RE: [JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-25 Thread Marc Fleury
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of claudehussenet Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on. I have looked at how to answer to my second question

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-23 Thread Bill Burke
That is correct. I'll add this to DR3 when I get a chance. Bill View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3822591#3822591 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3822591

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-22 Thread Bill Burke
although the grammar support call(constructor...) I haven't implemented it yet. I hope to get to it before the release. If you're interested in implementing let me know. Bill View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3822442#3822442 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-22 Thread claudehussenet
I have looked at how to answer to my second question (The easiest one ;-)) The class advised for a Caller pointcut is the calling class. I didn't find a way to get a handle on this class within the implementation of the Interceptor.So ,by adding the following code within the invokeCaller method

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-21 Thread claudehussenet
I have 2 questions regarding the lastest code from CVS that I am currently testing. 1/How to define a caller pointcut as follows I want to intercept every instanciation of the constructor of the class A when it's called within method B or constructor B 2/How can I get information of the caller

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-08 Thread Bill Burke
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820637#3820637 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820637 FYI, for above couldn't it be solved by a caller pointcut in JBoss AOP? Where withClass would be

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-08 Thread rythos
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820653#3820653 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820653 Yeah, you are right in this example. My motivating example wasn't very motivating. :) AspectJ best

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-08 Thread Bill Burke
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820672#3820672 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820672 rythos wrote : Yeah, you are right in this example. My motivating example wasn't very motivating. :)

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-05 Thread rythos
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820323#3820323 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820323 On the subject of control flow, don't forget cflowbelow. Aspectwerkz implemented cflow, but no below. In

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-05 Thread marc fleury
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820347#3820347 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820347 this is great stuff we need you to do a BLOG entry about this to give some visibility and order on the

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New AOP stuff going on.

2004-02-05 Thread rythos
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820351#3820351 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820351 Absolutely. (I use the AspectJ terms because that's how it's easiest to explain). It's very similar to