Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
When I was cleaning up stuff, creation of system module and related work, I was planning on moving all of the EJB specific bits to jboss/ejb, which is why I created the module. It will probably take a day or so to make the move and test it. I can take a stab at it and let ya know. The persistence stuff can either be done before or after. Is all of that rooted in one place? If so I can take a stab at moving that over at the same time. --jason On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:32 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I was just thinking about this the other day... I like just persistence and I would love to have the EJB related stuff moved to an EJB module. I'd also like to get rid of the org.jboss.ejb.plugins as it is just a junk drawer. -dain On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 12:07 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote: Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: JD I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... JD but whatever... what about just persistence? I like just persistence too. alex JD --jason JD On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I think so. Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
If you guys are going to do this, do it soon. Eventually I need to touch a butt load of files in EJB land. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? I was just thinking about this the other day... I like just persistence and I would love to have the EJB related stuff moved to an EJB module. I'd also like to get rid of the org.jboss.ejb.plugins as it is just a junk drawer. -dain On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 12:07 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote: Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: JD I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... JD but whatever... what about just persistence? I like just persistence too. alex JD --jason JD On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I think so. Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
I hope so to both... --jason On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:09 AM, David Jencks wrote: Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
I think so. Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... but whatever... what about just persistence? --jason On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I think so. Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: JD I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... JD but whatever... what about just persistence? I like just persistence too. alex JD --jason JD On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I think so. Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
I was just thinking about this the other day... I like just persistence and I would love to have the EJB related stuff moved to an EJB module. I'd also like to get rid of the org.jboss.ejb.plugins as it is just a junk drawer. -dain On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 12:07 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote: Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: JD I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... JD but whatever... what about just persistence? I like just persistence too. alex JD --jason JD On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I think so. Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'? Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module? Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs? Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb module? david jencks --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
