Sounds like a good idea. When you get your example done post it here.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:10:54 -0500, G. Reno wrote:
>Create a real world, simple, reproducible, vendor-independent example that
>demonstrates the problem. Bring others on board using this, explain it to the press,
>and then
> Create a real world,
nah... it's much more fun to sit on our asses and talk trash...
It is not like you are asked to get off your ass and actually DO something, it is just
that we like yelling, I think this is one of the best rights... the right to yell!
marcf
> Redmond... did you see Fight Club).
sure thing, excellent movie. Just saw one that reminded me of that a bit "The One"
with Jet Li. I recommend "The One", it is a good representation of the multi
universe, really good.
The only way we are going to be succesful is if we come together as a
Create a real world, simple, reproducible, vendor-independent example that
demonstrates the problem. Bring others on board using this, explain it to the press,
and then have everyone together apply pressure to SUN to correct their faulty
implementation.
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM
> To: Jung , Dr. Christoph; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]
> Thread deadlock in cl
|Sun should be beat up. They're going against one of their company's core
|values by stifling inovation.
he he ... do you remember the posters in SF during JavaONE? there was this
big SUN ad with "Innovators are always controversial"... yes from SUN...
he he, funny to think these guys who are
I just filed an EOU-request with reference to the Bug-Id and a priority of
"can´t do without it". Maybe that was a fault, because I just got a review
id and it is not yet visible officially?
Anyone knows how this works? Will they publish the thing not until it
reviewed, or what?
CGJ
__
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Burkhard Vogel
|Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:00 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]
|Thread deadlock in class loader
|keep reopening new bugs instead of being deliberately obnoxious.
|don't think calling the guy's monkeys is going to solve anything.
we will see, maybe you are right maybe you are wrong, who cares...
|(although
|it may be entertaining :)).
yeah, glad you liked it... it is meant to be VERY enter
fleury; Jung , Dr. Christoph;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]
> Thread deadlock in class loader
>
>
> guys. jboss is a central piece of our infrastructure, and we
> would like to
> keep re
day, April 11, 2002 7:44 AM
|To: marc fleury; Jung , Dr. Christoph;
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]
|Thread deadlock in class loader
|
|
|guys. jboss is a central piece of our infrastructure, and we would lik
hursday, April 11, 2002 8:47 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread
deadlock in class loader
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4406709.html
I just did a (too harsh?) comment to that closed "non-bug" trying to explain
why that issu
; Jung , Dr. Christoph;
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]
|Thread deadlock in class loader
|
|
|guys. jboss is a central piece of our infrastructure, and we would like to
|keep recommending it to customers. it might be
e bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev]
Thread deadlock in class loader
|I have no idea whether these guys have ever reopened a bug after being
|bombed with comments?
I'll go in there and insult them in the name of jboss :)
|Maybe you should not mention Jboss to increase the chances of being not
|ign
otclasspath/p:patch.jar option?
>
> CGJ
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2002 23:22
> An: Jung , Dr. Christoph
> Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader
>
>
>
|I have no idea whether these guys have ever reopened a bug after being
|bombed with comments?
I'll go in there and insult them in the name of jboss :)
|Maybe you should not mention Jboss to increase the chances of being not
|ignored ???
actually do the contrary.
TogetherSoft just ran a poll
'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Jung , Dr.
> Christoph
> Envoyé : jeudi, 11 avril 2002 15:48
> À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Objet : [JBoss-user] Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBo
Von: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2002 23:22
An: Jung , Dr. Christoph
Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader
Seems like sun does not think it is a bug
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4406709.html
> -Ursprün
; Ok, maybe now I will file a bug at SUN ...
>
> CGJ
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Montag, 8. April 2002 17:43
> An: Jboss-Development@Lists. ""Sourceforge. Net
> Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadloc
uot;Sourceforge. Net
Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader
I have a strange deadlock problem between two threads that are completely
unrelated. Could some-one point me in the right direction to solve this
problem. Here are the two threads in question .. The first one ins accessing
thri
I have a strange deadlock problem between two threads that are
completely unrelated. Could some-one point me in the right direction to
solve this problem. Here are the two threads in question ..
The first one ins accessing thrid party jars and the second one is
trying to look up an entity bean an
21 matches
Mail list logo
