RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-25 Thread Bill Burke
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3 > > > Bill Burke wrote: > > &

RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-25 Thread Jay Walters
timization(read-ahead) phase 3 What if I've got CMP and BMP beans mixed... -Original Message- From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3 Bill Burke wrote: > &

RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-25 Thread Bill Burke
5, 2001 8:16 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3 > > > What if I've got CMP and BMP beans mixed... > > -Original Message- > From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:1

RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-25 Thread Jay Walters
What if I've got CMP and BMP beans mixed... -Original Message- From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3 Bill Burke wrote: > >> > > > Can

Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-24 Thread danch
Bill Burke wrote: > >> > > > Can you explain this again in other words? I'm kind of confused. Are you > saying you don't want to have a hashMap of preloaded data per transaction? > But just one global cache? I think that is a bad idea. I'll clarify more > if this is what you mean. That i

RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-22 Thread Bill Burke
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3 > > > I mentioned in another ema

Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-21 Thread danch
I mentioned in another email that this didn't seem to work for findAll or findBy. I've just checked that in. Another thing I've been thinking about is modifying the CommandFactory so that it doesn't bind the preloaded data to a transaction for commit option A. Rational: If it's commit option A

[JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3

2001-06-21 Thread Bill Burke
All,   Building off of danch's great work, I extended the read-ahead feature of CMP/JAWS   New features:   * the read-ahead flag is defaultable in standardjaws.xml and jaws.xml   * The finder SQL select call and the LoadEntities SQL select call are now combined.  Instead of 2 sql calls the