[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Fluid AOP

2004-04-20 Thread marc fleury
well Scott is talking about just an abstract keyword (thread local) to identify a given configuration. Is that what you are talking about. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831621#3831621 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Fluid AOP

2004-04-20 Thread Bill Burke
Affirmative. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831625#3831625 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831625 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by:

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Fluid AOP

2004-04-19 Thread Bill Burke
I've been thinking about this over the weekend, and what I think Im going to add is the expansion of CFLOW. Currently CFLOW only looks at the Java call stack. I think I will expand it to look at our metadata chain, or configuration domains.

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Fluid AOP

2004-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pretty much the tcl is set whenever a call enters into a container, be it jmx, ejb, web. Its needed when transitioning from the microkernel into a deployment context that can introduce new classes or class versions due to a deployment. It would generally seem that the TCL is the more typical