I introduce my own MBeans that are dependent on the database connection pool, then the ServiceController.create() method behaves differently. I use the following tag in my user MBeans: dependsjboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=sybaseD S/depends Now I can start the JBoss server just fine. But if I recycle the connection pool, here is what happens: ServiceController.install() is called just as before. The ServiceContexts for all three MBeans look fine. In particular, the iDependOn and the dependsOnMe lists are correct, and my userMBeans have been added to the dependsOnMe list for LocalTxCM. When ServiceController.create() method is called on LocalTxCM, it defers again. When ServiceController.create() is called on the other two MBeans, it seems to succeed. The create() methods are successfully executed on these MBeans. Thanks to dependsOnMe, ServiceController.create() is called on LocalTxCM again. But now when we get the ServiceContexts in the iDependOn list for LocalTxCM, they are all defined as state: NOTYETINSTALLED. So LocalTxCM still fails to create because it believes its dependent MBeans have not yet been created. This leads to the predictable log message: ERROR [URLDeploymentScanner] MBeanException: Exception in MBean operation 'checkIncompleteDeployments()' Cause: Incomplete Deployment listing: Packages waiting for a deployer: none Incompletely deployed packages: none MBeans waiting for classes: none MBeans waiting for other MBeans: ... ObjectName: jboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=sybaseDS state: CONFIGURED I Depend On: jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=LocalTxPool,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=CachedConnectionManager jboss.security:service=JaasSecurityManager jboss.jca:service=RARDeployer jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=LocalTxPool,name=sybaseDS Depends On Me: (My User MBeans) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=660405group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-660405 ] ServiceController.create( ObjectName, Collectio
Bugs item #660405, was opened at 2002-12-31 15:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=660405group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Corby (corby) Assigned to: David Jencks (d_jencks) Summary: ServiceController.create( ObjectName, Collectio Initial Comment: SHORT VERSION: If I set my user MBeans to be dependent on the LocalTxConnectionManager, I can no longer successfully recycle my connection pool. LONG VERSION: (I am running JBoss 3.0.4, JDK 1.4.1_01, Win2K) I am using an MBean configuration file, sybase- service.xml, which is laid out almost identically to the hsqldb-service.xml file. It contains a LocalTxCM MBean, which is dependent on a LocalTxDS MBean and a LocalTXPool MBean. Normally, if I touch sybase-service.xml everything works great. ServiceController.install() is called with LocalTxCM, LocalTxDS, and LocalTxPool. ServiceController.create() is called with LocalTxCM, but it waits because the iDependOn beans haven't been created yet. After LocalTxPool is created, we iterate through the dependsOnMe mbeans and the LocalTxCM MBean is created. All is good. But if I introduce my own MBeans that are dependent on the database connection pool, then the ServiceController.create() method behaves differently. I use the following tag in my user MBeans: dependsjboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=sybaseD S/depends Now I can start the JBoss server just fine. But if I recycle the connection pool, here is what happens: ServiceController.install() is called just as before. The ServiceContexts for all three MBeans look fine. In particular, the iDependOn and the dependsOnMe lists are correct, and my userMBeans have been added to the dependsOnMe list for LocalTxCM. When ServiceController.create() method is called on LocalTxCM, it defers again. When ServiceController.create() is called on the other two MBeans, it seems to succeed. The create() methods are successfully executed on these MBeans. Thanks to dependsOnMe, ServiceController.create() is called on LocalTxCM again. But now when we get the ServiceContexts in the iDependOn list for LocalTxCM, they are all defined as state: NOTYETINSTALLED. So LocalTxCM still fails to create because it believes its dependent MBeans have not yet been created. This leads to the predictable log message: ERROR [URLDeploymentScanner] MBeanException: Exception in MBean operation 'checkIncompleteDeployments()' Cause: Incomplete Deployment listing: Packages waiting for a deployer: none Incompletely deployed packages: none MBeans waiting for classes: none MBeans waiting for other MBeans: ... ObjectName: jboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=sybaseDS state: CONFIGURED I Depend On: jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=LocalTxPool,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=CachedConnectionManager jboss.security:service=JaasSecurityManager jboss.jca:service=RARDeployer jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=LocalTxPool,name=sybaseDS Depends On Me: (My User MBeans) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=660405group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-660405 ] ServiceController.create( ObjectName, Collectio
Bugs item #660405, was opened at 2002-12-31 15:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=660405group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Corby (corby) Assigned to: David Jencks (d_jencks) Summary: ServiceController.create( ObjectName, Collectio Initial Comment: SHORT VERSION: If I set my user MBeans to be dependent on the LocalTxConnectionManager, I can no longer successfully recycle my connection pool. LONG VERSION: (I am running JBoss 3.0.4, JDK 1.4.1_01, Win2K) I am using an MBean configuration file, sybase- service.xml, which is laid out almost identically to the hsqldb-service.xml file. It contains a LocalTxCM MBean, which is dependent on a LocalTxDS MBean and a LocalTXPool MBean. Normally, if I touch sybase-service.xml everything works great. ServiceController.install() is called with LocalTxCM, LocalTxDS, and LocalTxPool. ServiceController.create() is called with LocalTxCM, but it waits because the iDependOn beans haven't been created yet. After LocalTxPool is created, we iterate through the dependsOnMe mbeans and the LocalTxCM MBean is created. All is good. But if I introduce my own MBeans that are dependent on the database connection pool, then the ServiceController.create() method behaves differently. I use the following tag in my user MBeans: dependsjboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=sybaseD S/depends Now I can start the JBoss server just fine. But if I recycle the connection pool, here is what happens: ServiceController.install() is called just as before. The ServiceContexts for all three MBeans look fine. In particular, the iDependOn and the dependsOnMe lists are correct, and my userMBeans have been added to the dependsOnMe list for LocalTxCM. When ServiceController.create() method is called on LocalTxCM, it defers again. When ServiceController.create() is called on the other two MBeans, it seems to succeed. The create() methods are successfully executed on these MBeans. Thanks to dependsOnMe, ServiceController.create() is called on LocalTxCM again. But now when we get the ServiceContexts in the iDependOn list for LocalTxCM, they are all defined as state: NOTYETINSTALLED. So LocalTxCM still fails to create because it believes its dependent MBeans have not yet been created. This leads to the predictable log message: ERROR [URLDeploymentScanner] MBeanException: Exception in MBean operation 'checkIncompleteDeployments()' Cause: Incomplete Deployment listing: Packages waiting for a deployer: none Incompletely deployed packages: none MBeans waiting for classes: none MBeans waiting for other MBeans: ... ObjectName: jboss.jca:service=LocalTxCM,name=sybaseDS state: CONFIGURED I Depend On: jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=LocalTxPool,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=CachedConnectionManager jboss.security:service=JaasSecurityManager jboss.jca:service=RARDeployer jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=sybaseDS jboss.jca:service=LocalTxPool,name=sybaseDS Depends On Me: (My User MBeans) -- Comment By: Corby (corby) Date: 2002-12-31 21:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=25032 The attached files comprise a test case which illustrates the bug -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=660405group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
