I've had only two customers ask about CORBA support, but only as an
interim solution until the clients can be rewritten. Fortunately both
decided to just port the clients at the same time.
-dain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 05:04 PM, Luke Taylor wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
Maybe we're
] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
I've had only two customers ask about CORBA support, but only as an
interim solution until the clients can
Plus, it is ... a spec requirement!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: vendredi, 28. février 2003 01:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the
best thing since sliced bread
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the
best thing
since sliced bread
This is really boring and unpleasant, bill. We
don't seem to
I am sorry I am boring you
,
Sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: lundi, 24. février 2003 21:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the
best thing since sliced bread
well, aside from my and babelfish's inability to translate that...
Yeah... That's because I did a mistake... Shame... It is not Ortille, but
Ortie, which means nettle. That gives:
Maybe I am pushing Grand Mother in the nettles (i.e. maybe I go too
far...)
1. I was planning to move the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
On 2003.02.24 14:35 Bill Burke
How about implementing some kind of seperate interceptor framwork around the client side and server side invocation layers??
David, if yoiu had a configurable way to plug in your tx interceptors at the invocation layer you would be ok right? I think david just needs to avoid duplicating the code
] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing since sliced
bread
How about implementing some kind of seperate interceptor framwork around
the client side and server side invocation layers??
David, if yoiu had a configurable way to plug in your tx interceptors at
the invocation layer you would be ok
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is
still the best thing since
sliced bread
How about implementing some kind of seperate
interceptor framwork around
the client side and server side invocation layers
Maybe we're confusing 2 issues here:
1. writing a maintainable usable jboss dtm
2. supporting corba etc.
I realize I am not entirely comfortable with the client interceptors, and I
notice that they are not really used in the local proxies. I don't think
my idea of using the client
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is
still the best thing since
sliced bread
How about implementing some kind of seperate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
This is really boring
On 2003.02.24 10:39 Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since
Hello David,
I tend to regard the functionality in client interceptors as really
required to make anything work. I agree that chain/invoker
is excessive.
I think we need the same client side interceptor stack no
matter what the
transport. For java clients, these interceptors will
On 2003.02.24 11:22 Sacha Labourey wrote:
Hello David,
I tend to regard the functionality in client interceptors as really
required to make anything work. I agree that chain/invoker
is excessive.
I think we need the same client side interceptor stack no
matter what the
logic?
-dain
On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 09:39 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still
, February 24, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
Bill,
Where is you design? David's design looks totally obvious to me. It
is well understood, and based on our existing real-world experiences.
To me
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
Bill,
Where is you design? David's design looks totally obvious
Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
Bill,
Where is you design? David's design looks totally obvious to me. It
is well understood
]
Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
Bill,
Where is you design? David's design looks totally obvious
to me. It
is well
: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the
best thing
since sliced bread
This is really boring and unpleasant, bill. We don't seem to
I am sorry I am boring you. Summarized, my major
One more thing. This was fine in 2.4 and 3.0 when there was a one to one
mapping between client, transport and EJB Container, but in 3.2 and
higher,
there is a many to one relationship between transport and EJB Container.
So? I just checked standard jboss.xml and all the client
is already
being prepared.
Thanks in advance.
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
Bill, what I find
Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
Bill, what I find really boring and unpleasant about this
discussion is
that I can't find any
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the
best thing since sliced bread
This is really boring and unpleasant, bill. We
This is really boring and unpleasant, bill. We don't seem to have a shared
understanding of how interceptors ought to work with local and remote
calls. Most of your comments make no sense to me, and I think
contrariwise. I'll try to explain my view one more time, and I'll write an
interceptor
On 2003.02.21 18:58 Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is really really bad
---
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing
since sliced bread
On 2003.02.21 18:58 Bill Burke
29 matches
Mail list logo