[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test SecurityTestCase.java

2002-03-06 Thread Peter Antman
User: pra Date: 02/03/06 09:33:31 Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test SecurityTestCase.java Log: Added testcases to test the new security architecture Revision ChangesPath 1.1

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test SecurityTestCase.java

2002-03-06 Thread David Jencks
Maybe you aren't done here... but the naming convention to get your tests run in the testsuite without any other code is to name them xxxUnitTestCase or xxxStressTestCase david jencks On 2002.03.06 12:33:31 -0500 Peter Antman wrote: User: pra Date: 02/03/06 09:33:31 Added:

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test SecurityTestCase.java

2002-03-06 Thread pra
On 6 Mar, David Jencks wrote: Maybe you aren't done here... but the naming convention to get your tests run in the testsuite without any other code is to name them Yea thanks, but all the other tests in JBossMQ appart from the JBoss... is not names UnitTestCase either, and since jason even

Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test SecurityTestCase.java

2002-03-06 Thread David Jencks
Please rename it one way or the other. If it repeats something, call it a stress test, these are run separately from unit tests. IMNSHO a misnamed test that is not run automatically is almost worse than no test at all, because the test writer is apt to think the feature is getting tested when